BF2S Forums Winnable tactics.

so if i say that maybe its time for wahabist islam to be outlawed, will i get flamed?

that isnt my intention, but that is what i feel would be a huge solution, not just for the US but the entire world.

ATG wrote:

To the Germans he was the very devil himself. Not loved, not a hero.

Those Germans were idiots.  They had no problem with exterminating millions of people.  Sorry, but IMO their "perspective" does not even come close to being credible.

CameronPoe wrote:

Parker wrote:

so if i say that maybe its time for wahabist islam to be outlawed, will i get flamed?

that isnt my intention, but that is what i feel would be a huge solution, not just for the US but the entire world.

It's impossible to outlaw a belief system. I mean - Germany today still has its fair share of neo-nazis. What would make it doubly difficult is that the Wahabi sect is the state religion of a country which supplies USA with copious amounts of oil and owns a large chunk of the US national debt...

i know it, and that drives me insane. i always think of the commercials they ran here after 9-11.....basically it brokedown to them hiring a PR firm in FUCKING NYC and sayinf "sorry, please keep buying our oil.".
if it were to happen, saudi arabia would be the place to start, from the top down. in fact if it were up to me, since it started there it would end there, drastically......to make a point.
but some guy that makes knives for a living has a very remote chance of helping to change the face of a religion.

ATG wrote:

Jeezuz in a prom dress don't your see that what you determine is creditable or not has zero impact on Taliban types?

Don't you see that is not my point?  My point is that someone of mcminty's intelligence should know better than to quote a saying like that since since he is not one of those types.

mcminty wrote:

Do I have to do it again?


First, while I'm deciding, there are some things I want to say:

1. What do you define a 'win'? Them embracing democracy in 5 years. To change their millennium old system of government at the drop of a hat? Get realistic.

2. The reported story was not a "they attacked the USA" story, it was a typical 'Mr.Shiite hates Mr.Sunni, so he kills Mr.Sunni." At the moment, some couldn't give a shit about America. All they want to do is kill their countrymen because of a minor difference in their version of Islam. It's called a civil war. America can't do shit to stop them.

3. By putting freedom fighter in quotation marks, were you trying to imply some sarcasm?. A freedom fighter and terrorist are the same thing. It is all about perspective. As the saying goes, "One man's terrorist is another mans freedom fighter."



I'll be back in an hour or two. We'll see then if it gets closed.

Mcminty.

So to be a freedom fighter what freedoms are the terrorists actually fighting for? The freedom to kill anyone they want whenever they want when their demands are not met ?? Yeah, not quite the freedom others in history have fought for.

I ask you what freedoms that are being denied them, other than the freedom to kill indiscriminately/

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:

mcminty wrote:

Do I have to do it again?


First, while I'm deciding, there are some things I want to say:

1. What do you define a 'win'? Them embracing democracy in 5 years. To change their millennium old system of government at the drop of a hat? Get realistic.

2. The reported story was not a "they attacked the USA" story, it was a typical 'Mr.Shiite hates Mr.Sunni, so he kills Mr.Sunni." At the moment, some couldn't give a shit about America. All they want to do is kill their countrymen because of a minor difference in their version of Islam. It's called a civil war. America can't do shit to stop them.

3. By putting freedom fighter in quotation marks, were you trying to imply some sarcasm?. A freedom fighter and terrorist are the same thing. It is all about perspective. As the saying goes, "One man's terrorist is another mans freedom fighter."



I'll be back in an hour or two. We'll see then if it gets closed.

Mcminty.

So to be a freedom fighter what freedoms are the terrorists actually fighting for? The freedom to kill anyone they want whenever they want when their demands are not met ?? Yeah, not quite the freedom others in history have fought for.

I ask you what freedoms that are being denied them, other than the freedom to kill indiscriminately/

In general, the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist is that a freedom fighter limits his destruction to government or military personnel.  A terrorist kills anyone and everyone.

It is true though that a lot of the terrorists just want us out of Iraq.  Others will keep killing until they are dead or their side has killed everyone else.

In other words, Iraq is a FUBAR situation that we need to leave.

So the question still stands.....If they are called freedom fighters by memebers of this forum, what freedoms arethey being denied or what freedoms are they fighting for?

lowing wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:

So to be a freedom fighter what freedoms are the terrorists actually fighting for? The freedom to kill anyone they want whenever they want when their demands are not met ?? Yeah, not quite the freedom others in history have fought for.

I ask you what freedoms that are being denied them, other than the freedom to kill indiscriminately/

In general, the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist is that a freedom fighter limits his destruction to government or military personnel.  A terrorist kills anyone and everyone.

It is true though that a lot of the terrorists just want us out of Iraq.  Others will keep killing until they are dead or their side has killed everyone else.

In other words, Iraq is a FUBAR situation that we need to leave.

So the question still stands.....If they are called freedom fighters by memebers of this forum, what freedoms arethey being denied or what freedoms are they fighting for?

It's all a matter of perception.  From our point of view they are killers and terrorists, bent on destroying everything.  From their perspective the country has been invaded, and the freedom they are fighting for is that to decide on how things should be run in their country.

If the Vatican put together an army to invade the US, remove our current form of government and replace it with Old Testament law, and put only Catholics in government positions, would you accept that?  From their standpint they are simply making a Christian society from the evil that they see.  Would you stand for that, or would you fight them to the end, including those within this country that you saw as supporting this move?