BF2S Forums Should Iraq talk to insurgents?

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

It appears to be a difficult task.  Who is your target?

Agreed...  I think we should get out of Iraq as soon as possible, since we can't stomach the brutality that would be required to actually "win" this conflict.

Now lets be accurate on this. It is the democrats that could not stomache a win in Iraq because that would surely mean defeat in 08. You know that is the truth, which is why I loath them so much. They use the lives of our troops for their politcal gains, that has nothing to do with the tasks charged to our military.

lowing wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Now lets be accurate on this. It is the democrats that could not stomache a win in Iraq because that would surely mean defeat in 08. You know that is the truth, which is why I loath them so much. They use the lives of our troops for their politcal gains, that has nothing to do with the tasks charged to our military.

OMFG


@ OP.

No. To late to talk.

What??!, Do you really think that a failure in Iraq, or on the war on terrorism, is  NOT essential, if the deomcrats are going to take back the White House? Is that such a radical notion or does truth sting a little?

Kmarion wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

It appears to be a difficult task.  Who is your target?

Agreed...  I think we should get out of Iraq as soon as possible, since we can't stomach the brutality that would be required to actually "win" this conflict.

If we left now I think we would see a brutality like nothing else we have witnessed since the invasion. Of course we should get out. But our sense of decency haunts us. Some do really care about the Iraqi people. Getting out without a government that has a chance will lay the ground work for genocide. There are politicians who play on our fears and tell us that when we leave Iraqi's will be swimming over to US soil. That is not why I think we need to be careful when speaking in terms of abandoning Iraqi.

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

OMFG


@ OP.

No. To late to talk.

What??!, Do you really think that a failure in Iraq, or on the war on terrorism, is  NOT essential, if the deomcrats are going to take back the White House? Is that such a radical notion or does truth sting a little?

Im not going into anything to offset the OP.

But if those troops don't come home soon, you may end up with Ralph Nader in the White House.

Last edited by G3|Genius (2007-03-21 20:01:46)

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Im not going into anything to offset the OP.

But if those troops don't come home soon, you may end up with Ralph Nader in the White House.

I wish...  that's not gonna happen though.

Some things are worth fighting for. I believe the fight against terrorism is a just and noble fight, a fight which, "bringing them home soon", will seriously curtail.