herrr_smity
Member
+156|6653|space command ur anus
gay porn or swords
SEREVENT
MASSIVE G STAR
+605|6133|Birmingham, UK

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Gawwad wrote:

It's not a weapon.
yes it is.
No, its not, disease is only a weapon if used as biological warfare, unless quintillions (15 zero's) of germs are declaring war on us right now...
Lai
Member
+186|6176

Kmarion wrote:

Not all of these meet the criteria of the OP but interesting none-the-less. So sayeth the History Channel.
During World War I, technological advances in weaponry led to the deaths of over 8 million. One of the deadliest killers of the war was the machine gun. Steadfast commanders relied on old tactics developed for cavalry to attack this new killing machine. After the first 24 hours of the Battle of Somme, 20,000 British soldiers were mowed down behind a barrage of bullets from this new killing machine.
Crap that is,.. it was primarily the enemy not being prepared and the mentioned "old tactics" in combination with new technology that resulted in the death of those men; not the MG as a weapon design.
SEREVENT
MASSIVE G STAR
+605|6133|Birmingham, UK

Longbow wrote:

Flecco wrote:

Still in love with the USSR eh?
No. USSR is past. I'm not fond of communism or Soviet lifestyle. I just like soviet tech.

Flecco wrote:

For the record, that 'unlicenced piece of junk' is normally bought from Russian companies. Russia is one of the biggest arms dealers on earth.
3/4 of AK's aren't from Russia. They are from China ( yes , China has lisence but breaks the technology ), Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, any other ME country,
Africa, Latin America etc. These AK's have very low quality.
Romania makes the best AK-47's... i saw it on situation critical on National Geographic.
Ben0
The Last Gunslinger
+38|6400|Southampton
How about just bullets? its not the gun that kills you, its the bullet...
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6787

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

I'd go with the AK47.
Is it because it is powerful or because it is a black market weapon that anyone can get their hands on?
It's not relevant to the thread.  It doesn't matter the efectiveness, what really matters is the amount of people killed by that weapon.
So more people have died by knives than nukes, that makes a knife more deadly?  I guess we should arm our subs with flying knives.
Ben0
The Last Gunslinger
+38|6400|Southampton
Nuclear knives. with knife shrapnel. And have guns fire knives. a knife minigun.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6646|London, England
Rocket Propelled Chainsaw!

https://www.fototime.com/E4012A0E4893DAB/orig.jpg

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/0803/sergey25/Artwork2/ImageD.jpg
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6669

Bf2-GeneralArnott wrote:

disease is only a weapon if used as biological warfare
you just wanna argue, you fuckwit
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6436|'Murka

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:


Is it because it is powerful or because it is a black market weapon that anyone can get their hands on?
It's not relevant to the thread.  It doesn't matter the efectiveness, what really matters is the amount of people killed by that weapon.
So more people have died by knives than nukes, that makes a knife more deadly?  I guess we should arm our subs with flying knives.
Unfortunately, the OP bound us with a poor metric by which to make the comparison. Your post points out just how poor that metric is in defining the deadliest weapon in history.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6669
Gunslinger OIF II is the deadliest weapon in history.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|6783|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:


Is it because it is powerful or because it is a black market weapon that anyone can get their hands on?
It's not relevant to the thread.  It doesn't matter the efectiveness, what really matters is the amount of people killed by that weapon.
So more people have died by knives than nukes, that makes a knife more deadly?  I guess we should arm our subs with flying knives.
Lol?  Read the OP, I'm not asking for efectiveness, but for total numbers.  I don't know which weapon caused most kills, then I started the thread.
Darkhelmet
cereal killer
+233|6776|the middle of nowhere

fadedsteve wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

Religion Is The Deadliest Weapon.  It Kills Millions In The Name Of Fictitious Gods.
+1 Couldnt agree with you more on that!

Religion may not directly be a "weapon" but its easily the thing most people use to attack someone else about!!

edit: The most deadly weapon in the world has to be a US Marine and his Rifle! For my buddy Andrew!
Religion really isn't a weapon, but most wars were probably fought over it [religion].
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|6783|Argentina

FEOS wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


It's not relevant to the thread.  It doesn't matter the efectiveness, what really matters is the amount of people killed by that weapon.
So more people have died by knives than nukes, that makes a knife more deadly?  I guess we should arm our subs with flying knives.
Unfortunately, the OP bound us with a poor metric by which to make the comparison. Your post points out just how poor that metric is in defining the deadliest weapon in history.
I think the OP is very clear.  It's obvious that there's no official statistics about total kills/weapon.  Maybe you can find statistics for the XXth century.  Therefore we can't measure it accurately, but we can guess it.
yuckfou09
hide your terrorists ^,^
+94|6702|Ft. Drum, NY
artillery (king of battle)
_NL_Lt.EngineerFox
Big Mouth Prick
+219|6556|Golf 1.8 GTI Wolfsburg Edition
Napalm.
Brasso
member
+1,549|6656

For crying out loud, religion.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+794|6710|United States of America
I don't feel like reading 5 pages, but ...MAN!
Gawwad
My way or Haddaway!
+212|6710|Espoo, Finland

haffeysucks wrote:

For crying out loud, religion.
Is not a weapon.



Why the hell do people feel the need to get overly creative with their 'weapons'?

"Air is the deadliest weapon. We couldn't kill people if we didn't have air to breathe. <add stupid face here>"

Last edited by Gawwad (2007-11-27 13:18:57)

avman633
Member
+116|6390
obesity
GATOR591957
Member
+84|6652
Religion, or mankind's interpretation.
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+794|6710|United States of America

Gawwad wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

For crying out loud, religion.
Is not a weapon.



Why the hell do people feel the need to get overly creative with their 'weapons'?

"Air is the deadliest weapon. We couldn't kill people if we didn't have air to breathe. <add stupid face here>"
Air makes more sense than religion. Air is a concrete noun as opposed to the abstract idea that represents religion, which is just the choice of fools taking a stab at a facet of man, and themselves by proxy.
CDK3Y
Member
+25|6164|BEHIND YOU!
The Mind has been the deadliest weapon...ever.....its either that or MAN
Gawwad
My way or Haddaway!
+212|6710|Espoo, Finland

avman633 wrote:

obesity
Ever heard of hunger?
SoC./Omega
Member
+122|6566|Omaha, Nebraska!
It has to be artillery.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard