COD4 needs something else

2007-12-13 19:12:25

#26

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|6985|UK

sergeriver wrote:
KILLSWITCH wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
For fun I play CS, which has no stats no unlocks, nothing else. If you put ranks to a game, don't make it so easy to reach the highest rank in a day or two. Make it harder like BF2. Just a thought.
DF: Black Hawk Down was the same for me, no ranks no unlocks, just pure fun. I loved that game, best FPS ever.
Let's face it, Cod4 is a CS with ranks, and less maps. Dust, Dust2, Inferno, Aztec, Train, etc, you can't beat those maps.

No you really can. Some of the those maps just fail in terms of good map design, there are FAR better player made maps for CSS.

Once the COD4 editor comes out expect lots of new maps.

Last edited by Vilham (2007-12-13 19:13:53)

2007-12-13 19:16:58

#27

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6787|Mountains of NC

its good but for just a littel bit .............. 30 hours casual playing and I'm a general ( BF2 I've logged in over 400 hours and I'm Sgt Major )

maps go quickly (unless the server is set to 500)

maps are small

hit reg. is bad

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg

2007-12-13 19:20:27

#28

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6862

more maps

2007-12-13 19:21:57

#29

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|6985|UK

SEREMAKER wrote:
hit reg. is bad

Sorry... what!?

Are you fuking insane? Hit reg is near perfect!

2007-12-13 19:23:10

#30

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6787|Mountains of NC

they need bigger maps, just bc theres no vehicles doesn't mean they can't make it big

2007-12-13 19:27:35

#31

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6787|Mountains of NC

Vilham wrote:
SEREMAKER wrote:
hit reg. is bad
Sorry... what!?

Are you fuking insane? Hit reg is near perfect!

bs perfect my ass ............... I've watched those kill cam shots and the cross hairs are no where close and they get a head shot

2007-12-13 19:27:41

#32

S.Lythberg: Mastermind; +429|6666|Chicago, IL

SEREMAKER wrote:
they need bigger maps, just bc theres no vehicles doesn't mean they can't make it big

seriously, the sniper rifles are next to useless, you're never out of range of the basic assault rifles, or even the SMGs

2007-12-13 19:29:43

#33

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6787|Mountains of NC

S.Lythberg wrote:
SEREMAKER wrote:
they need bigger maps, just bc theres no vehicles doesn't mean they can't make it big
seriously, the sniper rifles are next to useless, you're never out of range of the basic assault rifles, or even the SMGs

or the hand guns ...................................... or hell anyone can just draw out their knife and drop 5 on the other side of the map

2007-12-13 19:29:51

#34

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6862

SEREMAKER wrote:
Vilham wrote:
SEREMAKER wrote:
hit reg. is bad
Sorry... what!?

Are you fuking insane? Hit reg is near perfect!
bs perfect my ass ............... I've watched those kill cam shots and the cross hairs are no where close and they get a head shot

bullet fragment.

2007-12-13 19:31:27

#35

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6787|Mountains of NC

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
SEREMAKER wrote:
Vilham wrote:

Sorry... what!?

Are you fuking insane? Hit reg is near perfect!
bs perfect my ass ............... I've watched those kill cam shots and the cross hairs are no where close and they get a head shot
bullet fragment.

I believe it to be " magic JFK bullet " up and to the left, up and to the left

2007-12-13 19:41:10

#36

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6543|New Haven, CT

I think that you should be able to have multiple attachments, but surrender one perk per each extra attachment, and the second one for the GL.

A silencer extra would kill the green perk, and a sight extra the red. You would have no perks with a fully attached gun.

2007-12-14 02:44:02

#37

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|6976|Argentina

aj0404 wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
firebolt5 wrote:
Um, play the game for fun after level 55? If anyone even remembers that word anymore in video games, now it's just "I have to get all this shit first and not play the game for fun", meaning the stats, ranks, unlocks, etc...
For fun I play CS, which has no stats no unlocks, nothing else. If you put ranks to a game, don't make it so easy to reach the highest rank in a day or two. Make it harder like BF2. Just a thought.
so once you get all the ranks you don't find playing the game to be fun?

No, because the game lacks larger maps, and the motivation curbs as soon as you get to lvl 55. And it's not because I want to presume about it, for that you have BF2, lol. The stats are in your Pc, nobody gets to see them. The problem is the game is lacking more maps, more challenges, more weapons, more awards.

2007-12-14 02:46:29

#38

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|6976|Argentina

Spearhead wrote:
Well first off most of the BEST maps which were from COD1 are absent. Maps like Pavlov, Carentan, Harbor, etc. etc. are already made, they just didnt port them into the game.

What they're doing is making the game come with fewer maps on purpose, so they can charge console users for extras they've already made but just didnt "have the time" to put in. Us PC players will get 2 or 3 extra for free but that'll be it.

Its exactly what they did in CoD2.

Well, then fuck IW and Activision, lol. I pay 50 bucks for a game and I want it to last more than 24 hrs of gameplay. BF2 costed the same but I played it for more than 1000 hrs and I never got bored.

2007-12-14 02:48:37

#39

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|6976|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:
Did you complete all the challenges?

Almost, except a couple of ridiculous ones. And I'm not doing those with guns I don't use.

2007-12-14 02:52:12

#40

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|6976|Argentina

Vilham wrote:
PBAsydney wrote:
Yea, reached level 55, done all challenges, now I don't feel like playing anymore...
Thats rather sad that you dont look at the quality of a game, you just rate it on how occupied it keeps you, you would probably like wow...

I love CS and it has no awards, no unlocks, no ranks, no anything, yet I find it fun. When you make a game that is like CS, and you put ranks and challenges on it, you need to make it harder to get those. CS has lots of great maps, which this game hasn't. Period.

2007-12-14 02:54:11

#41

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|6976|Argentina

Vilham wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
KILLSWITCH wrote:

DF: Black Hawk Down was the same for me, no ranks no unlocks, just pure fun. I loved that game, best FPS ever.
Let's face it, Cod4 is a CS with ranks, and less maps. Dust, Dust2, Inferno, Aztec, Train, etc, you can't beat those maps.
No you really can. Some of the those maps just fail in terms of good map design, there are FAR better player made maps for CSS.

Once the COD4 editor comes out expect lots of new maps.

Those maps are far better than the maps included in this game.

2007-12-14 14:18:01

#42

Christbane: Member; +51|6454

sergeriver wrote:
I don't know what, but once you get to lvl 55 and you get the golden Deagle, what's next? Nothing. In consoles you have the prestige mode, which is not a big deal either. I think they should add something else. The challenges are all doable and some of them are not even fun, like the ones involving shitty arms. That's where BF2 is more lasting as game. What do you think? What could they add to make the game more interesting after lvl 55?

I said this a week into the game and got blasted to hell for it >/ I still enjoy it after making a new char. but it is quickly becoming same ole same ole. I hope new content comes soon and often.

BF2S Forums COD4 needs something else

sergeriver wrote:

KILLSWITCH wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

Vilham wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

Vilham wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

Vilham wrote:

aj0404 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

firebolt5 wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Vilham wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

Vilham wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

KILLSWITCH wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Board footer