TerrorisT²
Melbourne Shuffler
+214|6597|Gold Coast, Australia




Take notice in the first video of the weapons that were found in possession of Saddam Hussein

Can't wait to see the full thing.

Last edited by TerrorisT² (2007-03-03 05:13:43)

BVC
Member
+325|6666
Scuds?  Those other rockets he had?  Big deal.

Last edited by Pubic (2007-03-03 05:54:45)

deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6464|Connecticut
That looks pretty intense, I would watch it.
Malloy must go
sfarrar33
Halogenoalkane
+57|6589|InGerLand
ooo interesting
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0494826/
As part of the first wave in the War on Terror, First Lieutenant Mike Scotti (awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal with Combat "V") served on the front lines during the 21 day advance to Baghdad. His experiences in Afghanistan as well as Iraq put him face to face with the sobering realities of war on a daily basis. Severe Clear offers an unflinching look at life on the battlefield through the eyes of someone who was there.  Written by Marc Perez
specops10-4
Member
+108|6714|In the hills
Something about the second video seemed... fake?  Just the noises and the way that the camera was moving smoothly, not jerking around.  I bet it is real, it just gave me some odd impression that it was fake.
JahManRed
wank
+646|6599|IRELAND

"To those that say Saddam has no weapons"  Who would that be? I seen him on TV with a side arm. Shit I thought you knew he had weapons seeing as Rummy sold them to him.
And that was an old scud missile.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6338|Columbus, Ohio

JahManRed wrote:

"To those that say Saddam has no weapons"  Who would that be? I seen him on TV with a side arm. Shit I thought you knew he had weapons seeing as Rummy sold them to him.
And that was an old scud missile.
Scuds can't carry biological warheads?  Hmmmmm..
_NL_Lt.EngineerFox
Big Mouth Prick
+219|6501|Golf 1.8 GTI Wolfsburg Edition
that sound on the radio you hear at the second vid on 29 seconds is from BFV:P
JahManRed
wank
+646|6599|IRELAND

usmarine2007 wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

"To those that say Saddam has no weapons"  Who would that be? I seen him on TV with a side arm. Shit I thought you knew he had weapons seeing as Rummy sold them to him.
And that was an old scud missile.
Scuds can't carry biological warheads?  Hmmmmm..
Did yous find a cache of those?
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6338|Columbus, Ohio

JahManRed wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

"To those that say Saddam has no weapons"  Who would that be? I seen him on TV with a side arm. Shit I thought you knew he had weapons seeing as Rummy sold them to him.
And that was an old scud missile.
Scuds can't carry biological warheads?  Hmmmmm..
Did yous find a cache of those?
Nope.
Fen321
Member
+54|6468|Singularity
"So much for him not having Weapons [OF MASS DESTRUCTION]" -Marine Had to add the important part to his comment.

COULD COULD COULD do you know what that implies????
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6572|132 and Bush

JahManRed wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

"To those that say Saddam has no weapons"  Who would that be? I seen him on TV with a side arm. Shit I thought you knew he had weapons seeing as Rummy sold them to him.
And that was an old scud missile.
Scuds can't carry biological warheads?  Hmmmmm..
Did yous find a cache of those?
The kurds did.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
JahManRed
wank
+646|6599|IRELAND

Kmarion wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:


Scuds can't carry biological warheads?  Hmmmmm..
Did yous find a cache of those?
The kurds did.
Who 'found them' after they revolted but were abandoned by the coalition GW1.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6532

usmarine2007 wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

"To those that say Saddam has no weapons"  Who would that be? I seen him on TV with a side arm. Shit I thought you knew he had weapons seeing as Rummy sold them to him.
And that was an old scud missile.
Scuds can't carry biological warheads?  Hmmmmm..
My ass can carry biological warheads, but I don't see anyone shocking and aweing the Victorian coast.
sfarrar33
Halogenoalkane
+57|6589|InGerLand

Bubbalo wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

"To those that say Saddam has no weapons"  Who would that be? I seen him on TV with a side arm. Shit I thought you knew he had weapons seeing as Rummy sold them to him.
And that was an old scud missile.
Scuds can't carry biological warheads?  Hmmmmm..
My ass can carry biological warheads, but I don't see anyone shocking and aweing the Victorian coast.
the tanks will be on your doorstep tomorrow
TerrorisT²
Melbourne Shuffler
+214|6597|Gold Coast, Australia
I wonder why this was covered up?

It's not like America is at a loss if they said they found some, In-fact it would be a gain because that would make they're reason to invade Iraq even better...
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6532
NOTHING WAS COVERED UP

The US did not find any WMDs.  End of story.
CC-Marley
Member
+407|6799
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6532
Heavily degraded and no longer usable as a long range weapon.  I'd hardly count that as a usable WMD (note that he says they are chemical weapons under international law, WMD is an opinion).
CC-Marley
Member
+407|6799
Degraded or not. I'm not gonna do a line of it. It'll still fuck you up. But you must agree that your statement was not accurate.
d3v1ldr1v3r13
Satan's disciple on Earth.
+160|6656|Hell's prison
With the right tools and equipment, even your pithy little "Scuds" can be outfitted for some major carnage, dont judge a book by its cover.  Its about fucking time someones gonna show the real story, and not some shitty bed time stories that CNN made up to terrify children.

Last edited by d3v1ldr1v3r13 (2007-03-04 23:58:51)

Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6532

CC-Marley wrote:

Degraded or not. I'm not gonna do a line of it. It'll still fuck you up
So will cocaine, is that a WMD?

CC-Marley wrote:

But you must agree that your statement was not accurate.
As you've just seen, no, I mustn't.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6645|Canberra, AUS
Orly?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134625,00.html

Straight from the horses mouth. I paticularly like this section: "U.S. officials also said the report shows Saddam was much farther away from a nuclear weapons program in 2003 than he was between 1991 and 1993; there is no evidence that Iraq and Al Qaeda exchanged weapons; and there is no evidence that Al Qaeda and Iraq shared information, technology or personnel in developing weapons."

More?

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/ … md.report/
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/do … 380248.htm
http://www.public-action.com/911/no-wmd-sdut/

And that was just clicking the first few links that came up.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl? … 22/1421212
http://www.csm.ornl.gov/PR/PR2004/NS-07-12-04.html
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=2123
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3718150.stm
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c … amp;nl=fix

Can I finish now? My Ctrl + C and V keys are getting worn out.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6526

CC-Marley wrote:

Degraded or not. I'm not gonna do a line of it. It'll still fuck you up. But you must agree that your statement was not accurate.
A WMD that is beyond use is not a WMD. It's an ex-WMD. It's a useless pile of crap. I suggest you look up the word 'logic' and the phrase 'common sense' in your nearest dictionary/encyclopaedia. I really don't get those folk who cling to the dream of WMDs, especially when President Lloyd Bridges concedes that they found nothing.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-03-05 01:44:43)

Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6645|Canberra, AUS

CameronPoe wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

Degraded or not. I'm not gonna do a line of it. It'll still fuck you up. But you must agree that your statement was not accurate.
A WMD that is beyond use is not a WMD. I suggest you look up the word 'logic' and the phrase 'common sense' in your nearest dictionary/encyclopaedia.
QFT.

A jammed gun is no use to anyone, correct? What makes WMD's different?

Last edited by Spark (2007-03-05 01:44:42)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard