B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7132|Cologne, Germany

ATG wrote:

VagrantSoldier wrote:

btw, how was that execution grotesque.  You seem to be able to tolerate death, but you can't watch someone you probably despised die?  What the hell do you think executions are for?  They are not punishment, it is a form of payment to the people the guilty has hurt.
It was a mob spectacle. I generally don't like state run  killings but sometimes it is clearly justified, as with Saddam.
But,
1) if you are okay with the spectacle that was Saddams death I submit you at heart, may be as cruel and viscious as the terrorist.
2) Government run executions should be as emotionless and clinical as possible.
3) We lead by example, and turning a former head of state over to a mob is a piss poor example.

Vagrant, your obviously new here, and so I understand your hackles getting raised over this thread; just gotta understand I am trying to make a larger point, and to see how many people read the OP before posting. Every person who posted something to do with auto accidents did not read the OP and are hereby busted.

Part of the larger point is that you don't go into a foreign land, kill their people, prison their leaders and expect anything other than a fight. And if you are going to put my fellow countrymen in that kind of meat grinder you better damn sure have thought it all through and fight to win.

To do anything less is to encourage voting in America from the roof tops and with explosives.

VagrantSoldier wrote:

You can not call me ignorant for not examining the damage control argument.  That is the only argument anyone ever puts up for staying in Iraq.  I should not have to try, you should know.  You are the ignorant ones and I don't care if you don't believe me.  I know I am right and I know I will lose this argument, but "force can oppress the truth" F. Scott Fritzgerald or some other smart person.
We are going to stay in Iraq and expand operations elsewhere because these people cannot be trusted with WMD's. It's not about damage control, it's about inflicting enough damage on them for us to maintain military supremecy.
for once, Iraq had no WMD's when you went to war with them, and even if they did previously, it was probably because the US ( among others ) supplied them when the Iraq was still an ally against Iran. Funny how history turns out sometimes...

Also, the concept of military supremacy looks a bit out-dated in this day and age, wouldn't you agree ?
At least the insurgents are not buying it. You had military supremacy over Iraq well before the war started, there was no doubt about that. You crushed Iraq's regular army within days.
But since then, the war in Iraq has turned into a stalemate at best. You are exchanging body bags for little to no considerable progress. Damage control ? euphemisms ftw..

I wonder for how long the american public will stand and watch more and more of their sons and daughters walk into this meatgrinder some call a "success"...
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6820|Global Command
I'm not calling it a success. Thats why radical action is required.
The concept of military supremacy looks a bit out-dated in this day and age?    Not to me .
B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7132|Cologne, Germany

ATG wrote:

I'm not calling it a success. Thats why radical action is required.
The concept of military supremacy looks a bit out-dated in this day and age?    Not to me .
well, I didn't say you did, did I ?

That was just a general remark to finish my thought.

Military supremacy is a concept derived from times when nations battled each other in well-regulated armed conflicts, using regular standing armies, flags, uniforms, etc. The losers would raise the white flag, surrender, and that was the end of that.

Ultimately, it turned into an global arms race and ended in the cold war, and MAD. But the cold war is long over, and military supremacy has its limitations. Regular armies are generally ineffective against well-organized insurgents or terrorists, who hide among the general population. Vietnam was a first look at that, and it seems we see the same thing happening again in Iraq.
Regular armies have SOP, ROE, etc. The insurgents don't. Regular armies these days must try to protect the civilian population, while the terrorists don't give a damn.
The army is a broadsword, not a scalpell. Essentially, you are asking the Marines to do Counter-Terrorism work in Iraq, and we both know that it won't work out on the long run.

Military supremacy worked well in conflicts between nations. These days though, the enemy doesn't wear uniforms, doesn't fly flags and usually doesn't fight from a fixed territory.

Also, where does this concept lead you strategically ? do you actually think you'll produce less enemies if you continue to invade other nations ?

