Anfidurl wrote:
fadedsteve wrote:
Silly liberals. . . .Stick to what your good at!! Undermining our military and its commanders in a combat zone. Not too mention taking our money and redistributing it without any checks and balances to see if the money gets well spent. Because in all honestly, spending our money with no recourse just FEELS right doesnt it guys. . . .
Anfidurl wrote:
Pardon me?
*LIBERALS didn't send troops into Iraq with insufficient body armour and thin-skinned humvees.
Keep in mind I can only speak of the United States.
It is the liberal who is responsible for all cuts in defense spending.
Liberals opposed every single defense spending bill and anything ever produced for our Armed Forces. Had it been left to them we would have no Army. They also said the M1 Abrams and F15 was a waste of money and would be useless in real battle. Tired of the lack of acknowledging these things.
Anfidurl wrote:
*LIBERALS didn't undermine the war in Afghanistan by diverting resources to an ill-advised, pretexted war in Iraq.
Ill advised? Only history will bear this out. Only when secret documents, satellite photos and all the intelligence is released will we know, we only found out about the Broken codes and Enemy agents we turned throughout W.W.II in the late 1960s. Till then your opinion is as good as anyone else's but its just your opinion
Anfidurl wrote:
*LIBERALS didn't hand out HUNDREDS of no-bid contracts to Halliberton subsidiary KBR,
They were one of the only Cooperation's who could handle a contract that size so quickly without a spool up time, and drinking water and sewers is pretty important.
Anfidurl wrote:
nor did LIBERALS decide it wasn't their place not to argue when said contracts were paid but not carried out.
1st I have heard of that, Are you referring to work that stoppages due to terrorist attacks?
Anfidurl wrote:
*LIBERALS didn't eliminate checks and balances through questionable signing statements.
They do routinely bypass checks and balances with end runs through the supreme court. as far as I know my congressman had little effect in bussing abortion etc.
Anfidurl wrote:
*LIBERALS understand that technology can be used for both good and for bad, hence allowing teachers and parents to control said use of said technology, allowing it to be well utilized.
I don't know what this refers too? But they are heavy on censorship themselves.
The 911 film, edited by former President clinton, the 911 fund raiser where the clinton's were booed and jeered at was edited out at showing. The Hush Rush law.
The real frustration in arguing is the lack of acknowledging when history proves them Wrong.
They washed their hands to The plight of the Montognards [sp] and Boat people and the massacres that occurred in Vietnam and Cambodia after they Bleed our efforts dry in that region.
They say "only massive infusions of funds " will fix the Corrupt missmanaged debacles that their pet projects they hold power and sway over ( like Public housing, welfare, school lunches, Parol for violent felons, the NYC Public school system ) have become.
It always takes us years of wasted money and lives to recover from their good intentioned, taxpayer funded, experiments that failed.
Their Mascot and pet " Communism " has been greatly assisted through their efforts.
We know now Sen. McCarthy was after real Soviet agents. Released Documentation from the Defunct USSR bears him out. History bears him out. Is this acknowledge or are our school children still reading " " the Crucible " a dark comenntary on the red scare and McCarthyisim "
The USSR was up to a lot of really evil shit. They kept thousands of US soldiers captive from POW camps they liberated during WWII and never returned them. They were Responsible for the Deaths of more Jews than Hitler. They destroyed the lives of their own citizens for Generations. Yet we had to listen to years of empty phrases from liberals like" Russian mothers love their babies too " Russian mothers didn't get to vote.
Anfidurl wrote:
So yeah, care to do a little research next time? Like to ditch the strawman and ad-hom. attacks?
Or in other words, GET YOUR BLOODY FACTS STRAIGHT!
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2007-04-09 14:17:59)