• Index » 
  • Community » 
  • Graphics » 
  • The Reduction Of Siglateral Images Due To Inflation of Siglateral Size
Ace.O.Lamb
Got Lamb?
+56|6489|Outside your Back window
Yes I made up a few words, Yes i used words that do not make much sense and Yes i do have a reason for this post.

Today at 06:36:15 I received a message informing me that i have just had my signature removed.

I request a new sig, a sig so great that it burns the eyes of who ever looks at it. It must be the correct size and conform to forums rules. It must Contain this image https://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k68/Pure_beef_69/gotbeef1kv6.png

It must also express my hidden anger towards the sig expelling rules, as it was those rules that destroyed my work of art.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7058|Alberta, Canada

Didn't you make a thread already about this?
Ace.O.Lamb
Got Lamb?
+56|6489|Outside your Back window

Ryan wrote:

Didn't you make a thread already about this?
What has been done has been done. THIS IS THE FUTURE RYAN. My old thread was completely different, i just wanted some advice on size, i got the advice and i still got my sig removed
Archer
rapes face
+161|6639|Canuckistan
wut
Z-trooper
BF2s' little helper
+209|6973|Denmark

Archer wrote:

wut
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7058|Alberta, Canada

https://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b386/derish14/Untitled-1.png

Total Height = 196px
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|6845|Washington, DC

Must kill.
OmniDeath
~
+726|6859

doesnt really "burn the eyes"
JakAttaK
csanva<3
+492|6541|England

OmniDeath wrote:

doesnt really "burn the eyes"
maybe it would if it was inverted
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6847|Finland

One thread is enough. This is like, the third?

Give it a rest. seriously.
I need around tree fiddy.
  • Index » 
  • Community » 
  • Graphics » 
  • The Reduction Of Siglateral Images Due To Inflation of Siglateral Size

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard