Rate it please.
Rate it please.
needs smoothing on the black on the righthand side go over it with a blur on a low percentage and theres a little grey box on the tip of the right hand side not sure if its ment to be there or not.
Not bad for first attempt. Keep working it you'll eventually stumble upon something cool and unique.
i like it....what is it a logo for?
ill be able to give you my full opinion then......im actually searching for a logo right now to stamp on my knives, im thinking of a griffin, but i dont know.
anyway, keep at it man.
ill be able to give you my full opinion then......im actually searching for a logo right now to stamp on my knives, im thinking of a griffin, but i dont know.
anyway, keep at it man.
The square on the top right hand corner doesn't look right.....
Otherwise very nice.
Otherwise very nice.
Yer that sticky out thing looks odd, I'd soften the bit where the blue meets the black too, and you've got blue jaggies on the inside of the right side. I like the logo as a whole though, wouldn't alter it much if at all, just needs a tidy up really.
looks like some sort of preloader. you should use it for that, make a logo with some sort of noticable symbol or something.
Thanks for the comments. Its for a website I'm planing to make. Glad you like it. But as I said, its v1. Going to fix it sometime. Don't know if its good yet or if I make more...
Not a bad start. Fix the pixelation in the edges and that weird black thing at the top of the right side and you're good to go
So I shouldn't change the font of the R?
Just thought I'd jump in an ventilate my humble but honest opinion.
You are on the way to a good and clear logo, but it misses the spirit/you in it.
- Clear font
- Usage of font and a logotype
- Colors choice
- The e and s. are out of alignment, and out of style compared to the R.
- The shadow effect is not the best way to start of with a logo, first try to smooth things out by creating a black and white version of the logo on a white background.
- The sudden switch between the blue and black in the middle.
You are on the way to a good and clear logo, but it misses the spirit/you in it.
Thanks for the comment. I'm just working on different versions of this logo. Don't know tough how to leave the shadow. The website will have a white background I hope. So, I don't really know which colours.
The Good: The letters are easy to see and the colors don't give me a headache.
The Bad: Visual glitches and a rough transition (cyan/black) with no background support for the color jump. What's the period for? Is this an acronym or an abbreviation? (ah...your handle) The period throws off the three-letter balance, what with two small letters on either side of a huge R. Excessive shadows without even the slightest of bevel/3D effects are a cliché.
The Ugly: With just the logo alone, I can't tell what you're talking about, nor why the R is so important. Be sure to explain that site's reason for existence as soon as you can at the top of the page.
Etc: The arc is good if the logo is at the center of visual info from the left to the right. I can't tell if it's too thin or thick, because I don't know what other material it'll be displayed with.
If you're interested in the topic, 'The Non-Designer's Design Book' (Williams, R) is a great resource (used in many introductory media courses). If you can find it at your local library, great. If not, $20 won't set you back too much for its quality.
The Bad: Visual glitches and a rough transition (cyan/black) with no background support for the color jump. What's the period for? Is this an acronym or an abbreviation? (ah...your handle) The period throws off the three-letter balance, what with two small letters on either side of a huge R. Excessive shadows without even the slightest of bevel/3D effects are a cliché.
The Ugly: With just the logo alone, I can't tell what you're talking about, nor why the R is so important. Be sure to explain that site's reason for existence as soon as you can at the top of the page.
Etc: The arc is good if the logo is at the center of visual info from the left to the right. I can't tell if it's too thin or thick, because I don't know what other material it'll be displayed with.
If you're interested in the topic, 'The Non-Designer's Design Book' (Williams, R) is a great resource (used in many introductory media courses). If you can find it at your local library, great. If not, $20 won't set you back too much for its quality.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-08-09 04:09:30)