"nukes are so dangerous that nobody in their right mind would use them in fear of getting some sent back.'Mekstizzle wrote:
Thing is nukes are so dangerous that nobody in their right mind would use them in fear of getting some sent back. Mutually Assured Destruction has pretty much prevented what would've otherwise been certain war between the US and the Soviet Union.agent146 wrote:
ya but i prefer ww2 style is more then "send nukes to enemy- receive enemy nukes- winner are the last one standing."Mekstizzle wrote:
Lol
In the case of a massive WW3 conflict. What would be the point of needing more infantry? Walk out into the field, KABLAMMO, nuclear fireball. Everyone dies instantly. Rinse and repeat until everyone is dead.
That's the good thing about nukes. They prevent this kind of shit from happening. I pray that all the Major countries keep nukes forever, and that there will never be a way to fully stop a nuke from hitting its target. It's the only way you'll prevent full scale WW2 style conflict.
Except for Islamic nations now days!