roadrunner?, although not 128 terabyte but over 1 petaflop. something around 17,000 opteron cores, and 17,000 cell procs.leetkyle wrote:
Didn't Intel recently make a 128TB processor?-101-InvaderZim wrote:
Yeah u can - im pretty sure a $2mil Cray2 will keep u going for a fair few years as a gaming rigleetkyle wrote:
You'll never get a rig that is future proof.
Last edited by tehz (2007-05-18 11:09:40)
I have 4 days left in my step-up upgrade window, I'm thinking about grabbing a 8800GTX also.SoC./Omega wrote:
Okay, for NOW I have decided to go with the EVGA 8800GTX and overclock it myself, and get an e6400 CPU and overclock it myself. The problem is, I have never overclocked anything, and I am worried about screwing up and blowing basically 700 bucks. If I overclock it myself and I need help, I will find someone to help me I guess...
Ram is AMD's problem with the memory controller. 400mhz X2 = 800mhz. It's because of the dual channel ram.Ridir wrote:
you need at least DDR2 ram, DDR3 is already on the market in limited numbers
btw it says that my pc-6400 ram is running at 400 but when i start up the CPU and the test runs to test memory, IDE, sata drives and cpu it says it runs at 742 mhz, solutions?
yeah. higher ram speed ftw. and the 800mhz ram is as cheap/or even cheaper than 667Bertster7 wrote:
Exactly.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
You make no sense. Higher speed ram = win. I don't know what you're smoking.[TUF]Whiskey_Oktober wrote:
because of the FSB...getting ram that runs over 667MHz right now is a waste, assuming you run it in dual-channel.
I dunno what you're talking about, because of the FSB? wtf? You need higher speed RAM because of the high FSBs, especially when OCing.