BF2S Forums Saudi Arabia

usmarine2007 wrote:

Cause of like....oil and stuff.

UGADawgs wrote:

Get back to us when ethanol takes over as the fuel of choice.

CameronPoe wrote:

UGADawgs wrote:

Get back to us when ethanol takes over as the fuel of choice.

Gotta love it when an American says it openly like that.

DesertFox423 wrote:

Isn't this a double standard? The country is criticized for invading Iraq, which was a dictatorship, and the site of more than a few, to put it gently, human rights violations. However now, you can chastise the country for not toppling more autocracies in the world?

This isn't supposed to be any sort of personal attack, just a poorly expressed thought.

ATG wrote:

Other,
we're gonna let the Sunnis and Shia bleed each other for a while. Softening them up for a mop up operation.

At which point, I , as freely elected dictator, will outlaw religion forever.

kilgoretrout wrote:

Also, Saudi Arabia owns a shitload of our national debt, don't they?  I'm fairly certain that I've read both China and Saudi Arabia own enough of our national debt that if they demanded payment on what we owe them, it would completely crash our economy.  But, I'm too lazy to look that up.  Anyone else read something similar?

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who claims to abhor bin Laden, seems nevertheless eager to follow his agenda. In an interview with Arab News in May 2002, the prince said that if the Arabs "unite through economic interests," they would achieve influence over the U.S. decision-makers. Since government sources estimate Saudi holdings in the United States at $400 billion to $800 billion, the matter warrants public attention.
    The Saudi agenda extends far beyond policy-makers. In the late 1990s, the privately owned Massachusetts technology company, Ptech, designed software used to develop enterprise blueprints that held every important detail of a given concern. The company was financed with more than $22 million, by Saudi multi-millionaire Yasin al Qadi, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. The Saudis thus gained access to strategic information about many major U.S. corporations such as SYSCO, ENRON, and the U.S. Departments of Defense, Treasury, Justice, Energy, and even the White House. The extent of the damage, if it was investigated, remains a mystery.
    Meanwhile, substantial Saudi and Gulf financial contributions "to bring the proper message to America's brightest minds," are pouring into U.S. educational institutions through Arab and Islamic centers and professorial chairs. Last month the prince gave $20 million each to Georgetown and Harvard universities. According to the Center for Religious Freedom, the Saudis also supply textbooks for public libraries, schools and colleges, and provide the content concerning Islam to some U.S. textbook publishers.
    The Saudis' potential influence on U.S. and international media was recently illustrated by the prince's purchase of 5.6 percent of voting shares in News Corp., the world's largest publisher of English newspapers. Moreover, Reuters reported on Dec. 5 that the prince announced his plan to "spread the right message" via a new television channel, "The Message," to broadcast to the U.S. within two years.
    Yet, information regarding the magnitude of the Saudi economic infiltration into the United States is secret. The U.S. Treasury's interpretation of the census law, supported by a 1982 court decision, shields this data from the public. On Oct. 27, 1982, the American Jewish Congress (AJC) was denied information requested under its own FOIA inquiry, by the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C. (Civ. A. No. 81-1745). The AJC litigated its FOIA case up to the Supreme Court, but the government won.
    Indeed, filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Department of Commerce is useless. FOIA Director Burton H. Reist stated in December that this data "is protected by Title 13, United States Code, Section 9, which requires that census records be used solely for statistical purposes and also makes these records confidential." Furthermore, FOIA "exempts from disclosure records that are made confidential by statute." In other words, the government wants this information kept secret.
     Under the "International Investment & Trade in Services Survey Act," the U.S. Treasury Department tracks foreign portfolio, and Commerce tracks direct investments. This information is unavailable for Saudi Arabia or the Gulf States, following their request that the details be suppressed "to avoid disclosure of data of individual companies." For example, under the heading "Foreign holdings of U.S. long-term securities, by country," Treasury aggregates all eight "Middle East oil exporters." A Treasury Department official said that this aggregation is a "Treasury policy," and justifies the non-disclosure on grounds that this information could "harm national security and foreign relations."

Last edited by Spark (2007-01-16 22:59:51)