Poll

Republican or Democrat, and why?

Democrat, because you agree with them.15%15% - 9
Democrat, because they aren't republican.17%17% - 10
Republican, because you agree with them.28%28% - 16
Republican, because they aren't democrats.15%15% - 9
Third Party, because you agree with them.7%7% - 4
Third Party, because they aren't Democrat or Republican15%15% - 9
Total: 57
ts-pulsar
Member
+54|6930
I got into a discussion with some friends last night over politics.  One of my friends said "He only votes republican because he can't stand democrats" and it got me thinking, how much of our political views are because of opposition.

I know my self, I tend to side with republicans because I can't stand democrats.  I really can't stand republicans either, but I see them as the lesser of two evils.  I usually vote for a third party when it's obvious that a democrat or a republican is going to win in a landslide, but I'll usually vote republican if it's a close election, simply because I just don't want democrats in power.

How bout you?
Volatile
Member
+252|7131|Sextupling in Empire

That's pretty much how I am.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6982
Well in Ireland I vote for whoever, tactically speaking, will mean that Fine Gael DO NOT get into power. We have multi-party proportional representation over here though, it's not two-party first past the post, so there is more 'skill' involved in voting.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-10 13:14:52)

Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7270|Reykjavík, Iceland.
I can't vote yep, but when I turn 18 I will vote for the socialists.

Because they don't want all these aluminum factories that the independent party wants.
King_Vegeta
Member
+4|7056
I vote Republican because I agree with them. However, I may not always agree on how they handle things and go about doing them, but I support their ideals and way of thinking.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7076

CameronPoe wrote:

Well in Ireland I vote for whoever, tactically speaking, will mean that Fine Gael DO NOT get into power. We have multi-party proportional representation over here though, it's not two-party first past the post, so there is more 'skill' involved in voting.
Who are Fine Gael? Some kind of extremist party?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6982

ghettoperson wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Well in Ireland I vote for whoever, tactically speaking, will mean that Fine Gael DO NOT get into power. We have multi-party proportional representation over here though, it's not two-party first past the post, so there is more 'skill' involved in voting.
Who are Fine Gael? Some kind of extremist party?
No. There are two main parties: Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. Then there are the Labour, Green, Progressive Democrat parties and Sinn Féin. Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are both centre-right parties, but their origins and general manifestos are different in certain regards. Fine Gael are more 'rich farmers' and condescending 'D4' big money types - the party is founded by those that signed the agreement giving up the six counties of Northern Ireland in exchange for independence. Fianna Fáil is founded by those that vehemently disagreed with that agreement, out of which spawned the Irish civil war. Fianna Fáil are the party responsible for breaking all links wiith the UK in 1949, withdrawing from the commonwealth and all that, i.e. copper-fastening our independence. They are a far stronger party when it comes to the Northern Ireland issue. Unlike Fine Gael, whose ex-leader announced 'This is the greatest day of my life' upon the first visit of a British royal (Prince Charles) to the Republic since its foundation - what about his wedding, or perhaps the birth of his children!?? Really both parties have similar economic policies but Fianna Fáil is the moderate republican party when it comes to Northern Ireland (Sinn Féin being the more extreme party and Fine Gael being the people who sold our brethren north of the border out).

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-10 13:57:37)

unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7199|PNW

Where's the option for "I don't side with parties, and vote for candidates instead..."
Snipedya14
Dont tread on me
+77|7122|Mountains of West Virginia

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Where's the option for "I don't side with parties, and vote for candidates instead..."
Ditto.
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7270|Reykjavík, Iceland.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Where's the option for "I don't side with parties, and vote for candidates instead..."
That wouldn't work on Iceland, it's all about who has the most seats on congress, our president has no power whatsoever, it's all about making bills and getting them through congress.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina
Libertarians FTW
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6918|Menlo Park, CA
GOP!!

Cause' I come from a self made, hard working, educated, military family!
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7199|PNW

Turquoise wrote:

Libertarians FTW
Their platform is more scattered than the Republicans' and the Democrats'. Unfortunately, the most you're going to get by voting for them is giving left-leaning parties more of a chance.
djphetal
Go Ducks.
+346|6763|Oregon
I support democrats because they are the more liberal of the two major parties. I would still much prefer a secular party, because a government should be separate from religion, but that won't happen. Democrats bother me, but republicans bother me more, and since you're wasting your time backing 3rd parties, I'm a Dem and proud of it... kinda.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Libertarians FTW
Their platform is more scattered than the Republicans' and the Democrats'. Unfortunately, the most you're going to get by voting for them is giving left-leaning parties more of a chance.
...or giving the Republicans a reason to become more liberal on social policies.  I'll be honest...  there are only two reasons why I'm not Republican: the Religious Right and the warmongers.

If Republicans were less uptight on social issues and less hawkish about war, then I'd gladly support their economic positions.

EDIT: As it currently stands, Ron Paul is the only Republican I can say that I truly support on a consistent basis.  I disagree with him on many social issues, but we agree on almost everything else.

Last edited by Turquoise (2007-01-10 17:14:52)

Home
Section.80
+447|7275|Seattle, Washington, USA

A little bit of both option 1 and 2.
ts-pulsar
Member
+54|6930

Turquoise wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Libertarians FTW
Their platform is more scattered than the Republicans' and the Democrats'. Unfortunately, the most you're going to get by voting for them is giving left-leaning parties more of a chance.
...or giving the Republicans a reason to become more liberal on social policies.  I'll be honest...  there are only two reasons why I'm not Republican: the Religious Right and the warmongers.

If Republicans were less uptight on social issues and less hawkish about war, then I'd gladly support their economic positions.

EDIT: As it currently stands, Ron Paul is the only Republican I can say that I truly support on a consistent basis.  I disagree with him on many social issues, but we agree on almost everything else.
+1  That's the whole reason I try to avoid voting republican if I can, can't stand the religious and war mongering policies.

Democrats I will never vote for because I disagree with just about everything that democrats seem to side with.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7199|PNW

I agree that R/D choices are a bit like Tweedledee vs Tweedledum, but how many people here have voted libertarian and seen their candidate win, and for what office?

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-01-10 20:13:47)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I agree that R/D choices are a bit like Tweedledee vs Tweedledum, but how many people here have voted libertarian and seen their candidate win, and for what office?
I can't deny that you are right when it comes to how Libertarians don't normally win.

However, every party has to start somewhere.  There was a time when the Republicans were just a small party.

Over time, parties evolve.  An important thing to note in the 2006 Midterm Elections is that Libertarians grabbed a larger percentage than ever in several Senatorial and House races.  Some of them could arguably be blamed for the Democratic victories in certain races.  Since I currently view the Democrats as the lesser of two evils, I'm willing to help that occur if it simultaneously aids the party I really favor (Libertarians).

Besides, this "spoiler" argument against 3rd parties is only the result of both parties resisting the implementation of instant runoff voting.  If this was set into place, people could vote for multiple candidates in order of preference.  Click here to find out more: http://www.instantrunoff.com/
link52787
Member
+29|6949
Its kinda hard for me to choose a political party.  One thing I am an atheist.  Some issues don't apply to me and most people of America are Christians.  Second, well,  I'm kind of in the middle but I lean toward to the the liberals, I'm not a conservative.  I'm a minority, I don't know if that really affects me.  Though I am a registered democrat but I am going to change to independent.  Also I have a limited understanding of the political system, and I understand the platform between the parties.  I'm still finding my place in the system I guess.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6895

Homeschtar wrote:

A little bit of both option 1 and 2.
ts-pulsar
Member
+54|6930

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I agree that R/D choices are a bit like Tweedledee vs Tweedledum, but how many people here have voted libertarian and seen their candidate win, and for what office?
I actually have voted libertarian and seen my candidate win.  But it was just for a seat on the board of supervisors in my home town, not exactly a huge win, but it happens.
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|6997|Portland, OR, USA
Atm I'm independent.  But I tend to side with the dems. on most issues...
13rin
Member
+977|6906

CameronPoe wrote:

Well in Ireland I vote for whoever, tactically speaking, will mean that Fine Gael DO NOT get into power. We have multi-party proportional representation over here though, it's not two-party first past the post, so there is more 'skill' involved in voting.
Skill in voting? Is there an obsticle course blocking you path to the booth?  Or is voting like the game "duck hunt" -where the guy you want to vote for box moves around on the screen and you have to catch it?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
mcgid1
Meh...
+129|7144|Austin, TX/San Antonio, TX

DBBrinson1 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Well in Ireland I vote for whoever, tactically speaking, will mean that Fine Gael DO NOT get into power. We have multi-party proportional representation over here though, it's not two-party first past the post, so there is more 'skill' involved in voting.
Skill in voting? Is there an obsticle course blocking you path to the booth?  Or is voting like the game "duck hunt" -where the guy you want to vote for box moves around on the screen and you have to catch it?
First of all haha at that.

Second: My views are a lot of 3 and a whole lot of 4.  I may not agree with how the Republicans go about things, but I do agree with most of their views.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard