coughaardfrith wrote:
I'm sick to death of goddamned septics interfering in my country's business.
QFE.aardfrith wrote:
I'm sick to death of goddamned septics interfering in my country's business. Our intelligence services and police are doing their jobs and weeding out the radicals. The mainstream muslims are condemning the criminal elements. Everything's fine.
What's really pissing me off at the moment is that the youth of today is largely uncaring about people, property and proper behaviour. That's the white youth. All the asians and 2nd generation immigrants I see are well behaved. They care about education and good behaviour. White kids don't give a shit.
I don't see how our police catching 9 people before they could even carry out their plot has caused an increase in people telling us our country is out of control. It proves our intelligence agencies know their job and are doing it.
you should get that checked out. Take it easy.usmarine2007 wrote:
cough
QFTcrimson_grunt wrote:
QFE.aardfrith wrote:
I'm sick to death of goddamned septics interfering in my country's business. Our intelligence services and police are doing their jobs and weeding out the radicals. The mainstream muslims are condemning the criminal elements. Everything's fine.
What's really pissing me off at the moment is that the youth of today is largely uncaring about people, property and proper behaviour. That's the white youth. All the asians and 2nd generation immigrants I see are well behaved. They care about education and good behaviour. White kids don't give a shit.
I don't see how our police catching 9 people before they could even carry out their plot has caused an increase in people telling us our country is out of control. It proves our intelligence agencies know their job and are doing it.
Remember the July 28th attacks, the liquid explosive on a plane etc.
We tend to catch the terrorists before anything bad happens.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-02-01 15:44:57)
Maybe if the US doesn't want the rest of the world commenting they should stop invading it. Just a thought.usmarine2007 wrote:
coughaardfrith wrote:
I'm sick to death of goddamned septics interfering in my country's business.
UK is in Iraq also. KthxBubbalo wrote:
Maybe if the US doesn't want the rest of the world commenting they should stop invading it. Just a thought.usmarine2007 wrote:
coughaardfrith wrote:
I'm sick to death of goddamned septics interfering in my country's business.
Well done for noticing.usmarine2007 wrote:
UK is in Iraq also. KthxBubbalo wrote:
Maybe if the US doesn't want the rest of the world commenting they should stop invading it. Just a thought.usmarine2007 wrote:
cough
Did more than notice. Had a few beers with some.aardfrith wrote:
Well done for noticing.
But who led the charge? Besides which, when was the last time the UK created a terrorist organisation?usmarine2007 wrote:
UK is in Iraq also. KthxBubbalo wrote:
Maybe if the US doesn't want the rest of the world commenting they should stop invading it. Just a thought.usmarine2007 wrote:
cough
Last edited by Bubbalo (2007-02-01 15:59:46)
Whoever is in charge of sending British troops into combat.Bubbalo wrote:
But who led the charge?usmarine2007 wrote:
UK is in Iraq also. KthxBubbalo wrote:
Maybe if the US doesn't want the rest of the world commenting they should stop invading it. Just a thought.
we are an alliance not a fkn dictatorship. if our prime minister didnt want to back the U.S he wouldnt send us. ffs why dont we stop slating each other and agree that its the UK and U.S that will only really stand up to the fuckheads of this world.
Last edited by [=][=]DADDYOFDEATH (2007-02-01 16:05:34)
You clearly don't understand the term "lead the charge".usmarine2007 wrote:
Whoever is in charge of sending British troops into combat.Bubbalo wrote:
But who led the charge?usmarine2007 wrote:
UK is in Iraq also. Kthx
Either way. This:
Was added shortly after (my apologies for poor timing). Care to comment?Bubbalo wrote:
Besides which, when was the last time the UK created a terrorist organisation?
I did understand the term...but it was a stupid term IMO. The US did not force anyone to go. Plain and simple. As for the UK terrorist comment, I have no idea what you are getting at.Bubbalo wrote:
You clearly don't understand the term "lead the charge".usmarine2007 wrote:
Whoever is in charge of sending British troops into combat.Bubbalo wrote:
But who led the charge?
Either way. This:Was added shortly after (my apologies for poor timing). Care to comment?Bubbalo wrote:
Besides which, when was the last time the UK created a terrorist organisation?
And that comment just shows that you really don't understand the term.usmarine2007 wrote:
I did understand the term...but it was a stupid term IMO. The US did not force anyone to go. Plain and simple.
Who created Al Qaeda?usmarine2007 wrote:
As for the UK terrorist comment, I have no idea what you are getting at.
I dunno, when was the IRA formed??Bubbalo wrote:
You clearly don't understand the term "lead the charge".usmarine2007 wrote:
Whoever is in charge of sending British troops into combat.Bubbalo wrote:
But who led the charge?
Either way. This:Was added shortly after (my apologies for poor timing). Care to comment?Bubbalo wrote:
Besides which, when was the last time the UK created a terrorist organisation?
For once I agree with you, if you're actually saying that the UK is also guilty of creating terrorist organisation, and not just America. Hell, Britain was pretty much the major playerprotagonist in many of the Zionist terror movements in the infancy of what became modern Israel.lowing wrote:
I dunno, when was the IRA formed??Bubbalo wrote:
You clearly don't understand the term "lead the charge".usmarine2007 wrote:
Whoever is in charge of sending British troops into combat.
Either way. This:Was added shortly after (my apologies for poor timing). Care to comment?Bubbalo wrote:
Besides which, when was the last time the UK created a terrorist organisation?
Last edited by UON (2007-02-01 16:52:56)
Actually I was going for the Irish Republican Army starring Michael CollinsUON wrote:
For once I agree with you, if you're actually saying that the UK is also guilty of creating terrorist organisation, and not just America. Hell, Britain was pretty much the major playerprotagonist in many of the Zionist terror movements in the infancy of what became modern Israel.lowing wrote:
I dunno, when was the IRA formed??Bubbalo wrote:
You clearly don't understand the term "lead the charge".usmarine2007 wrote:
Whoever is in charge of sending British troops into combat.
Either way. This:
Was added shortly after (my apologies for poor timing). Care to comment?
That's Irish, and was formed to attack Britain.lowing wrote:
I dunno, when was the IRA formed??
Which also attacked the British in order to push them out. The British didn't help them form, they just didn't help stop them.UON wrote:
Hell, Britain was pretty much the major playerprotagonist in many of the Zionist terror movements in the infancy of what became modern Israel.
Terrorists create terrorist organizations you chuckleheads. England didnt create the IRA, and the US didnt create Al Qaida. Hold people accountible for thier own actions.
So the US didn't fund or organise Al Qaeda in Afghanistan against the Russians?
You know that squishy grey mass in your head? Have you ever tried using it?
You know that squishy grey mass in your head? Have you ever tried using it?
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. Unnecessarily impinging freedom for personal gain could easily be considered to also be considered as creating terrorism, albeit with a slight level of indirection. But yeah, America has got more directly involved more than Britain ever did.Bubbalo wrote:
So the US didn't fund or organise Al Qaeda in Afghanistan against the Russians?
You know that squishy grey mass in your head? Have you ever tried using it?
Last edited by UON (2007-02-01 17:17:03)
I am so sick of that phrase. Those terms are not mutually exclusive.UON wrote:
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.
rofl...And you can thank a democrat for that.Bubbalo wrote:
So the US didn't fund or organise Al Qaeda in Afghanistan against the Russians?
You know that squishy grey mass in your head? Have you ever tried using it?
Besides, at the time, the Russians were perceived to be a big threat. But, since you want to use history as a judge, why not lay off Iraq and let history decide?
Why dont you simply try reading? There is a difference between creating and funding, and Al Qaida was a much different organization in the early 80's.Bubbalo wrote:
So the US didn't fund or organise Al Qaeda in Afghanistan against the Russians?
You know that squishy grey mass in your head? Have you ever tried using it?
Oh well then Al Queda is Muslim, and has nothing to do with the USABubbalo wrote:
That's Irish, and was formed to attack Britain.lowing wrote:
I dunno, when was the IRA formed??Which also attacked the British in order to push them out. The British didn't help them form, they just didn't help stop them.UON wrote:
Hell, Britain was pretty much the major playerprotagonist in many of the Zionist terror movements in the infancy of what became modern Israel.
Bubbalo your getting assaulted from all sides. . . lol
See Ronald Reagan quote in sig if that helps you!!!
See Ronald Reagan quote in sig if that helps you!!!