Useless? I believe your post is useless.Larkin wrote:
Agree. Besides USA has proven itself to be useless against guerilla tactics...which would undoubtedly ensue from their invading Pakistan. Maybe Russia would try and take it too.Elamdri wrote:
Why bother, India will take care of it.
Poll
Should we invade Pakistan if its government falls?
| Yes, and America should also withdraw from Iraq. | 9% | 9% - 4 | ||||
| Yes, but America should keep some troops in Iraq too. | 12% | 12% - 5 | ||||
| No, but America should stay in Iraq until it is stable. | 34% | 34% - 14 | ||||
| No, and America should withdraw from Iraq. | 39% | 39% - 16 | ||||
| Other (explain) | 4% | 4% - 2 | ||||
| Total: 41 | ||||||
OP: Um, no?
Last edited by jonsimon (2007-07-06 13:34:01)
Ug, I would hate to see the resulting scuffle of India and Russia fighting over Pakistan.Larkin wrote:
Agree. Besides USA has proven itself to be useless against guerilla tactics...which would undoubtedly ensue from their invading Pakistan. Maybe Russia would try and take it too.Elamdri wrote:
Why bother, India will take care of it.
But the Indians would definitely love to reap Pakistan in the dust. Not that I would really care, mind you.
Just for the record......Osama has a real name. Usama, I kid you not. Ironic really but that's how they spelt it on the F.B.I's most wanted list...
Sorry for being off topic.
As you were...
Sorry for being off topic.
As you were...
Pakistan having nukes would make any kind of open invasion disastrous; any intervention would have to be of a clandestine nature.
If by clandestine, you mean pre-emptively destroying their nukes through an air strike, I agree.Braddock wrote:
Pakistan having nukes would make any kind of open invasion disastrous; any intervention would have to be of a clandestine nature.