CameronPoe wrote:
It would be funny to listen to lowing squirm the issue of a nation of 'Nuevo Mexico' being created through force in Arizona or California using his tired reasoning.
CameronPoe wrote:
You're trying to tell us that Palestinians aren't tired, weak, persecuted underdogs. What a joke.
These quotes betray a significant misunderstanding about Israel and Jews. A "Nuevo Mexico" in California would be different from Israel in critically significant ways. I'm sure you are well aware of the history, but your comments about Mexicans and Palestinians seem to ignore the fact that hatred and violence against Jews is unlike anything Mexicans or Palestinians have experienced or will experience in the foreseeable future. Lots of peoples have been treated brutally, but Jews were persecuted in almost every country for more than a thousand years, demonized, assaulted and expelled from numerous countries, then murdered on an industrial scale while the world stood by and did nothing. If Mexicans or Palestinians were treated like this (for over a thousand years!), I would give serious thought to the creation of a Nuevo Mexico or Palestinian homeland where Mexicans or Palestinians would be safe from future persecution. I would see it as a moral obligation. Don't misunderstand, the point isn't how groups have been treated in the past, it is how we can reasonably expect groups to be treated in the
future. Many Jews (including myself) do not think the centuries of persecution ended in 1945. Many Jews do not think the world is so civilized that persecution of Jews won't happen again. That's what Israel is for, to create a place where Jews will be safe. It's fine to debate about Israel, but the "Nuevo Mexico" analogy and the equation of Palestinian persecution to Jewish persecution creates a straw man by missing this fundamental point.