Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6793|North Carolina
I think world demand will solve this problem soon enough.  Demand in and of itself will drive the price of gas to unbearable levels eventually, and then, people will have no choice but to consume less.

No extra tax is necessary....  unless you like to add insult to injury....
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7105|Riva, MD
Why don't we use some of that sugar cane oil stuff like Brazil does?  It's environmentally friendly and now makes up close to half of Brazil's national profit for sale of fuels.

Or maybe they could take some better action of implementing E85.  Though E85 seems somewhat impractical because only domestic engines support it, and even then GM is pretty much the only one that supports it.  There's also hardly any gas stations that have E85 pumps.  I haven't seen one yet and they've supposedly been popping up since like 2004.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6793|North Carolina
Those sound like great ideas to me.

Our corn crops could be somewhat converted to ethanol production -- that would help as well.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,068|7159|PNW

Harmor wrote:

Some people in the Green movement believe we should impose a $1.00/gallon gas tax to 'encourage' alternative fuels.
Which would still be cheaper than maintenance for a hybrid. That tax idea is ridiculous, because you're basically going to offer people two super-expensive choices, and they're going to stick with what they already have.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-06-15 21:18:51)

Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6833|The Land of Scott Walker

Turquoise wrote:

Those sound like great ideas to me.

Our corn crops could be somewhat converted to ethanol production -- that would help as well.
Already happening.  Ethanol 45 minutes from my house making it from corn.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6793|North Carolina

Stingray24 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Those sound like great ideas to me.

Our corn crops could be somewhat converted to ethanol production -- that would help as well.
Already happening.  Ethanol 45 minutes from my house making it from corn.
Good to know...  We also need to harness wind power in more areas as well as nuclear and solar power.

In addition to this, we need to implement stricter emission standards on power plants.
Pw.Sultan
Member
+15|6867|NC
didnt even read it but nothing is going to change until we get a new pres and inflation wont stop until we have another depression
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6927|byah
Ethanol and vegetable oil is going to be a bad fuel source in the future because the farmers basically have control over the economy. They can raise the prices how ever much they want and companies will have to buy it like the stupid gas companies now. Hydrogen powered cars is the way to go.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6834|Chicago, IL

The#1Spot wrote:

Ethanol and vegetable oil is going to be a bad fuel source in the future because the farmers basically have control over the economy. They can raise the prices how ever much they want and companies will have to buy it like the stupid gas companies now. Hydrogen powered cars is the way to go.
It is a bad choice, because it drives the cost of feed corn throught the roof, wich makes meat prices rise.

How about create a catalyst that converts carbon dioxide and water back into a viable hydrocarbon?  That's my future career...
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6793|North Carolina

The#1Spot wrote:

Ethanol and vegetable oil is going to be a bad fuel source in the future because the farmers basically have control over the economy. They can raise the prices how ever much they want and companies will have to buy it like the stupid gas companies now. Hydrogen powered cars is the way to go.
I trust farmers and agribusiness far more than I trust energy companies and Big Oil.

That being said, ethanol is a great transitional fuel source, but yes, it's not the end-all be-all solution.

Nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric power are all great alternatives as well.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6833|The Land of Scott Walker

S.Lythberg wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

Ethanol and vegetable oil is going to be a bad fuel source in the future because the farmers basically have control over the economy. They can raise the prices how ever much they want and companies will have to buy it like the stupid gas companies now. Hydrogen powered cars is the way to go.
It is a bad choice, because it drives the cost of feed corn throught the roof, wich makes meat prices rise.

How about create a catalyst that converts carbon dioxide and water back into a viable hydrocarbon?  That's my future career...
No matter what energy source we settle on, there will be a company producing it.  A human being with the capability of greed will be at the helm.  Nothing new here. 

Ethanol can be produced by things other than corn, such as sugar cane which is what Brazil is doing.  I've heard that things like wood chips and switchgrass are being researched as sources for ethanol production but haven't reached large scale production yet.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6969|SE London

_j5689_ wrote:

Why don't we use some of that sugar cane oil stuff like Brazil does?  It's environmentally friendly and now makes up close to half of Brazil's national profit for sale of fuels.

Or maybe they could take some better action of implementing E85.  Though E85 seems somewhat impractical because only domestic engines support it, and even then GM is pretty much the only one that supports it.  There's also hardly any gas stations that have E85 pumps.  I haven't seen one yet and they've supposedly been popping up since like 2004.
I don't think large scale Biofuel production works out any better than fossil fuel use. But at least is a step away from dependence on oil.
[PTG]shogun
PS n00b & proud vista user
+44|6820

RAVAGE wrote:

Read it: Public transportation: good, like Europe.
lol dont make me laugh
public transport in everyware except switerland is crap tbh
blisteringsilence
I'd rather hunt with Cheney than ride with Kennedy
+83|7089|Little Rock, Arkansas

RAVAGE wrote:

Private vehicle is one of the biggest pollutants, at the same time its "usefulness" to economic growth is one of the smallest.

Read it: Public transportation: good, like Europe.
Well......

Public transportation is indeed good, if you live somewhere it is viable. I live 25 miles from where I work. There is no public transportation from my city to Little Rock. So, you have to drive.

And, no one here has mentioned the fact that the US depends on trucks to transport our goods. Any rise in fuel prices gets passed immeadiatly along to the customer.

konfusion wrote:

Put a higher tax on cars... Wouldn't that work?

-konfusion
No

Spark wrote:

Harmor wrote:

What is LPG?  Low Polluting Gas?
What?! You don't even know what LPG is?!

My god.
Here in the US, it's called propane, or natural gas. The only place you might see LPG is on a train car or a ship in port.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard