BF2S Forums Children being 'used' in Iraq bombings

This is just one case. Hopefully it won't continue.

This is why these people are shitbag terrorists and nothing even close to resembling a freedom fighter.

Shows the lack of honor and human deceny in them.  For all thier rhetoric and propaganda, it just shows that they are nothing piece degenerate human beings.

Reminds me of the children with hand grenades strapped to them in Vietnam.

Blehm98 wrote:

max wrote:

I didn't think anyone could sink so low. Blowing up yourself and "enemy" soldiers is still somewhat justifiable I guess but using kids? That is just wrong

ahh, but the terrorists have been much more interested in blowing up civilians instead of enemy soldiers.  that is why they are terrorists

But they are killing their own civilians, and not worrying so much about killing American civilians, except for 911.

Last edited by Ryan (2007-03-24 09:26:59)

ATG wrote:

Demonstrates a need for collective punishment.

Goes like this. Attention people of city block ( insert # ) Insurgents are operating in your area. Report them to coalition authorities. Or engage them directly. Any attacks, bombing or shootings related to the insurgents in your area will result in the bombardment and destruction of your block without further warning.

Thank you, and have a nice jihad.


Extreme?

Historically occupying armies would hold a certain number of hostages to entice the population not to get out of line. If they did, they would execute the citizens being held captive. Harsh I know. But, are we fighting a war, or not?

1. Collective punishment doesn't work.
2. You would be a terrorist by the definition presented in this thread:

Blehm98 wrote:

ahh, but the terrorists have been much more interested in blowing up civilians instead of enemy soldiers.  that is why they are terrorists

If we are not going to fight to win lets get the fuck out.

ATG wrote:

If we are not going to fight to win lets get the fuck out.

Please explain with some depth what fighting to win really is. 

If you mean that defeating an insurgency that looks like the population, talks like the population, and has the support of the population, is impossible without nuking the country, then I agree with you.

ATG wrote:

Attention people of city block ( insert # ) Insurgents are operating in your area. Report them to coalition authorities. Or engage them directly. Any attacks, bombing or shootings related to the insurgents in your area will result in the bombardment and destruction of your block without further warning.

Wow. That sounds like it would come out of a movie, or "1984" or a game like Half-Life 2. Unbelievable that anyone could support an operation like that. Well, besides a nazi or something.

ATG wrote:

Demonstrates a need for collective punishment.

Goes like this. Attention people of city block ( insert # ) Insurgents are operating in your area. Report them to coalition authorities. Or engage them directly. Any attacks, bombing or shootings related to the insurgents in your area will result in the bombardment and destruction of your block without further warning.

Thank you, and have a nice jihad.

You sicken me.
While it is in no way just or honorable, doing that would be stooping not just to their level, but a whole lot lower.

What you could do to prevent this, is trying to infiltrate terrorist groups, or evacuate civilians out of suspected areas.

-konfusion

Konfusion0 wrote:

ATG wrote:

Demonstrates a need for collective punishment.

Goes like this. Attention people of city block ( insert # ) Insurgents are operating in your area. Report them to coalition authorities. Or engage them directly. Any attacks, bombing or shootings related to the insurgents in your area will result in the bombardment and destruction of your block without further warning.

Thank you, and have a nice jihad.

You sicken me.
While it is in no way just or honorable, doing that would be stooping not just to their level, but a whole lot lower.

What you could do to prevent this, is trying to infiltrate terrorist groups, or evacuate civilians out of suspected areas.

-konfusion

this would give the regular civilians a reason to turn in anyone who might be a terrorist.  It is a very intelligent plan and one i would support

you can't infiltrate terrorists groups, or we can't, because one of our prevuiys presidents made it illegal for someone who is not born in the US or a US citizen to work for the CIA

ATG wrote:

Demonstrates a need for collective punishment.

Goes like this. Attention people of city block ( insert # ) Insurgents are operating in your area. Report them to coalition authorities. Or engage them directly. Any attacks, bombing or shootings related to the insurgents in your area will result in the bombardment and destruction of your block without further warning.

Thank you, and have a nice jihad.


Extreme?

Historically occupying armies would hold a certain number of hostages to entice the population not to get out of line. If they did, they would execute the citizens being held captive. Harsh I know. But, are we fighting a war, or not?

This strategy would save countless lives in the long run and break the back of the Insurgency.

Democrats and Republicans would never use this tactic because this war on terror is merely a tool of politics and will continue to be until more US civilians die on a more regular basis or experience discomfort in their life styles that is attributed to the terrorists.  Then all hell will break loose and Americans will support nuking the whole fucking Middle East and Asia.  OMG gas hit $10 a gallon because a dirty bomb went off in Mecca and now I can't afford gas for my truck, my 1 hr. commute to the city, and my electric bill!!!!  Nuke those Fuckn terrorists and any civilians that are hiding them, because now I have to drive a VW bug.

Our troops will continue being cannon fodder due to the "Bambi" generation that has never faced the real world and only count our troops lives as intangible numbers and material for water cooler debate.