BF2S Forums Um, whats with news sources reporting military plans?

Yeah they've heard about secrecy, they just don't give a damn about it.  It seems that the media is more interested in selling a few more news papers than not giving away information that could endanger someone's life.

You mean like, Geraldo drawing a map in the dirt showing his position and plans while with U.S. troops in Iraq and then broadcasting it LIVE on TV?

Dumbass Geraldo.

Elamdri wrote:

I mean seriously, no offense, but why the hell are they allowed to report all this stuff? Hasn't anyone ever heard of a little thing called secrecy?

Like everyone is saying in this thread. The US has a plan to attack most places and the targets listed aren't exactly detailed or unexpected. Nuclear facilities, naval bases air bases, missile facilities command and control. Who'd have thought.

I know how to stop this: DONT TELL THE PRESS

FFS simple.

The NY times has leaked numerous plans/operatives in the past. Seems almost treasonous.


http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/09/miller … index.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2145810.stm

c0ldfyr3 wrote:

Secrecy is Guantonamo Bay, still think it's a good thing?

The press and the International Red Cross has been allowed to visit there.

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-02-20 14:06:50)