This is my first sig be critics on it say whatever you want. Please rate it.
Say whatever you think is wrong with it.
Three words:
Way. To. Big.
Way. To. Big.
Kinds hard to see.
Its too big.
Its too big.
Okay ill make it smaller
The 0 is fucked. and it's too big.
And I couldn't read bf2 on the left corner if I wouldnt know the logo.
And I couldn't read bf2 on the left corner if I wouldnt know the logo.
okay.
Yea anything else anyone.
I'd cut out the space between riffle and arm.
Make another sig
/lolpwnt.r'Eeee wrote:
Make another sig
There's too much wrong with it to say anything.
I don't have enough time or patience to go through it all with you.
I don't have enough time or patience to go through it all with you.
i dont think its bad. the bf2 is really hard to look at though.
The pic didnt even load for me maybe its the internet saving me the pain.
Interwebz are rescueing you.B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
The pic didnt even load for me maybe its the internet saving me the pain.
Lay off it. I don't think any of you were born leet PS pros (and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway), and I'll bet your first sigs were hardly amazing.
Actually you know when you load photoshop you see lots of names im in there.k30dxedle wrote:
Lay off it. I don't think any of you were born leet PS pros (and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway), and I'll bet your first sigs were hardly amazing.
I just don't like people that are proud of their work when in reality it sucks. I know that's mean of me to say, and I totally think you should always be proud of your work, but after months of seeings awesome artwork, this is really nothing to be proud of.k30dxedle wrote:
Lay off it. I don't think any of you were born leet PS pros (and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway), and I'll bet your first sigs were hardly amazing.
agreed..k30dxedle wrote:
Lay off it. I don't think any of you were born leet PS pros (and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway), and I'll bet your first sigs were hardly amazing.
Its good that people are eager to show off what they have made, but people (especially here - bf2s/graphics) are more than happy to put beginners down.
True, its mostly known screenshots/logos and pics with filters.. but what were your first photoshop creations like? mine wernt better than this..
He never said he was proud of it. He wanted you all to rate it, and "it sucks noob" is the most bullshit rating I've ever heard of.Ryan wrote:
I just don't like people that are proud of their work when in reality it sucks. I know that's mean of me to say, and I totally think you should always be proud of your work, but after months of seeings awesome artwork, this is really nothing to be proud of.k30dxedle wrote:
Lay off it. I don't think any of you were born leet PS pros (and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway), and I'll bet your first sigs were hardly amazing.
Maybe I'm being too blunt. I don't give a shit. The Graphics section has gotten too elitist. Not a pro? GTFO or you'll be flamed to the same result.
kk30dxedle wrote:
Lay off it.
No, I wasn't.k30dxedle wrote:
I don't think any of you were born leet PS pros
I wasn't born b4 1987k30dxedle wrote:
(and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway)
And yes, my first sig wasn't amazing, but it was better than this.
again.. agreed!k30dxedle wrote:
He never said he was proud of it. He wanted you all to rate it, and "it sucks noob" is the most bullshit rating I've ever heard of.Ryan wrote:
I just don't like people that are proud of their work when in reality it sucks. I know that's mean of me to say, and I totally think you should always be proud of your work, but after months of seeings awesome artwork, this is really nothing to be proud of.k30dxedle wrote:
Lay off it. I don't think any of you were born leet PS pros (and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway), and I'll bet your first sigs were hardly amazing.
Maybe I'm being too blunt. I don't give a shit. The Graphics section has gotten too elitist. Not a pro? GTFO or you'll be flamed to the same result.
this section is getting suckier by the second imo.. but I guess its only because I'm not a "pr0" -_- - good thing there is a EU section then, k30
EDIT:
Well, we cant all be as "gifted" as you, can we now? we all have to start somewhere..Ersguterjunge wrote:
I wasn't born b4 1987k30dxedle wrote:
(and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway)
And yes, my first sig wasn't amazing, but it was better than this.
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-08-02 11:19:04)
Well, I don't bitch about his sig. It's ok, everyone is starting once.Z-trooper wrote:
Well, we cant all be as "gifted" as you, can we now? we all have to start somewhere..Ersguterjunge wrote:
I wasn't born b4 1987k30dxedle wrote:
(and if you were born before 1987, PS didn't exist anyway)
And yes, my first sig wasn't amazing, but it was better than this.
But...: He's posting around 8 sigs in the Unused sig thread. 95% of them were renders with effects...
Bevel emboss = try to avoid it as much as possible.
Large sigs leave lots of gaps, and become uninteresting.
Contrast is vital to a signature, too little, it looks muddled, too much, it looks odd.
For a first sig it's good, once you start using it more and look back you'll think wow.
Large sigs leave lots of gaps, and become uninteresting.
Contrast is vital to a signature, too little, it looks muddled, too much, it looks odd.
For a first sig it's good, once you start using it more and look back you'll think wow.
True k30, this isn't a graphics forum, it's a battlefield 2 forum. I guess we shouldn't be too harsh. We could be harsh though, if this was a real graphics forum.