Argh... This is a one page debate on the difference between a journalist and a commentator.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- And The Title For Worst Journalist In The World Goes To......
Thats good. It means everyone is in agreement with my stance on Bill O'Reilly being the worst journalist in the world.Spark wrote:
Argh... This is a one page debate on the difference between a journalist and a commentator.
Even worse than Geraldo. Dun Dun DUUUUUNNN!!
You can't deny the 'stache!Cougar wrote:
Thats good. It means everyone is in agreement with my stance on Bill O'Reilly being the worst journalist in the world.Spark wrote:
Argh... This is a one page debate on the difference between a journalist and a commentator.
Even worse than Geraldo. Dun Dun DUUUUUNNN!!
Here's what I think about Geraldo, I think the guy has an excuse for being a crappy journalist.Masques wrote:
You can't deny the 'stache!Cougar wrote:
Thats good. It means everyone is in agreement with my stance on Bill O'Reilly being the worst journalist in the world.Spark wrote:
Argh... This is a one page debate on the difference between a journalist and a commentator.
Even worse than Geraldo. Dun Dun DUUUUUNNN!!
He's stupid.
I mean, the hooplah over Al Capone's long lost vault....that could have been kind of cool if it had worked out, but it didn't. Not Geraldo's fault really..
The whole "drawing our position in the sand incident", was because he is just an idiot. You can't knock someone for having a birth defect (stupidity), thats like laughing at a crippled kid in a wheelchair because you can out run them.
The whole "I'm crying at the sight of children stranded by Hurricane Katrina" thing, I mean, he has a heart, but once again, lost his bearing on national TV because he's stupid.
And finally, saying that he wished child molestors would be lynched.......his heart is in the right place but there is no one home upstairs.
Bill O'Reilly on the other hand, knows what he is saying, doesn't care and is just a bad journalist period, because he can't respect another persons opinion. He makes mistakes and then doesn't correct them, instead repeating them over and over and then playing them off. Etc etc etc.
Bill O'Reilly is, put simply, not just a bad journalist but a bad human being. Period.
Just because you liberals disagree with him, doesnt mean he is a bad reporter/journalist whatever. . .
The guy has the biggest viewership in the USA. . . period, no one comes close to his audience.
He blows away his competition, so he must be doing something right. . . .cause if he was the worst (as you left wing liberals think) nobody would be watching him. . . correct?
Funny thing is I bet half his audience IS liberals who hate him!!! lol, similar to Howard Stern, half of his listeners are Stern haters!!
I bet there are some guys from the New York Times, The LA Times, who could steal worst journalist title! Flat out hacks. . . .
Bottom line. . . O'Reilly is neither a reporter or a journalist, he is an entertainer. . .and a good one judging by his popularity day in and day out!
The guy has the biggest viewership in the USA. . . period, no one comes close to his audience.
He blows away his competition, so he must be doing something right. . . .cause if he was the worst (as you left wing liberals think) nobody would be watching him. . . correct?
Funny thing is I bet half his audience IS liberals who hate him!!! lol, similar to Howard Stern, half of his listeners are Stern haters!!
I bet there are some guys from the New York Times, The LA Times, who could steal worst journalist title! Flat out hacks. . . .
Bottom line. . . O'Reilly is neither a reporter or a journalist, he is an entertainer. . .and a good one judging by his popularity day in and day out!
Last edited by fadedsteve (2007-04-03 01:19:37)
I'm not a liberal. I'm actually quite conservative. Also, yes he is.fadedsteve wrote:
Just because you liberals disagree with him, doesnt mean he is a bad reporter/journalist whatever. . .
So? American Idol kills in the ratings, but is it a good show? Not really. He kills in the ratings because people want to see what a douche he is or they want to see how big of an ass he makes of himself. Go to youtube and type in his name and 17 pages worth of Bill O'Reilly fuck ups appear. Do the same for Anderson Cooper or someone less "douchebaggy" and hardly anything comes up. Why? Because news done right is boring, people want to see the Jerry Springer of the News World.fadedsteve wrote:
The guy has the biggest viewership in the USA. . . period, no one comes close to his audience.
See above. Also, once again, I'm not a liberal.fadedsteve wrote:
He blows away his competition, so he must be doing something right. . . .cause if he was the worst (as you left wing liberals think) nobody would be watching him. . . correct?
Yeah..........which proves my point.fadedsteve wrote:
Funny thing is I bet half his audience IS liberals who hate him!!! lol, similar to Howard Stern, half of his listeners are Stern haters!!
Yeah, actually he is, we've already proven that. If he was an entertainer, he would be on HBO or Showtime not a News network that claims to be Fair and Balanced, because Bill O'Reilly is neither of those. He's popular because he's a fuck up. No one likes Geraldo, but how in the hell do you think he's stayed on the air for 20+years? Because he's a fuck up and people like to watch other people fuck up.fadedsteve wrote:
Bottom line. . . O'Reilly is neither a reporter or a journalist, he is an entertainer. . .and a good one judging by his popularity day in and day out!
mcminty wrote:
I watched a minute of the first video... he's a total idiot.
Mcminty.
QFT.djphetal wrote:
I hate him.
Passionately.
The guy is an idiot. One day he will just shove his fingers in his ears and yell 'LA LA LA NOT LISTENING' and so an and so forth, just like a pre-schooler.
Its a pity he has the ability to turn his 'guests' microphones off, other wise i think we would have seen this tactic sooner.
I'm moderate towards right of center in my political views but I agree 100% that O'Reilly is fucking retard.Cougar wrote:
Personally, I think Bill O'Reilly and Bill Mahr should be put on a boat together in the middle of the ocean and made to fight to the death.
I'm a republican and he is without a doubt a bad reporter/journalist. And beyond that he's just an arrogant prick. Bill O'Reilly is bad for moderate conservatives.fadedsteve wrote:
Just because you liberals disagree with him, doesnt mean he is a bad reporter/journalist whatever. . .
Even funnier is that you've blatantly contradicted yourself. You've tried to prove that high ratings = popularity, and then say that high ratings are due to unpopularity!The guy has the biggest viewership in the USA. . . period, no one comes close to his audience.
He blows away his competition, so he must be doing something right. . . .cause if he was the worst (as you left wing liberals think) nobody would be watching him. . . correct?
Funny thing is I bet half his audience IS liberals who hate him!!! lol, similar to Howard Stern, half of his listeners are Stern haters!!
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
lol that guy on the MSNBC owned him like a bitch.
You saying you actually think he's a good presenter/commentator/journalist/whateverthehellheis?usmarine2007 wrote:
Cool thing is, you don't have to watch him. Simple enough.
LOL, vid. #3...
Keith Olbermann called him the “Sisyphus of Morons”…
Albert Camus (The Myth of Sisyphus): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Sisyphus
Keith Olbermann called him the “Sisyphus of Morons”…
Albert Camus (The Myth of Sisyphus): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Sisyphus
Sisyphus, from Greek mythology, was condemned for eternity to repeat the same meaningless task of pushing a rock up a mountain, only to see it roll down again.
No. I am saying it is simple enough not to watch him, which it turn means you do not have to give two shits about what he says.ghettoperson wrote:
You saying you actually think he's a good presenter/commentator/journalist/whateverthehellheis?usmarine2007 wrote:
Cool thing is, you don't have to watch him. Simple enough.
Thats too hard for people/liberals though. . . .For instance, I dont watch Wolf Bitzer, cause I think he is a liberal hack. Nor did watch Dan Rather cause he is one too. . .usmarine2007 wrote:
No. I am saying it is simple enough not to watch him, which it turn means you do not have to give two shits about what he says.ghettoperson wrote:
You saying you actually think he's a good presenter/commentator/journalist/whateverthehellheis?usmarine2007 wrote:
Cool thing is, you don't have to watch him. Simple enough.
You know how I was able to keep those two douche bags out of my life, and not be too worried about it?. . .EASY!! I didnt watch they're program(s). . . . .
He goes after pedophiles and talks about tough border policy. Yea.. that's about it..
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Totally agree, wtf was the editor thinkin, I would of cut his mic off! And the NBC presenter hut the nail on the head (or atleast the propter writer).
Martyn
Martyn
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- And The Title For Worst Journalist In The World Goes To......