Okay, first of all, you're saying that a worthless dollar means we won't have any purchasing power and our 'economy will grind to a halt'.
This is absolutely not true. A weakened dollar only means we won't have any purchasing power of IMPORTS. International trade only makes up less than 15% of our GDP (e.g. toyota cars are not imports. they are products of the american branch of toyota, sold in dollars. however they worsen our current account deficit by sending profits to their headquarters in Japan). Yes, a weakened dollar will mean imports will be inflated.
However, if you are saying that our purchasing power is decreased due to inflation sparked by the low dollar (as companies sub-contract multiple parts of their products in foreign countries, their costs rise due to exchange rate transactions, and this increased cost is passed down to the consumer in the form of higher prices), then I understand. I don't know that much about this yet, all I know is that this is what Ron Paul is saying and Ben Bernake isn't.
Why would we make and export steel when other nations are more efficient at it? We should focus more on technology and services, things that the US and the EU are good at.
I would like to reiterate what i've written above: "actually, loose monetary policy like that doesn't occur anymore, not since well over 50 years ago. that policy of printing money is morein line with what south american countries did 20 years or such and so ago."
Money growth (money supply/printing money) is actually pretty moderate according to Ben Bernake. And we've only reduced interest rates due to trying to help the credit crunch of the subprime mortgage crisis. We don't do this all the time and the Fed generally doesn't like loose monetary policy (changing the interest rate lower) because it breeds inflation. Inflation in the US would mean foreign companies won't invest in the US as much, and sell their assets there (weakening the dollar). This weakening of the dollar would mean more inflation in the US (according to Ron Paul). However, low interest rates help the banks, which then help the various economic sectors that have been hurt in mortgage crisis. So I think Bernake weighed the pros and cons of lowering the interest rates and decided to lower it for the time being.
Sorry I made a mistake above. Instead of the sentence: "Fed is not printing money, it's borrowing money. and its borrowing with T-bills and other variants. treasury bonds. " I meant: "Fed is printing money, the Treasury Department (seperate government entity) is lending T bills and treasury bonds to fund its budget". I wanted to point out that there is less confidence that the US is able to pay back its debts, because of its current account deficit, and therefore foreign investors are selling off their assets in the US, weakening the dollar. The Fed printing money doesn't directly weaken the dollar, it increases inflation, and that makes investors less than happy, which also makes them want to sell off their assets in the US.
The Fed printing money: Money supply = monetary policy, is different from lending Treasury Bills (T Bills) in order to fund the government budget, which is fiscal policy. The Fed is the Central Bank (monetary), the Treasury Department is one of the bureaucracies under the Executive Branch of the US government, which is ruled under the President. The Fed as a central Bank is much more independent from the government than other central banks. It does however have to report to Congress (Legislative) occasionally, but it retains its secrecy and independence.
This is absolutely not true. A weakened dollar only means we won't have any purchasing power of IMPORTS. International trade only makes up less than 15% of our GDP (e.g. toyota cars are not imports. they are products of the american branch of toyota, sold in dollars. however they worsen our current account deficit by sending profits to their headquarters in Japan). Yes, a weakened dollar will mean imports will be inflated.
However, if you are saying that our purchasing power is decreased due to inflation sparked by the low dollar (as companies sub-contract multiple parts of their products in foreign countries, their costs rise due to exchange rate transactions, and this increased cost is passed down to the consumer in the form of higher prices), then I understand. I don't know that much about this yet, all I know is that this is what Ron Paul is saying and Ben Bernake isn't.
Why would we make and export steel when other nations are more efficient at it? We should focus more on technology and services, things that the US and the EU are good at.
I would like to reiterate what i've written above: "actually, loose monetary policy like that doesn't occur anymore, not since well over 50 years ago. that policy of printing money is morein line with what south american countries did 20 years or such and so ago."
Money growth (money supply/printing money) is actually pretty moderate according to Ben Bernake. And we've only reduced interest rates due to trying to help the credit crunch of the subprime mortgage crisis. We don't do this all the time and the Fed generally doesn't like loose monetary policy (changing the interest rate lower) because it breeds inflation. Inflation in the US would mean foreign companies won't invest in the US as much, and sell their assets there (weakening the dollar). This weakening of the dollar would mean more inflation in the US (according to Ron Paul). However, low interest rates help the banks, which then help the various economic sectors that have been hurt in mortgage crisis. So I think Bernake weighed the pros and cons of lowering the interest rates and decided to lower it for the time being.
Sorry I made a mistake above. Instead of the sentence: "Fed is not printing money, it's borrowing money. and its borrowing with T-bills and other variants. treasury bonds. " I meant: "Fed is printing money, the Treasury Department (seperate government entity) is lending T bills and treasury bonds to fund its budget". I wanted to point out that there is less confidence that the US is able to pay back its debts, because of its current account deficit, and therefore foreign investors are selling off their assets in the US, weakening the dollar. The Fed printing money doesn't directly weaken the dollar, it increases inflation, and that makes investors less than happy, which also makes them want to sell off their assets in the US.
The Fed printing money: Money supply = monetary policy, is different from lending Treasury Bills (T Bills) in order to fund the government budget, which is fiscal policy. The Fed is the Central Bank (monetary), the Treasury Department is one of the bureaucracies under the Executive Branch of the US government, which is ruled under the President. The Fed as a central Bank is much more independent from the government than other central banks. It does however have to report to Congress (Legislative) occasionally, but it retains its secrecy and independence.