More political posturing. The article mentions he's running in 08. That is all.
I'm waiting to see what else people have coincidentally planned for September '08.Stingray24 wrote:
More political posturing.
Lol....your own party is just doing it for politics huh? Alrighty.
King Bush. All hail.
King Bush. All hail.
Of course it's for politics, just like every other election. It's quite obvious that it's for politics and that Hagel is attempting to distance himself from Bush to gain votes later on.
Btw, the Reps are not my party, if there was a viable independent candidate that I agree with I'd gladly vote for him/her. But a third party has no chance of winning in our two party dominated system, so I vote for the lesser of two evils.
Btw, the Reps are not my party, if there was a viable independent candidate that I agree with I'd gladly vote for him/her. But a third party has no chance of winning in our two party dominated system, so I vote for the lesser of two evils.
Bush hasnt done anything illegal while in office....yet. And until then there are no grounds for impeachment.
Debatable.Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
Bush hasnt done anything illegal while in office
I think there is a certain level of denial by the sheeple in this country. Despite Congress attempting to curb the war towards an end, Bush's own party speaking against him, the constant lies he has stated to your face, an apparent abuse of the Patriot Act according to new reports, and some sort of shit going on with Gonzalez that no one is allowed to fully investigate, you still will find any excuse on why a critic says what he/she says about Bush.
Can that many critics really be that crazy? Or are you crazy?
Last edited by Mason4Assassin444 (2007-03-27 08:29:42)
I hate bush just as much as any critic so far tehre has been no evidence that he ever did anything to an illegal extent
Never gonna happen so get over it.
To be quite clear, there have been opportunities for it to happen. Such as the ILLEGAL wire tapping. But you believed that was for your safety so you laughed it off. Now we hear they have abused the powers provided by the Patriot Act. Weird.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Never gonna happen so get over it.
Just assume its not unfeasible that your President has f-d you in the a. And your liking it.
Hagel is not alone. I was watching C-Span last night and there were some prominent professors on there outlining how many actions taken by Bush can be interpreted as High Crimes and Misdemeanor's. This sentiment is growing profoundly.
Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
To be quite clear, there have been opportunities for it to happen. Such as the ILLEGAL wire tapping. But you believed that was for your safety so you laughed it off. Now we hear they have abused the powers provided by the Patriot Act. Weird.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Never gonna happen so get over it.
Just assume its not unfeasible that your President has f-d you in the a. And your liking it.
Do you know how much I hate it when you make me defend Bush's actions? Damn it, stop.GATOR591957 wrote:
Hagel is not alone. I was watching C-Span last night and there were some prominent professors on there outlining how many actions taken by Bush can be interpreted as High Crimes and Misdemeanor's. This sentiment is growing profoundly.
He hasn't broken any laws. The wiretaps weren't illegal. I think they SHOULD have been illegal, but they weren't. Get over it. They abused the powers in the Patriot Act. Again, unethical, certainly. Illegal? No.
If you have to stretch the definition of High Crime and Misdemeanor, the President's not going to be impeached. A High Crime is a felony. A Misdemeanor is just that. We have very specific definitions of these laws. Clinton was impeached for violating a law. He commit perjury. Johnson was impeached for violating a law. He tried to do an end run around Congress in his appointment to the Cabinet of the Secretary of War.
Can you say war crimes????blisteringsilence wrote:
Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
To be quite clear, there have been opportunities for it to happen. Such as the ILLEGAL wire tapping. But you believed that was for your safety so you laughed it off. Now we hear they have abused the powers provided by the Patriot Act. Weird.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Never gonna happen so get over it.
Just assume its not unfeasible that your President has f-d you in the a. And your liking it.Do you know how much I hate it when you make me defend Bush's actions? Damn it, stop.GATOR591957 wrote:
Hagel is not alone. I was watching C-Span last night and there were some prominent professors on there outlining how many actions taken by Bush can be interpreted as High Crimes and Misdemeanor's. This sentiment is growing profoundly.
He hasn't broken any laws. The wiretaps weren't illegal. I think they SHOULD have been illegal, but they weren't. Get over it. They abused the powers in the Patriot Act. Again, unethical, certainly. Illegal? No.
If you have to stretch the definition of High Crime and Misdemeanor, the President's not going to be impeached. A High Crime is a felony. A Misdemeanor is just that. We have very specific definitions of these laws. Clinton was impeached for violating a law. He commit perjury. Johnson was impeached for violating a law. He tried to do an end run around Congress in his appointment to the Cabinet of the Secretary of War.
Does unconstitutional mean illegal?blisteringsilence wrote:
He hasn't broken any laws. The wiretaps weren't illegal. I think they SHOULD have been illegal, but they weren't. Get over it.
NopeMason4Assassin444 wrote:
Does unconstitutional mean illegal?blisteringsilence wrote:
He hasn't broken any laws. The wiretaps weren't illegal. I think they SHOULD have been illegal, but they weren't. Get over it.
LOL...I concede.Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
NopeMason4Assassin444 wrote:
Does unconstitutional mean illegal?blisteringsilence wrote:
He hasn't broken any laws. The wiretaps weren't illegal. I think they SHOULD have been illegal, but they weren't. Get over it.
Chuck Hagel and Ron Paul are the 2 Republicans I admire most. They don't just follow the party line like so many others.
It happened twice before. Both democrats though.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Never gonna happen so get over it.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I was going to say he has you beaten...Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
LOL...I concede.Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
NopeMason4Assassin444 wrote:
Does unconstitutional mean illegal?
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.