(revive)
Last edited by RAIMIUS (2007-04-04 17:43:43)
YAK-141 Freestyle
Last edited by bob_6012 (2007-04-05 03:19:45)
Hmm. A Pucara?
It's SOME kind of cheap ground-attack jet. Has to be current, as previously it was the OV-10 Bronco, which had turboprops. And cheap, because it's not an A=10 or a Frogfoot.
Also, it's got a tag on the nose and on various weapons. THAT marks it as in service.
It's SOME kind of cheap ground-attack jet. Has to be current, as previously it was the OV-10 Bronco, which had turboprops. And cheap, because it's not an A=10 or a Frogfoot.
Also, it's got a tag on the nose and on various weapons. THAT marks it as in service.
No, it's not a Pucara. Those tags are just covers for the various ports on the aircraft to prevent them from becoming clogged.
Cessna A-37 Dragonfly
~Vietnam era
Is that one de-militarized or still in use? (Those look like fuel tanks to me.)
~Vietnam era
Is that one de-militarized or still in use? (Those look like fuel tanks to me.)
Last edited by RAIMIUS (2007-04-05 10:29:13)
How about a Hawker Hunter?
Correct!!! It's still in flying condition, it was at out local airshow a few years back. De-militarized yes. I'm not sure but I think some of the tanks are actually converted to carry personal effects. However I do believe that some still were fuel tanks.RAIMIUS wrote:
Cessna A-37 Dragonfly
~Vietnam era
Is that one de-militarized or still in use? (Those look like fuel tanks to me.)
and an easy one...
Last edited by RAIMIUS (2007-04-06 05:59:16)
RA-5C Vigilante. It's at the top of the picture.
Yeah, dang it! I didn't notice that until I posted it! You're too fast!
The other one's blatantly a pair of P-51Ds. Lovely aircraft, although they were designed specially to do a role the P-38 could do easily years before, but without freezing the pilot.
your wrong about the first one btw..i looked it up and its wrong woops my bad..Skorpy-chan wrote:
Well, the first one's an F-100 Super-saber. Possibly a trainer variant, due to the dual canopies.
The last one, a DeHavilland Vampire.
C-130 in your sig
I used to build the J model.evilcartman99 wrote:
C-130 in your sig
really thats awesomefitz8402 wrote:
I used to build the J model.evilcartman99 wrote:
C-130 in your sig