usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6795|Columbus, Ohio
"Night after night they return for the carefree, beery vibe, with the same partners or new ones, creating a web of sexual interaction. A growing number of studies single out such behavior -- in which men and women maintain two or more ongoing relationships -- as the most powerful force propelling a killer disease through a vulnerable continent."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17407726/

Are we wasting our money trying to help Africa in the AIDS battle?
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6957|Global Command
I believe so, even though it is the right thing to do.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7009|SE London

Simple solution - Use the money to introduce mandatory global testing for AIDS and to establish special "happy camps" for those with AIDS. Problem solved.


No it's not an evil solution.....

silo1180
The Farewell Tour
+79|6850|San Antonio, TX
Perhaps this is another case where we need to try to stop it in our own country first.  There is no cure, I know there are "treatments" that can prolong life, but it's a virus and unfortunately like all viruses it can mutate so scientists really can't keep up with it.

So IMO to answer your question... yes.  We should be pumping that money into finding a cure for the disease instead of running around acting like we are doing something to help.
Ender2309
has joined the GOP
+470|6999|USA

silo1180 wrote:

Perhaps this is another case where we need to try to stop it in our own country first.  There is no cure, I know there are "treatments" that can prolong life, but it's a virus and unfortunately like all viruses it can mutate so scientists really can't keep up with it.

So IMO to answer your question... yes.  We should be pumping that money into finding a cure for the disease instead of running around acting like we are doing something to help.
no, we shouldnt be looking for a cure.

its a virus, and like all viruses, there is no cure.

first we need to cure the cold. then we can work on AIDS/HIV.

right now we should be trying to come up with a vaccination, to stop the spread of disease.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7056|IRELAND

Bertster7 wrote:

Simple solution - Use the money to introduce mandatory global testing for AIDS and to establish special "happy camps" for those with AIDS. Problem solved.


No it's not an evil solution.....

Did you quote that directly from Alan Bastard??

The developed world has a big aids problem, even with all the contraception, school educational projects, advertising campaigns etc. In Africa they get shit all information or direction apart from the odd charity organisation who puts most of their resources into building a new HQ were the staff get free fruit and massages on demand. Could be as bad here if we didn't get such info and every stage.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7029|132 and Bush

Who can tell me where this is from?

If we can put a man on the moon, then when can put a man with aids on the moon, then we can put everyone with aids on the moon.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6795|Columbus, Ohio

Kmarion wrote:

Who can tell me where this is from?

If we can put a man on the moon, then when can put a man with aids on the moon, then we can put everyone with aids on the moon.
Your ass.


Sarah Silverman
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7029|132 and Bush

usmarine2007 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Who can tell me where this is from?

If we can put a man on the moon, then when can put a man with aids on the moon, then we can put everyone with aids on the moon.
Your ass.


Sarah Silverman
lol.. u win +1
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6873|The Land of Scott Walker
Basic human selfishness on full display: people infecting others and destroying their own civilization because they won't refrain from sexual activity after they have the disease.
silo1180
The Farewell Tour
+79|6850|San Antonio, TX

Ender2309 wrote:

silo1180 wrote:

Perhaps this is another case where we need to try to stop it in our own country first.  There is no cure, I know there are "treatments" that can prolong life, but it's a virus and unfortunately like all viruses it can mutate so scientists really can't keep up with it.

So IMO to answer your question... yes.  We should be pumping that money into finding a cure for the disease instead of running around acting like we are doing something to help.
no, we shouldnt be looking for a cure.

its a virus, and like all viruses, there is no cure.

first we need to cure the cold. then we can work on AIDS/HIV.

right now we should be trying to come up with a vaccination, to stop the spread of disease.
Why waste time trying to cure the cold?  It's not usually lethal.  I sort of see your point in that we need to figure out how to stop a virus, and that is the basic virus, but why start at the bottom?

And as for the vaccination... again AIDS/HIV has already mutated.  You have to take into consideration our current vaccinations.  The flu for example... there are so many strains of the influenza virus it is not possible to guarantee you will not contract the flu that season/year with or without the shot.  A vaccination is a crap-shoot.  It's an OK buffer, but it's not a be-all-end-all for it.

JahManRed you are right on about the HQ.  That's why I hate giving to charities because such a large portion goes to things other than the actual cause.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7029|132 and Bush

silo1180 wrote:

its a virus, and like all viruses, there is no cure.
Has anyone tried AVG or norton yet?

Seriously though, the only way you can slow this down is by education and awareness. Only the people of Africa can accept it and change their lifestyle.

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-03-02 08:23:46)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Mitch
16 more years
+877|6953|South Florida
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!


Isn't the answer to..... STOP FUCKING!??!?!?!?!!?!!?!!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!


It's like hey Africans, if you dont wanna die, then dont stick it in her! Your choice! But don't come crying to America wanting a cure from us after we warned you what would happen.

Is this how it is? I dont really know
15 more years! 15 more years!
JahManRed
wank
+646|7056|IRELAND

Stingray24 wrote:

Basic human selfishness on full display: people infecting others and destroying their own civilization because they won't refrain from sexual activity after they have the disease.
Most of them don't realise they have H.I.V until full blown A.I.D.S kicks in. By that time they have infected. Its also ingrained in the African Male mentality that the more women you have the higher your stature in African society. Bare in mind that most of the people infect in Africa have never even seen a TV. They aren't spreading the disease on purpose, its ignorance, not selfishness.
Crazy-Madness
Member
+8|6912
I would kill all people with AIDS------------->  They have AIDS so they die     
and all Cripple..                       ------------->  Cripple-animals dont survive too


and if i could kill the humanity too i would do it
Mitch
16 more years
+877|6953|South Florida

Crazy-Madness wrote:

I would kill all people with AIDS------------->  They have AIDS so they die     
and all Cripple..                       ------------->  Cripple-animals dont survive too


and if i could kill the humanity too i would do it
Harsh.
How about, All AIDS carriers outside of the U.S.
Or just the AIDS carriers in Africa...

^^
I fear saying that last one cause it sounds a tad bit... racist....
15 more years! 15 more years!
Elamdri
The New Johnnie Cochran
+134|7074|Peoria
Yknow, maybe its just the scientist in me, but I think it is a little overarching to say that there is no cure for a virus. For all we know, there may be and we just haven't discovered it yet.

In the meantime, we have to examine the dilemma.

What is more important? The right of someone to keep their medical history private? Or the right of another human being to not be unwittingly infected by a deadly disease.

I personally feel that the second right is more important, and thus HIV bearers should be forced to disclose their disease to their partners before having sex. However, I don't know how you could do/enforce such a law without physically marking HIV+ individuals ala a "Scarlet Letter" type approach, but of course thats too Orwellian to be plausible.
Mitch
16 more years
+877|6953|South Florida

Elamdri wrote:

Yknow, maybe its just the scientist in me, but I think it is a little overarching to say that there is no cure for a virus. For all we know, there may be and we just haven't discovered it yet.

In the meantime, we have to examine the dilemma.

What is more important? The right of someone to keep their medical history private? Or the right of another human being to not be unwittingly infected by a deadly disease.

I personally feel that the second right is more important, and thus HIV bearers should be forced to disclose their disease to their partners before having sex. However, I don't know how you could do/enforce such a law without physically marking HIV+ individuals ala a "Scarlet Letter" type approach, but of course thats too Orwellian to be plausible.
Not really man, I agree. It's mindblowingly selfish for someone to not tell there partner there infected. I mean, if a chick did that to me i would kill her with a red hot knife.
But, of coarse, i don't think you could go around labeling people with AIDS. Treating them like cows getting numbers burned into them.
I wish the government would do something worthwhile for a change. Instead of banning 'nigger' in new york, maybe they can spend a little more time working on something that helps humanity.
I blame the liberals. The untallented money hungry commies who get elected, sit in there office, and make up stupid shit like "Banning the 'N' word" so they look like there helping the country.

More importantly, i blame religion severly for this, If the wack-job bible-slaved church goers werent spreading the word about how bad condoms are, and how its a sin to use a condom, then there would be a lot less trouble.

Oh!!! And dont get me started on schools!!!! Possibly THEE BEST place to teach young virgins about the risk of aids, but NO!!!! WE WOULDNT FUCKING WANT TO HAVE A LITTLE SEX ED.!!!! IT MIGHT FUCKING OFFEND SOMEONE!!!!!! That pisses me off more then you could fucking believe!!!!! Stupid-ass tree-hugging liberal, pussy, moms who complain to the schools because they dont want there kids learning about sex!! thus, the sex ed gets removed, thus kids go fucking away and get a kid at age 16...

People are so bent on 'not offending' that they dont realize they are PUSSYFYING there children!!! yes, pussyfying!! the act of turning one into a pussy!!

Here's a great example, here in liverpool new york, there was a kids basketball team, they were called the "Syracuse Bullies" with a bull in the background (l'pool is a suberb of syr) People complained that the bullies sounded like a mean name, and it might make kids go around beating people up!!!!! yes!!!!!! can you believe that bullshit!!!!!!!! This is an accurate quote from a mother they interviewed at the mall the other day
"Well, i think the bullies is a bad name, they sound like they go around beating people up, and it might make my kid think its ok to go beat people up"   <--- UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!11111!!!!1!!1!12345667899

Errrrr...................
THATS WHATS WRONG WITH AMERICA!!!
THEY DONT HAVE THIS PROBLEM IN TEXAS, ONE OF THE MANLIEST (AND REPUBLICAN!) STATES IN THE USA!!!

Last edited by Dezerteagal5 (2007-03-02 10:10:11)

15 more years! 15 more years!
topal63
. . .
+533|7146
^^^ LOL

Thanks for that...
Mitch
16 more years
+877|6953|South Florida

topal63 wrote:

^^^ LOL

Thanks for that...
Just trying to teach people whats going on. Its what im known for.
15 more years! 15 more years!
topal63
. . .
+533|7146

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

topal63 wrote:

^^^ LOL

Thanks for that...
Just trying to teach people whats going on. Its what im known for.
How old are you - just curious? You don't have to answer actually if you don't want to.

Last edited by topal63 (2007-03-02 10:16:57)

Elamdri
The New Johnnie Cochran
+134|7074|Peoria
Man, could you imagine it though, a society where people with STD's had to get like...I dunno a big red Plus sign tattooed on their chest or something?



...maybe I should write a book.
Mitch
16 more years
+877|6953|South Florida

topal63 wrote:

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

topal63 wrote:

^^^ LOL

Thanks for that...
Just trying to teach people whats going on. Its what im known for.
How old are you - just curious? You don't have to answer actually if you don't want to.
15
Age is nothing. I know more about politics then most sheep

Last edited by Dezerteagal5 (2007-03-02 10:24:33)

15 more years! 15 more years!
silo1180
The Farewell Tour
+79|6850|San Antonio, TX

Elamdri wrote:

Yknow, maybe its just the scientist in me, but I think it is a little overarching to say that there is no cure for a virus. For all we know, there may be and we just haven't discovered it yet.
I like to believe that someone is going to figure out how to kill a virus, but it just doesn't exist right now.  What I'm saying is, with the tools we have available at this moment, we can only treat the symptoms and not stop the disease.

Imagine what a break-through it will be when someone actually does figure out how to stop a virus!
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7164|Salt Lake City

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Elamdri wrote:

Yknow, maybe its just the scientist in me, but I think it is a little overarching to say that there is no cure for a virus. For all we know, there may be and we just haven't discovered it yet.

In the meantime, we have to examine the dilemma.

What is more important? The right of someone to keep their medical history private? Or the right of another human being to not be unwittingly infected by a deadly disease.

I personally feel that the second right is more important, and thus HIV bearers should be forced to disclose their disease to their partners before having sex. However, I don't know how you could do/enforce such a law without physically marking HIV+ individuals ala a "Scarlet Letter" type approach, but of course thats too Orwellian to be plausible.
Not really man, I agree. It's mindblowingly selfish for someone to not tell there partner there infected. I mean, if a chick did that to me i would kill her with a red hot knife.
But, of coarse, i don't think you could go around labeling people with AIDS. Treating them like cows getting numbers burned into them.
I wish the government would do something worthwhile for a change. Instead of banning 'nigger' in new york, maybe they can spend a little more time working on something that helps humanity.
I blame the liberals. The untallented money hungry commies who get elected, sit in there office, and make up stupid shit like "Banning the 'N' word" so they look like there helping the country.

More importantly, i blame religion severly for this, If the wack-job bible-slaved church goers werent spreading the word about how bad condoms are, and how its a sin to use a condom, then there would be a lot less trouble.

Oh!!! And dont get me started on schools!!!! Possibly THEE BEST place to teach young virgins about the risk of aids, but NO!!!! WE WOULDNT FUCKING WANT TO HAVE A LITTLE SEX ED.!!!! IT MIGHT FUCKING OFFEND SOMEONE!!!!!! That pisses me off more then you could fucking believe!!!!! Stupid-ass tree-hugging liberal, pussy, moms who complain to the schools because they dont want there kids learning about sex!! thus, the sex ed gets removed, thus kids go fucking away and get a kid at age 16...

People are so bent on 'not offending' that they dont realize they are PUSSYFYING there children!!! yes, pussyfying!! the act of turning one into a pussy!!

Here's a great example, here in liverpool new york, there was a kids basketball team, they were called the "Syracuse Bullies" with a bull in the background (l'pool is a suberb of syr) People complained that the bullies sounded like a mean name, and it might make kids go around beating people up!!!!! yes!!!!!! can you believe that bullshit!!!!!!!! This is an accurate quote from a mother they interviewed at the mall the other day
"Well, i think the bullies is a bad name, they sound like they go around beating people up, and it might make my kid think its ok to go beat people up"   <--- UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!11111!!!!1!!1!12345667899

Errrrr...................
THATS WHATS WRONG WITH AMERICA!!!
THEY DONT HAVE THIS PROBLEM IN TEXAS, ONE OF THE MANLIEST (AND REPUBLICAN!) STATES IN THE USA!!!
Hate to tell you this buddy, but this isn't a liberal problem.  Oh no, you can thank your Bible thumping, self rightous neo-cons for this one.  It's the conservatives that have always been against such education in schools.  Sorry to burst your own little neo-con bubble.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard