Jello.01
Member
+46|7079|DFW, Texas
The Radeon HD 2900XT Is out. You just have to go through the search feature to get to it...
https://i5.tinypic.com/53s11qa.png

Go here
Then,
https://i3.tinypic.com/537ex68.jpg

Last edited by Jello.01 (2007-05-13 23:53:09)

Mitch92uK
aka [DBS]Mitch92uK
+192|6706|United Kingdom
"We have found 0 items that match your search criteria """."
PvtStPoK
paintball > bf2
+48|6985|montreal, quebec

nothing?
Jello.01
Member
+46|7079|DFW, Texas
...Hold on then, let me get that screenshot...
KuSTaV
noice
+947|6982|Gold Coast
Imagine how much its gonna cost. Spare leg anyone?
noice                                                                                                        https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/awsmsanta.png
Jello.01
Member
+46|7079|DFW, Texas

KuSTaV wrote:

Imagine how much its gonna cost. Spare leg anyone?
It is showing about $410
Dangles
Member
+3|6672
was out?

*EDIT* i see, you've updated

Last edited by Dangles (2007-05-13 23:50:49)

Jello.01
Member
+46|7079|DFW, Texas
Updated once more
cablecopulate
Member
+449|7209|Massachusetts.
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.h … VzaWFzdA==

Here is what it boils down to. If the Radeon HD 2900 XT performed exactly on par with the GeForce 8800 GTS in every game, it would still be a loser because it draws nearly 100 more watts of power, meaning it is very inefficient. The facts are though that it doesn’t even match the 8800 GTS currently. In every game it slides in underperforming compared to the GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB, and it does it while drawing a lot more power, as much power or more as an 8800 GTX. Not only that, but a GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB based video card can now be had for up to $70 cheaper than the Radeon HD 2900 XT. I don’t know about you, but a video card that is cheaper, runs a lot faster and draws less energy just seems like the better value to me.
MECtallica
Member
+73|6975|jalalabad
lol, just think of that the power consumption on the 2900xtx will be XD
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7120

It's vastly overrated, get an 8800.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6694|Escea

As we're on the subject of graphics cards, I was wondering if anyone could explain to me why my Nvidia 256MB 6800 cost more than a 512MB 7900. Also is £132 a resonable price for a PNY GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB, and is that a good card? I know nothing about the technical stuff in my comp.

Last edited by M.O.A.B (2007-05-14 13:29:24)

Pernicious544
Zee Tank Skank
+80|7171|MoVal So-Cal
The 2900 is a piece of shit, 8800 out performs it by a mile
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|7008|Long Island, New York
I'll stick with my 8800 GTX.

Last edited by Poseidon (2007-05-15 10:59:41)

Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|7094|Camp XRay

too bad it sucks
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
Dauntless
Admin
+2,249|7213|London

Poseidon wrote:

I'll stick with my 8800 GTX. ATI will never be up to par with nVidia.
I wouldn't say never...

But certainly for the time being.
https://imgur.com/kXTNQ8D.png
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6757|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
You are right, THE video card is out, and it has been for a while.. the name is 8800GTX !!

Last edited by ShawN_ (2007-05-14 13:50:04)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6964|N. Ireland
old news. already on overclockers at 279 quid (rip!), and this was posted by 69th a while back WITH review links holding links to ZIPZOOMFLY etc which HAVE it.
jimmanycricket
EBC Member
+56|7126|Cambridge, England

Pernicious544 wrote:

The 2900 is a piece of shit, 8800 out performs it by a mile
Not by a mile, but the 2900 is alot cheaper then the 8800gtx and is still using poor drivers.
theknuck
It's pronounced Knuck, like in Knuckle!!
+45|7083|balls
hmm, more money, more power consumption, and beat out by 8800gts (640mb).  kind of a no brainer here.  lets move on.
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|7036|Area 51

theknuck wrote:

hmm, more money, more power consumption, and beat out by 8800gts (640mb).  kind of a no brainer here.  lets move on.
As I saw in different test with some kind of drivers, on Non AA test it beat the 8800GTS with only a little bit and vica versa, but when using AA on with the drivers that ATI deliver it had beaten the GTS by a mile.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|7020|UK

Wait for the drivers to mature, its not as simple yet, the 1950xtx was beating it in call of duty 2 benchmarks which proves its got a lot to do with the driver's (cant think why in a product 6months late to market, but alas that is one of there problems).  Also, comparing dx10 cards on dx9 games wont give you the full picture.

Give it time (which ATI really dont have soooooo I'd expect those drivers to be sorted pretty quickly).

Martyn
mikeyb118
Evil Overlord
+76|7069|S.C.
As said above the 8800 GTS can beat this card in some tests, its a shame its not as good as ATIAMD said it would be, now they blame it on poor drivers!! When developing better drivers than the early 8800 drivers was the excuse for delaying this lump of red slowness!!! Maybe AMD should hold off making some of their marketing employees redundant. Now the wait is over i'll just buy an 8800 gtx.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7120

I guess the DAAMIT fanboi's must be kinda pissed...
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7188|Riva, MD
I heard somewhere that it is underperforming right now because of the drivers.  Could be a lie though.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard