Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-06 16:55:53)
Last edited by [F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi (2007-01-06 19:12:52)
Last edited by arabeater (2007-01-06 17:04:50)
Really?The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week
Not to mention the fact that Israel is tiny and could be entirely carpet missiled in no time. The Iranians could just as well rain down 200 missiles on Dimona and destroy Israel with the resultant nuclear pollution.herrr_smity wrote:
if they in their wisdom decide do attack Iran then they will unleash a world of shit and it will all hit Israel.
Iran has both the will and means to hit back
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-06 17:16:05)
I doubt Russia would be too happy seeing Iran nuked as well. But, the US would probably retaliate for any attack on Israel, and then the world would go boom.CameronPoe wrote:
Not to mention the fact that Israel is tiny and could be entirely carpet missiled in no time. The Iranians could just as well rain down 200 missiles on Dimona and destroy Israel with the resultant nuclear pollution.herrr_smity wrote:
if they in their wisdom decide do attack Iran then they will unleash a world of shit and it will all hit Israel.
Iran has both the will and means to hit back
Ah, depleted uranium...sounds familiar.Vilham wrote:
For a start this is clearly misleading. What the missles most like are is tiped with radioactive material, this gives increased penitration as they are "bunker Busting" bombs, the type other countries has used thousands of times before.
well, for one thing, those EMP blasts go pretty damn far. Also, you don't need a tactical nuke to generate an EMP. I'd also worry about the consequences of detonating a nuke in the atmosphere with radiation.Parker wrote:
hell why dont they just detonate a nuke in the atmosphere and do the old EMP back to the stone age deal.......then nuclear reactors wont be an issue.
Exactly.Kmarion wrote:
Boy, this topic title is misleading. Drawing up plans and using Nukes are very different. Both the United States and Russia have had plans to Destroy each for quite sometime now.
that is correct, but they are extremely low yeild explosives, and will be detonated probably 30 feet underground. It will not cause that much fallout, in the direction of the wind, people as far as perhaps 100 miles might be effected, but only people within i think 30 miles or so of ground zero (downwind) will die. If that much. I can't remember exactly from the diagram, but the area affected is very small, and not very significant. If there is a city right next to the explosion it will experience effects, but like i said the radiation is mostly spread downwind and there isn't very much radiation anyway.herrr_smity wrote:
http://www.fas.org/faspir/2001/v54n1/weapons.htm
Carpet Missiled !?!?!?!?!? LOL !! Carpet bombed.......... Anyhow have you heard of these things called fallout shelters? Well they are for the nukes but every single home in Israel has a bombing raid shelter under the house.CameronPoe wrote:
Not to mention the fact that Israel is tiny and could be entirely carpet missiled in no time. The Iranians could just as well rain down 200 missiles on Dimona and destroy Israel with the resultant nuclear pollution.herrr_smity wrote:
if they in their wisdom decide do attack Iran then they will unleash a world of shit and it will all hit Israel.
Iran has both the will and means to hit back
Last edited by jonnykill (2007-01-06 18:09:48)