Poll

Should i buy BF2142

Yes39%39% - 48
No60%60% - 73
Total: 121
KrisPOLANDnorwida
Battlefield 2 killa'
+128|6549|SHAPE, Belgium
BF 2142 is shit!!
Dont buy it.
BF2 is still coolllllll.
And if you dont have any booster packs or SF, buy them.
Sniper-UK-Ghost
Ice Lolly Maniac
+30|6456|Bristol

KrisPOLANDnorwida wrote:

BF 2142 is shit!!
Dont buy it.
BF2 is still coolllllll.
And if you dont have any booster packs or SF, buy them.
... give

it

a

chance ... i did and its sooo much better than bf2
BakaBakaNeko2
Sniper Kitten Wins !
+16|6516|Malaysia
Give it a try if you tire of the endless jet/helo rape and want to focus on a more infantry based combat system.
Sniper-UK-Ghost
Ice Lolly Maniac
+30|6456|Bristol

BakaBakaNeko2 wrote:

Give it a try if you tire of the endless jet/helo rape and want to focus on a more infantry based combat system.
so right you are
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6689
Yes.

It is a refreshing break from BF2.

All the haters just expected it to be so similar to BF2 that its differences (like no overpowered vehicles).
_-_911_-_180891
Member
+540|6724|Shanghai, ethnicity=German

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:

Yes.

It is a refreshing break from BF2.

All the haters just expected it to be so similar to BF2 that its differences (like no overpowered vehicles).
./Win
Longbow
Member
+163|6868|Odessa, Ukraine
BF2 is more fun while BF2142 is more balanced + have various interesting devices BF2 havent .
2142 is just another , not better or worse then 2
aZWARt325
Banned
+7|6380|Long Beach, California USA
I say no why lot of reasons just plain out EA plus I hate future games I cant wait til they make a BF3/BF4 thats modern IF they do.
B-Scimitar
Defeating your warriors.
+116|6630|Espoo, Finland
It gets boring when you reach the Brig. General rank after playing couple of weeks.
Djbrown
Member
+129|6717|Adelaide, Aussieland
I was the same as you, i dont like CS and have had bf2 for ages, its the only game to keep me for hundreds of hours (except WoW, *shudders*)

for the first maybe 40 hours i loved it, ranking up every day was fun and so many weapons i couldnt remember all the names, but eventually the novelty of all the gadgets wears off, and its just plain annoying.

IMO, the game is far too noob friendly. everyone has these helmets, which when a squad member seen an enemy, thier location is traced on your HUD by a big red diamond. its so rediculously cheap, you can see people through walls and youll always have the element of surprise. Add that to FF off on claymores, Assault rifles which double up as rocket launchers, snipers with like 500x magnification, walkers which rape the shit out of everything, including air and light machine guns which get more accurate the longer you fire them, its a noobs paradise, and the game is infested with em.

unless you have a clan to play with, dont ever expect to get revived, resupplied or a squad leader who knows how to use a beacon.
']['error
Banned
+630|6865|The Netherlands
no it's the ghey
jord
Member
+2,382|6899|The North, beyond the wall.
It's a very clever game in that if you try a demo or play it at a friends house it can be very fun for a small amount of time.

It doesn't keep you entertained for more than 200 hours max.

You could say that whoever designed this game is a genius, making it so you try it and think it's awesome, only to get a few weeks of entertainment from it.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6689

jord wrote:

It doesn't keep you entertained for more than 200 hours max.
9/10 games don't keep most people entertained for more than 50 hours. 200 hours of fun is 4x what most games give you.
jord
Member
+2,382|6899|The North, beyond the wall.

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:

jord wrote:

It doesn't keep you entertained for more than 200 hours max.
9/10 games don't keep most people entertained for more than 50 hours. 200 hours of fun is 4x what most games give you.
The keyword is max.

I would imagine we're talking about Pc games? In which case they keep people entertained for a longer time.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6689

jord wrote:

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:

jord wrote:

It doesn't keep you entertained for more than 200 hours max.
9/10 games don't keep most people entertained for more than 50 hours. 200 hours of fun is 4x what most games give you.
The keyword is max.

I would imagine we're talking about Pc games? In which case they keep people entertained for a longer time.
I still stand by my statement.
jord
Member
+2,382|6899|The North, beyond the wall.

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:

jord wrote:

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:


9/10 games don't keep most people entertained for more than 50 hours. 200 hours of fun is 4x what most games give you.
The keyword is max.

I would imagine we're talking about Pc games? In which case they keep people entertained for a longer time.
I still stand by my statement.
Fair enough.

Would you agree that the way 2142 was designed was very clever?
heggs
Spamalamadingdong
+581|6610|New York

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:

jord wrote:

doctastrangelove1964 wrote:


9/10 games don't keep most people entertained for more than 50 hours. 200 hours of fun is 4x what most games give you.
The keyword is max.

I would imagine we're talking about Pc games? In which case they keep people entertained for a longer time.
I still stand by my statement.
I agree with the Docta, there are few games, even PC games, that can keep you entertained for more than 200 hours. In my opinion, getting over 50 hours out of a game makes the purchase worth it.
Remember Me As A Time Of Day

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard