as an entree of this round....i thank youZ-trooper wrote:
hmm, MDFSpacePhantom should have entered.. the "worst" of his, would stand a pretty good chance of winning this round..Entertayner wrote:
Entry no. 10 by Fosterthelegend has been disqualified for stealing others' work. See here.
Poll
BF2s SotW #9
| 1 | 3% | 3% - 4 | ||||
| 2 | 5% | 5% - 7 | ||||
| 3 | 4% | 4% - 6 | ||||
| 4 | 39% | 39% - 51 | ||||
| 5 | 3% | 3% - 5 | ||||
| 6 | 1% | 1% - 2 | ||||
| 7 | 13% | 13% - 17 | ||||
| 8 | 1% | 1% - 2 | ||||
| 9 | 20% | 20% - 26 | ||||
| 10 | 7% | 7% - 10 | ||||
| Total: 130 | ||||||
nr.9! PAINT FTW!
not that I blame you or anything cause the sig you voted for is absolutly one of the best but as we found out last week, users that have used photobucket can be identifyed simply by looking at the patch to the image.. hint hintmkxiii wrote:
dammit the others are good..i voted 7
You only figured that out last week? You guys are sloooooooooow.
haha, i was trying to use mob psychology. my hope was everyone would go, yeah that one amazing!!! lets vote for it......twelve times!!! and i'd be like 'Yeahhhhh!!!!' with my sotw winners userbar displayed proudly.Z-trooper wrote:
not that I blame you or anything cause the sig you voted for is absolutly one of the best but as we found out last week, users that have used photobucket can be identifyed simply by looking at the patch to the image.. hint hintmkxiii wrote:
dammit the others are good..i voted 7
it didnt work
I got beaten by someone using paint!!!! i must really suck
you dont suck at all, your sig would have been my 2nd choice practice makes perfect, but in the "art" of sig-making you can (imo) never become perfect because there are always challanges out there..mkxiii wrote:
haha, i was trying to use mob psychology. my hope was everyone would go, yeah that one amazing!!! lets vote for it......twelve times!!! and i'd be like 'Yeahhhhh!!!!' with my sotw winners userbar displayed proudly.Z-trooper wrote:
not that I blame you or anything cause the sig you voted for is absolutly one of the best but as we found out last week, users that have used photobucket can be identifyed simply by looking at the patch to the image.. hint hintmkxiii wrote:
dammit the others are good..i voted 7
it didnt work
I got beaten by someone using paint!!!! i must really suck
EDIT:
oh well, I found out..Entertayner wrote:
You only figured that out last week? You guys are sloooooooooow.
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-06-04 13:39:43)
Just a hint:
Don't right click.
#4 anyways.
Don't right click.
#4 anyways.
#4, it's hawt.
Entertayner,
maybe you should create a Photobucket accout named sotw or somthing and just add the entries to that, to avoid any of these, "I can see who made that" arguments.
maybe you should create a Photobucket accout named sotw or somthing and just add the entries to that, to avoid any of these, "I can see who made that" arguments.
Just be fair and don't right click.Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Entertayner,
maybe you should create a Photobucket accout named sotw or somthing and just add the entries to that, to avoid any of these, "I can see who made that" arguments.
2, 3, or 4. Hard to choose.
I think 4 is the best out of the three though; 2 is interesting and somewhat amusing, but lacks in the "wow" aspect, I like the colors and the simplicity of 3, but one could say it is too simple.
I think 4 is the best out of the three though; 2 is interesting and somewhat amusing, but lacks in the "wow" aspect, I like the colors and the simplicity of 3, but one could say it is too simple.
Yes, because that seems to be working....Ryan wrote:
Just be fair and don't right click.Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Entertayner,
maybe you should create a Photobucket accout named sotw or somthing and just add the entries to that, to avoid any of these, "I can see who made that" arguments.
I agree, that ain't fair, I mean last time after everyone knew about it, I start seeing the voting for omni's sig increasing....Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Yes, because that seems to be working....Ryan wrote:
Just be fair and don't right click.Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Entertayner,
maybe you should create a Photobucket accout named sotw or somthing and just add the entries to that, to avoid any of these, "I can see who made that" arguments.
#2
dosent bother me, just seems like the last few weeks, the arguments havent been over which sig is better, or style of sig, but about the names you see when you scroll over the sig.rabee2789b wrote:
I agree, that ain't fair, I mean last time after everyone knew about it, I start seeing the voting for omni's sig increasing....Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Yes, because that seems to be working....Ryan wrote:
Just be fair and don't right click.
people can vote for someone they know or like for all I care, Just thought I'd put forward a possible solution to this situation.
I don't care as well tbh, as I know that I ain't that great and I just start learning and practising. And I am not in this SotW.Nicholas Langdon wrote:
dosent bother me, just seems like the last few weeks, the arguments havent been over which sig is better, or style of sig, but about the names you see when you scroll over the sig.rabee2789b wrote:
I agree, that ain't fair, I mean last time after everyone knew about it, I start seeing the voting for omni's sig increasing....Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Yes, because that seems to be working....
people can vote for someone they know or like for all I care, Just thought I'd put forward a possible solution to this situation.
Number 9 has 1337 wrote all over it!
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
so what are you saying? mine arent good enough to win otherwise?rabee2789b wrote:
I agree, that ain't fair, I mean last time after everyone knew about it, I start seeing the voting for omni's sig increasing....Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Yes, because that seems to be working....Ryan wrote:
Just be fair and don't right click.
Haha, I didn't know about that...OmniDeath wrote:
so what are you saying? mine arent good enough to win otherwise?rabee2789b wrote:
I agree, that ain't fair, I mean last time after everyone knew about it, I start seeing the voting for omni's sig increasing....Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Yes, because that seems to be working....
Maybe the Thread starter should host all the pics on his Photobucket account instead.
No, I am not saying that, I am talking about the last SotW. I don't really like the sigs in this SotW. Now, I am not saying you suck at making sig, in fact you are one of the best along with konfusion, tanyer and others. And looking at the thread that you made where people can request sigs from you, it seems that you are a very experienced PS person.OmniDeath wrote:
so what are you saying? mine arent good enough to win otherwise?rabee2789b wrote:
I agree, that ain't fair, I mean last time after everyone knew about it, I start seeing the voting for omni's sig increasing....Nicholas Langdon wrote:
Yes, because that seems to be working....
8.
sorry guysEntertayner wrote:
Entry no. 10 by Fosterthelegend has been disqualified for stealing others' work. See here.
1)i mad ethis a loong time ago, so i just dug it out and sent it to tayner
2)didnt realise it had to be totally original
3) i will read the rulez next time
this one was as "exciting" as some others.
Since I didn't win anyway - mine was number 3. My try of going for simplicity obviously wasn't as successful as I would have hoped
-konfusion
-konfusion
No you never?Fosterthelegend wrote:
sorry guysEntertayner wrote:
Entry no. 10 by Fosterthelegend has been disqualified for stealing others' work. See here.
1)i mad ethis a loong time ago, so i just dug it out and sent it to tayner
2)didnt realise it had to be totally original
3) i will read the rulez next time