Where have you been; black racism is hip.
No kidding. He obviously hasn't seen a Dave Chappelle, Jamie Foxx, Richard Pryor, or a Paul Mooney stand-up show lately.ATG wrote:
Where have you been; black racism is hip.
LOLMG, dave chapel is the funniest stand up skit ive seen, Idk how he gets away with some of the stuffe he does
Didn't you know racism against whites is okay? Jeez...
How about affirmative action. That's universities telling black people and mexicans that they are inferior, so they get a handicap. But no one else seems to see it that way.
You won't have a world without racism until race is not considered on applications for anything. Until race simply doesn't matter, you will have judgment based on it.
You won't have a world without racism until race is not considered on applications for anything. Until race simply doesn't matter, you will have judgment based on it.
Dave Chappelle has some great racially based sketches in his TV shows and in his stand up. Chappelle takes the piss out of all races and has often taken the piss out of the gang banger culture as part of his comedy like the sketch about the great lost war of American History: the 1982 Chicago Gang Wars!Cougar wrote:
No kidding. He obviously hasn't seen a Dave Chappelle, Jamie Foxx, Richard Pryor, or a Paul Mooney stand-up show lately.
What I get from the article is the author is trying to link Inner city crime and gang mentality to the KKK in some way. He fails miserably. What the hell has gun culture, Rap music and American footballers got to do with the KKK?
Gangs, guns, rap music are all born out of the African American struggle to be accepted in a predominately white run society over the years. Gangs culture was born for the want of crime for profit. Board young kids with no prospects idolizing the local gangster with his money, flash car etc backed up by glorifying rappers is what drives kids to gangs.
The KKK was formed by the ruling white classes in the south. Through propaganda they recruited many impressionable young people and twisted them up. Their only reason was racism. The fear that African Americans who they viewed as closer to animals than white people would make their way up the class system.
The only link I can think of is that the KKK was a gang of sorts, but the two 'gangs' are like night and day.
Gangs, guns, rap music are all born out of the African American struggle to be accepted in a predominately white run society over the years. Gangs culture was born for the want of crime for profit. Board young kids with no prospects idolizing the local gangster with his money, flash car etc backed up by glorifying rappers is what drives kids to gangs.
The KKK was formed by the ruling white classes in the south. Through propaganda they recruited many impressionable young people and twisted them up. Their only reason was racism. The fear that African Americans who they viewed as closer to animals than white people would make their way up the class system.
The only link I can think of is that the KKK was a gang of sorts, but the two 'gangs' are like night and day.
The article in the OP is honestly just pure unadulterated bollocks.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
Actually -If anyone need to take a seat, I say it should have been the elder folk. Second, they left an unattended bag lying around the airport. Third, if the Airlines wanted people to wait like that they would issue paper "now serving" tags. Fourth, Her two sons can't stand? They were aged at 22 and 30. Fifth, This wasn't racism, it was a matter of policy. Lastly, who are you to say if the elder folk were or weren't intimidated? You weren't there. They elderly folk didn't even complain, the author of the article did.UON wrote:
The article in the OP is honestly just pure unadulterated bollocks.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
How would you feel if you had to stand in line for hours waiting while you watched people sleep, go get food and drink, use the bathroom then when it's time to go, watch them head to the front of the line cause "that's my bag"? It wasn't a question of race. It was about fairness. The people ejected from line turned it into a race issue. I'd be willing to be money that they've done it before and will do it again whenever they see that they can play the "race" card to help their situation (especially if they are in the wrong).
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Since when is 60's elderly? Pilots retire at 65 FFS. The two sons in their mid 20's / early 30's could not stand in line?UON wrote:
The article in the OP is honestly just pure unadulterated bollocks.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
you're an idiot. the GUY WHO WROTE THE ARTICLE WAS BLACK. FUCKING CHRIST!UON wrote:
The article in the OP is honestly just pure unadulterated bollocks.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
THE TWO CHILDREN WERE ADULTS!! (22 to 30) --TALKING ABOUT THEIR AGES!
now that i'm done being angry, i'll be rational.
its not acceptable. absolutely not. if they were younger children, maybe so. and i guarantee you that the 60 year old is the father/husband.
my grandfather is almsot 80 and he would have waited. in line. like the rest of us.
he never said they were lying. he knows they were telling the truth. it doesnt matter that they placed their bag there. its not an acceptable way of holding a place. either have one of the sons wait, or get in the back. thats the way the world functions for the rest of us.
it shouldn't be any different for others.
quit discriminating against white people, asshole.
yeah... sorry a bag isnt a placeholder in a line when you have people that are perfectly able to stand there and wait
So I guess the way to do it for the PS3 was to put a bag in front of Best Buy two weeks before the thing was released. Well why not?
Malloy must go
StupidUON wrote:
The article in the OP is honestly just pure unadulterated bollocks.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
Malloy must go
Yes i plan to join the United Caucasian College Fund....
Oh wait, that would be RACIST!!!!
But, any black kid could join the United Negro College Fund.. Yeah, i dare you to make a UCCF you'd be bitched at and called a racist and spit on and hated by the media.
Oh wait, that would be RACIST!!!!
But, any black kid could join the United Negro College Fund.. Yeah, i dare you to make a UCCF you'd be bitched at and called a racist and spit on and hated by the media.
15 more years! 15 more years!
Who? Please try and be less cryptic and explain why they are stupid.deeznutz1245 wrote:
StupidUON wrote:
The article in the OP is honestly just pure unadulterated bollocks.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
Ah man... Chappelle and Foxx are fine. It seemed like Chappelle was basically parodying Mooney whenever he appeared on his show.Cougar wrote:
No kidding. He obviously hasn't seen a Dave Chappelle, Jamie Foxx, Richard Pryor, or a Paul Mooney stand-up show lately.ATG wrote:
Where have you been; black racism is hip.
Jamie Foxx isn't a racist either, and he's a good actor.
Pryor and Mooney are the ones to blame.
Of course, Farrakhan is a total asshole who basically is a black David Duke.
You're preaching to the choir, man. I totally agree.iamangry wrote:
How about affirmative action. That's universities telling black people and mexicans that they are inferior, so they get a handicap. But no one else seems to see it that way.
You won't have a world without racism until race is not considered on applications for anything. Until race simply doesn't matter, you will have judgment based on it.
Not the person, the post. I think he did not readthe entire article because he referred to the "children" of the woman as if they were small and not in their 20's as described by the author.JahManRed wrote:
Who? Please try and be less cryptic and explain why they are stupid.deeznutz1245 wrote:
StupidUON wrote:
The article in the OP is honestly just pure unadulterated bollocks.
Just read the so called example he gives... it's unreasonable to expect a mother with two children and an elderly relative to wait in the queue, and since there was no-one in their group to hold their place using a bag is should be perfectly acceptable. It's obvious that these people were the victim of discrimination and intimidation, as he (despite being black) has instantly made the judgement that "this family are lying", and jumped in without prompting. The fact that he doesn't say he saw the family arrive proves that he couldn't have known if they were there first, and if they had indeed placed their bag there (which he never denies, and how the fuck would it be there otherwise?).
The guy who wrote the article is a racist against black people, and I don't care what colour his skin is. You can discriminate against anyone. The fact that he even tried to use that as an example just proves it to me.
Malloy must go
I cant wait for the day when everyone in the world has a tan complexion and racism will be gone forever.
contemporary racism will yield to either a fanatical sense of "shades" of said tan, or will yield itself to increased ethnic hatred and/or nationalism.The#1Spot wrote:
I cant wait for the day when everyone in the world has a tan complexion and racism will be gone forever.
Don´t spend your time waiting that will never happen.The#1Spot wrote:
I cant wait for the day when everyone in the world has a tan complexion and racism will be gone forever.
You would be loved by the media actually, whether they have nice things to say or not.... I don't know.Dezerteagal5 wrote:
Yes i plan to join the United Caucasian College Fund....
Oh wait, that would be RACIST!!!!
But, any black kid could join the United Negro College Fund.. Yeah, i dare you to make a UCCF you'd be bitched at and called a racist and spit on and hated by the media.
The other night at my friends bd party we had a little conversation about how the only racist people anymore are mostly not white but black. So because black people used to be slaves and called the n-word they still think all white people are still racist. I have black friends but they are level headed about things they joke about its because their black but don't mean it. It's worse when someone says it because I'm Mexican and they were born in America thus making them American