whats wrong? you need YOUR diaper changed??awww poor baby, now go in the corner and think about what you done before you get a spanking,lol, OWNED, now stfu and get a life idiot
Last edited by bootsy (2007-02-20 13:38:48)
Can we just ignore this prepubescent bed wetter and get back to disproving that the universe exists?
Neither is all of your well... They are not words so... I'll try to explain to you, but probably I can't do it due to your lack of intelligence.bootsy wrote:
and second of all, all my words are correct,what are you that stupid???
Example: "correct,what" that clearly isn't a word... You can't even use dots, or maybe your keyboard is fucked up?
EDIT: At above good idea.
Last edited by NooBesT[FiN] (2007-02-20 13:39:41)
Here are some things you need:bootsy wrote:
whats wrong? you need YOUR diaper changed??awww poor baby, now go in the corner and think about what you done before you get a spanking,lol, OWNED, now stfu and get a life idiot
1. A space bar.
2. Grammatical skills.
3. The ability to stop murdering English.
I nominate 'bootsy' to now be know as 'ruether'.
Last edited by Ganko_06 (2007-02-20 13:42:58)
I'll leave it at a single quote, incase anyone as stupid as you is reading. If they read any more of what you have to say, your stupidity would be so incomprehendable they won't understand. In fact, I can't really blame you for thinking you aren't stupid... your intelligence isn't high enough to understand how moronic you are. So yeah, nice one on the denial.bootsy wrote:
and second of all, all my words are correct,what are you that stupid???
Either he's gone, or he's crying too hard to type.
By universe you mean what exactly? The opposite of nothingness, void, not-energy, etc? What?Ganko_06 wrote:
Can we just ignore this prepubescent bed wetter and get back to disproving that the universe exists?
I would find it hard to prove the Universe exists - if you can't define exactly what it is you claim exists.
I think he meant, PI *is* infinite, that there is never a pattern, final resolution ... it never ends, it is therefore an irrational (transcendental) number - and the number of decimal places on the other side of 3. _ _ _ _ _ ---> is infinite.NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
No it's not, it's just a bit above 3soalfa wrote:
pi = infinite , prove this
And to Doomed, you shouldn't take this so seriously. DU even admitted that he can't prove everything wrong. This thread is just for fun to me at least.
Another decimal place of accuracy could be calculated for PI once every day and then added thereto; this could be done for an ETERNITY.
Transcendental number:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TranscendentalNumber.html
Last edited by topal63 (2007-02-20 13:46:42)
Okay then, we can get back to the subject at hand.
Hitler had a mustache and you have no way of disproving that one.
Hitler had a mustache and you have no way of disproving that one.
You made this thread thinking you could prove everything and anything wrong, when you read the first page you knew you had made a mistake...
You exist
George W. Bush is a bad leader
George W. Bush is a bad leader
Last edited by Tompie913 (2007-02-20 14:06:22)
It simply isn't true, the only evidence you have for the existence of the so-called "mustache" is photo-graphic in nature, and is probably doctored. Are you in possession of the actual "mustache"; if not then it does not exist; and there is no reason to think it ever did. If the evidence (photos) could have been doctored-up.Undetected_Killer wrote:
Okay then, we can get back to the subject at hand.
Hitler had a mustache and you have no way of disproving that one.
Agh, fine. I'll finally have to tell everyone my darkest secret..topal63 wrote:
It simply isn't true, the only evidence you have for the existence of the so-called "mustache" is photo-graphic in nature, and is probably doctored. Are you in possession of the actual "mustache"; if not then it does not exist; and there is no reason to think it ever did. If the evidence (photos) could have been doctored-up.Undetected_Killer wrote:
Okay then, we can get back to the subject at hand.
Hitler had a mustache and you have no way of disproving that one.
I own Hitler's mustache.
I keep it under my bed.
At night I sleep while holding the jar it is contained in.
In wisconsin right this very second. It is Feburary 20, 2007 and the time is 3:55:15 PM
Like many functions in math,Tompie913 wrote:
You exist
Your life; my life; is like a limit in calculus...
x = your or my life's length; a fixed finite value.
y = how long you or I am dead (eternity or infinity)
In function (x/y) as (y) approaches infinity the value of the function (x/y) approaches ZERO.
You thought therefore you are NOT. And you were so certain you were.
Last edited by topal63 (2007-02-20 14:21:15)
Produce the evidence then and post it here on this forum, but it can't be photo-graphic, as that could be faked or manufactured evidence.Undetected_Killer wrote:
Agh, fine. I'll finally have to tell everyone my darkest secret..topal63 wrote:
It simply isn't true, the only evidence you have for the existence of the so-called "mustache" is photo-graphic in nature, and is probably doctored. Are you in possession of the actual "mustache"; if not then it does not exist; and there is no reason to think it ever did. If the evidence (photos) could have been doctored-up.Undetected_Killer wrote:
Okay then, we can get back to the subject at hand.
Hitler had a mustache and you have no way of disproving that one.
I own Hitler's mustache.
I keep it under my bed.
At night I sleep while holding the jar it is contained in.
There isn't a God
Argh. You have disproved me.topal63 wrote:
Produce the evidence then and post it here on this forum, but it can't be photo-graphic, as that could be faked or manufactured evidence.Undetected_Killer wrote:
Agh, fine. I'll finally have to tell everyone my darkest secret..topal63 wrote:
It simply isn't true, the only evidence you have for the existence of the so-called "mustache" is photo-graphic in nature, and is probably doctored. Are you in possession of the actual "mustache"; if not then it does not exist; and there is no reason to think it ever did. If the evidence (photos) could have been doctored-up.
I own Hitler's mustache.
I keep it under my bed.
At night I sleep while holding the jar it is contained in.
How about this one:
Hitler did not have a mustache.
You have probably have not met Hitler when he was alive, and because his body was burned after his suicide, we can not be certain whether he did or didn'tUndetected_Killer wrote:
How about this one:
Hitler did not have a mustache.
Last edited by Tompie913 (2007-02-20 14:10:28)
Purgatory exists.Tompie913 wrote:
You have probably not met Hitler when he was alive, and because his body was burned after his suicide, we can not be certain whether he did or didn'tUndetected_Killer wrote:
How about this one:
Hitler did not have a mustache.
Are you asking ME to contradict myself?Undetected_Killer wrote:
Argh. You have disproved me.topal63 wrote:
Produce the evidence then and post it here on this forum, but it can't be photo-graphic, as that could be faked or manufactured evidence.Undetected_Killer wrote:
Agh, fine. I'll finally have to tell everyone my darkest secret..
I own Hitler's mustache.
I keep it under my bed.
At night I sleep while holding the jar it is contained in.
How about this one:
Hitler did not have a mustache.
OK(!) Everything I say / said is a lie. Makes perfect sense NO?
Since I have never met Hitler and CANNOT meet him... I see nothing exceptional about the claim he had a "mustache." Who told you otherwise? Fuck that guy(!) He is stupid... anyways, having a mustache is a quality of being that exists in human-beings. Even women possess this quality - facial hair - whether fine in aspect or not. Women have facial hair (fine or light; some more so than others even)... since a mustache can really be any hair upon your upper lip - and women can have them; as well as men - and they (mustaches) can really be of any size, thickness, color, length or shape... then and therefore Hitler must have had a "mustache."
Last edited by topal63 (2007-02-20 14:18:08)
Yuck - why must this be proved false?Tompie913 wrote:
... George W. Bush is a bad leader
Well, since it is a subjective determination, it is a qualifier of sorts: "bad"... he is "good" at being "bad!"
Therefore George W. Bush is a "good" leader - in the context that he is really "bad" at it.
What do you mean by God? Which one? What particular conception is being negated here?Brain_Soup wrote:
There isn't a God
Last edited by topal63 (2007-02-20 14:36:08)
What about this one:
I always lie.
I always lie.
You know, one of the more horrifying parts of this is that not only is it just the large masses that becoming farther apart (defying gravity therefore, since all masses attract rather than repel), but objects at a sub-atmoic level are becoming farther apart. Eventually, what this will mean is matter will be unable to exist in any form in the universe which would include life, despite how advanced any form of life will be. I should say all structures rather than all mater since dark matter isn't actually made out of atoms. But either way, this universe will eventually be a void without observers or structures (stars, planets, galaxies). This is all assuming that the universe will continue to accelerate in its growth rather than decelerate. If it doesn't, then there's the big crunch to worry about which will force this universe back into a singularity.Djbrown wrote:
Redshift shows that all galaxies/starts are moving away from us at an increasing rate. so the universe is apparently getting larger, faster every second.Apoc-SAS wrote:
has that even been proved right? if not, by default its as much wrong.Djbrown wrote:
Space is infinite
Again, this is assuming a lot of things.I read a book called 'the infinite book' which talks a lot about this stuff along with anything else having to do with infinity.
I reckon, if we're around to witness this "big crunch" billions of years from now, we'll be laughing at the speculation that it would harm us in any way.jet burned wrote:
You know, one of the more horrifying parts of this is that not only is it just the large masses that becoming farther apart (defying gravity therefore, since all masses attract rather than repel), but objects at a sub-atmoic level are becoming farther apart. Eventually, what this will mean is matter will be unable to exist in any form in the universe which would include life, despite how advanced any form of life will be. I should say all structures rather than all mater since dark matter isn't actually made out of atoms. But either way, this universe will eventually be a void without observers or structures (stars, planets, galaxies). This is all assuming that the universe will continue to accelerate in its growth rather than decelerate. If it doesn't, then there's the big crunch to worry about which will force this universe back into a singularity.Djbrown wrote:
Redshift shows that all galaxies/starts are moving away from us at an increasing rate. so the universe is apparently getting larger, faster every second.Apoc-SAS wrote:
has that even been proved right? if not, by default its as much wrong.
Again, this is assuming a lot of things.I read a book called 'the infinite book' which talks a lot about this stuff along with anything else having to do with infinity.