The Shiite kids need a statue's face to spray paint dicks on. Perfect.
Malloy must go
I heard about that.
USA turned Saddam from a villain into a martyr... Civil war in Iraq is now a fact. Congrats, mr. Bush! I guess that's your idea of "freedom" lol
0wn3d!1
USA turned Saddam from a villain into a martyr... Civil war in Iraq is now a fact. Congrats, mr. Bush! I guess that's your idea of "freedom" lol
0wn3d!1
>>>BF3 Central<<<
Gaddafi = Loon.BBC wrote:
Libya declared three days of mourning after Saddam Hussein's death and cancelled public celebrations around the Eid religious holiday.
They gave up their nuclear program, it's all good.
Why build another one?? They can have that big one that was brought down in Iraq a few years ago. Iraq isn't using it now.CameronPoe wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6232859.stm
Martyrdom has arrived in the form of a statue!
I am waiting for statues of Camronpoe to start popping up in Iran, Cuba, Syria, NK etc......or maybe his own talk show on AL Jeezera TV?
Last edited by lowing (2007-01-06 05:09:29)
They never had any nuclear guns to begin with. If they had, Bush would never invade Iraq, the main reason was oil(money). Bush should start war against North Korea or Iran or Pakistan if the reason was to stop nuclear programs..ATG wrote:
They gave up their nuclear program, it's all good.
I believe he's talking about Libya.snuten_i_sjoholmen wrote:
They never had any nuclear guns to begin with. If they had, Bush would never invade Iraq, the main reason was oil(money). Bush should start war against North Korea or Iran or Pakistan if the reason was to stop nuclear programs..ATG wrote:
They gave up their nuclear program, it's all good.
Maybe, but that was not the reason for going to Iraq.............read a bit and stop watching YOU TUBE videos.snuten_i_sjoholmen wrote:
They never had any nuclear guns to begin with. If they had, Bush would never invade Iraq, the main reason was oil(money). Bush should start war against North Korea or Iran or Pakistan if the reason was to stop nuclear programs..ATG wrote:
They gave up their nuclear program, it's all good.
So what was the real reason? Enlighten us please.lowing wrote:
Maybe, but that was not the reason for going to Iraq.............read a bit and stop watching YOU TUBE videos.snuten_i_sjoholmen wrote:
They never had any nuclear guns to begin with. If they had, Bush would never invade Iraq, the main reason was oil(money). Bush should start war against North Korea or Iran or Pakistan if the reason was to stop nuclear programs..ATG wrote:
They gave up their nuclear program, it's all good.
The real reason was we were tired of enforcing the U.N. mandated no fly zone and, after 9-11 we felt the need to let the muslim world know that we can go into any country on the planet and fuck shit up and there isn't a whole lot, short of nukes, that you can do to stop us.
In short, it was a bitch slap to the governments that sponcer and support terrorism, and for that reason, I still support the war.
Bush, on the other hand, is a national embarrassment and has little to do with how I feel about the war.
In short, it was a bitch slap to the governments that sponcer and support terrorism, and for that reason, I still support the war.
Bush, on the other hand, is a national embarrassment and has little to do with how I feel about the war.
Wait wait stop right there...."Bush, on the other hand, is a national embarrassment and has little to do with how I feel about the war" so then the stated reason is not what was given to us by the government, essentially its what you have decided. Sadly, the UN no fly zone is bull, because for the most part none of the issues had to do with a fly zone enforcement. I highly doubt this could be a convincing enough reason to invade a country.ATG wrote:
The real reason was we were tired of enforcing the U.N. mandated no fly zone and, after 9-11 we felt the need to let the muslim world know that we can go into any country on the planet and fuck shit up and there isn't a whole lot, short of nukes, that you can do to stop us.
In short, it was a bitch slap to the governments that sponcer and support terrorism, and for that reason, I still support the war.
Bush, on the other hand, is a national embarrassment and has little to do with how I feel about the war.
Governments that sponsor terrorism you don't have to go far to find these, you have them right here in the good old US of A. Not only have you failed to mention the fact that the UN no fly zones are placed via the UN, but the fact that the UN itself did not sanction the actions in IRAQ...see here is the problem you can't use the UN as a legitimizing reason, in this case the no fly zone, but then fail to state the fact that the organization ITSELF denounced our UNILATERAL action. Do you see the problem here?
The latter half of your response was more fitting, the US wanted to smack around the "muslim world," if i exchange the term Muslim and infuse it with a hint of Jew and replace neocon with Nazi what does that spell?
Name any connections Iraq had to those that commited 911
Rationalize for me why we did not attack Saudi Arabia or Egpty, IE the home of fundemetal schools of Islam?
We set the puppet up to fall back in 84' he served his purpose in '06.
so it is ok for the US to fund terrorists?ATG wrote:
The real reason was we were tired of enforcing the U.N. mandated no fly zone and, after 9-11 we felt the need to let the muslim world know that we can go into any country on the planet and fuck shit up and there isn't a whole lot, short of nukes, that you can do to stop us.
In short, it was a bitch slap to the governments that sponcer and support terrorism, and for that reason, I still support the war.
Bush, on the other hand, is a national embarrassment and has little to do with how I feel about the war.
I'm thinking of Ireland here folks
True We should not have made such a fuss out of the whole independance thing and started it all, but then again i'm not sure anything justifies people blowing up other people who arn't involved and most likely don't care, and it is just as bad to support them
...because America killed Saddam.Nikola Bathory wrote:
I heard about that.
USA turned Saddam from a villain into a martyr... Civil war in Iraq is now a fact. Congrats, mr. Bush! I guess that's your idea of "freedom" lol
0wn3d!1
why making a problem of that ? in a few years no one will remember who is represented by the statue or who is saddam. it will have the same use as all the statues in the parks near me.... landing / shitting pad for all kind of birds.
Who cares? Libya's flag is completely green for fuck's sake:
I shit you not, that's their flag at a 1:2 ratio. They SAY it's cause Green is the color of Islam, but I think they're just lazy.
I shit you not, that's their flag at a 1:2 ratio. They SAY it's cause Green is the color of Islam, but I think they're just lazy.
lol...
solid green flag, and their national coat of arms or whatever is green as well, with an eagle or hawk on it (not sure which)
thts funny though
solid green flag, and their national coat of arms or whatever is green as well, with an eagle or hawk on it (not sure which)
thts funny though
and so the people of iraq will make a pilgrimage to hit that statue with shoes? cool
Exactly... lollowing wrote:
I am waiting for statues of Camronpoe to start popping up in Iran, Cuba, Syria, NK etc......or maybe his own talk show on AL Jeezera TV?
Love is the answer