I'd say it's not only radical action that is required, but also a radical shift in strategy. After all, I think we both agree that later US foreign policy hasn't been much of a success, has it ?
EVieira
Member
+105|6769|Lutenblaag, Molvania

ATG wrote:

We let them chant Muqtadas name and insult the condemed as he stood on the gallows.
What.
Are.
We.
Doing.
Is that what they were saying? Humm, not good at all. If only the US had a minimal respect for international courts, he could have been hauled to Europe for a trial...
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6846

ATG wrote:

http://i16.tinypic.com/29c8fiq.jpg

Thats over 130000 death of civilians in American in the time since 9-11 and our Iraq invasion.


Motor-vehicle total deaths (1-year rule)#      43,788 ( 2001 )     45,380 ( 2002 )     44,757  ( 2003 )      46,200  ( 2004 )    46,800* ( 2005 )



I demand that our government do something immediatly about this horrible situation and further that everyone quit bitching about the 3000 Americans killed in a major theatre of war in that same time frame.

Further, 1/4 of a million people are killed each and every year IN AMERICA by DOCTORS misdiagnosing or otherwise blundering their cases. That's more people than the number of Kurds Saddam gassed and we called that practically a genocide.
http://www.relfe.com/doctors_kill.html

Can we stop the hand wringing and get to the serious business of the GWOT and commence with the invasion of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran already?

in a high pitched bitchy sissy voice   We've been fighting in the global War on terror for longer than we fought in World War 2, what giv-ez?
Unleash the Marines

Osama is in Pakistan, let's give them 72 hours to hand him over.   (    http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/sep/07osama.htm   )
Iran is supplying bombs to insurgents in Iraq; let's knock them silly and hang President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.    (     http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/a … oryid=6246     )
Most of the killers on 9-11 are from Saudi Arabia.   (  no link should be required on this one.  )

WTF are we waiting for?

( this is not a tongue and cheek thread )



if we are going to fight, then why don't we? This grotesqe execution of Saddam was yet another fumbling in the way we have conducted ourselves, and it was an embarrassment, almost as bad as Abu Ghraib imo.

I know it's too much to ask, but can we please take the gloves off, or get the fuck out and accept defeat.

This doing nothing is getting on my nerves.
http://i9.tinypic.com/2e0jng6.jpg


Given how many accidental deaths there are every year in America couldn't we afford a few thousand more per year to bring peace and freedom to the world?
I'm afraid that few in the rest of the world want your particular brand of 'peace and freedom'. Thanks but no thanks is the refrain. Even Iraq - a nation previously run by a cruel bloodthirsty despot (who was supported by the US for some extended period of time) - wants the US out (and some admit that conditions were better under Saddam). When will the US realise that nobody likes a busybody?

Wherever the US goes there will be suicidal resistance. The west needs to just shut up shop and close borders.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-03 08:30:33)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6820|Global Command
I guess my feeling is that if we leave them alone then at some point they will unite in a global jihad with nuclear swords.
We can't let that happen.

I don't know what the solution is. Sometimes I imagine a finale solution. More realistic is to just let the nukes fly ( meaning  , let Iran nuke Israel, India Pakistan, etc. ) if that's what they want.

Maybe then the outlawing of religion will be more palatable.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6846

ATG wrote:

I guess my feeling is that if we leave them alone then at some point they will unite in a global jihad with nuclear swords.
We can't let that happen.

I don't know what the solution is. Sometimes I imagine a finale solution. More realistic is to just let the nukes fly ( meaning  , let Iran nuke Israel, India Pakistan, etc. ) if that's what they want.

Maybe then the outlawing of religion will be more palatable.
The whole idea of imposing our will on others is exactly what has antagonised these peoples since the age of European colonialism began. Guerrilla resistance is now a tried and tested, almost always successful, method of preventing any intervention from succeeding ever again (where there is popular support for such action, for instance in the case of invasion/occupation). To accede to US or western demands will always illicit the charge of 'traitor' from peers. That has always been the case wherever a distant foreign power imposes its will on a group of people or a nation. Nuclear missile shield, effective defence policy and clever diplomacy/other forms of pressure are the way forward. Hell - when we stop fucking with them, relations might actually even normalise...

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-03 08:37:25)

EVieira
Member
+105|6769|Lutenblaag, Molvania

B.Schuss wrote:

Also, the concept of military supremacy looks a bit out-dated in this day and age, wouldn't you agree ?
At least the insurgents are not buying it. You had military supremacy over Iraq well before the war started, there was no doubt about that. You crushed Iraq's regular army within days.
But since then, the war in Iraq has turned into a stalemate at best. You are exchanging body bags for little to no considerable progress. Damage control ? euphemisms ftw..
Humm, good point. US military strategy against terrorism and guerrilla warfare isn't as effective as it is on open battlefields. Too bad they can't use the Russian strategy used on Chechnya: Give people a 48 hour notice before leveling the cities with artillery. Seemed to have worked on Grozny...
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6934

EVieira wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

Also, the concept of military supremacy looks a bit out-dated in this day and age, wouldn't you agree ?
At least the insurgents are not buying it. You had military supremacy over Iraq well before the war started, there was no doubt about that. You crushed Iraq's regular army within days.
But since then, the war in Iraq has turned into a stalemate at best. You are exchanging body bags for little to no considerable progress. Damage control ? euphemisms ftw..
Humm, good point. US military strategy against terrorism and guerrilla warfare isn't as effective as it is on open battlefields. Too bad they can't use the Russian strategy used on Chechnya: Give people a 48 hour notice before leveling the cities with artillery. Seemed to have worked on Grozny...
thats what we did in fallujah actually, gave them weeks to evacuate the city.  all  males between ages 15-40 something will be considered enemy combatants.  they had WEEKS to get out of dodge. but we didnt level the place with artillery, every building was cleared and recleared

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2007-01-03 09:12:41)

EVieira
Member
+105|6769|Lutenblaag, Molvania

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

... but we didnt level the place with artillery, every building was cleared and recleared
That right there is where they screwed up. You gotta level the place, otherwise what's the point? They'll just move back in. Kinda like what Israel did to some neighborhoods of Beirut.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6820|Global Command

EVieira wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

... but we didnt level the place with artillery, every building was cleared and recleared
That right there is where they screwed up. You gotta level the place, otherwise what's the point? They'll just move back in. Kinda like what Israel did to some neighborhoods of Beirut.
Perhaps that will be the next step.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6846

ATG wrote:

EVieira wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

... but we didnt level the place with artillery, every building was cleared and recleared
That right there is where they screwed up. You gotta level the place, otherwise what's the point? They'll just move back in. Kinda like what Israel did to some neighborhoods of Beirut.
Perhaps that will be the next step.
And therein you truly do become the unquestionable bad guys of the world (in reality - not in the perceived subjective kind of way that many look upon America today).

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-03 16:56:29)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6820|Global Command
I know, but, what to do when you truely believe Islamic fanatics threaten the survival of mankind?
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6934
these were the same conversations i would have with some of my friends while we were there.  if they let us go through and destroy everything, like the russians in chechnya or afghanistan there wouldnt be an insurgency.  But,  russia pulled out of afghanistan and chechnya is still a hot zone.
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|6860|Portland, OR, USA
...back on topic.

I've been thinking about that figure for some time.  People think of car crashes as an annoyance because it ties up traffic.  They never really think that people actually die!  It just goes to show how messed up our society really is...
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6846

ATG wrote:

I know, but, what to do when you truely believe Islamic fanatics threaten the survival of mankind?
The number of people who actually believe that is quite small. On a global scale I'd say the amount is infinitesmal. TV has a tendency to warp the mind.

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

these were the same conversations i would have with some of my friends while we were there.  if they let us go through and destroy everything, like the russians in chechnya or afghanistan there wouldnt be an insurgency.  But,  russia pulled out of afghanistan and chechnya is still a hot zone.
In the same way Oliver Cromwell levelled the city of Drogheda in Ireland, massacring the inhabitants: nearly 400 years later there isn't a Brit to be seen in Drogheda (except for tourists and economic migrants) and the Irish flag flies proudly!

Foreign dabbling rarely sits well with the indigenous folk and they'll eventually find a way of biting you on the ass.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-03 17:28:56)

hate&discontent
USMC 0311 SEMPER FI
+69|6679|USA, MICHIGAN
i didn't take the time to read everyones posts (sorry if this has already been said) but until the politicians that are in office stop being such conservative PUSSIES and let the U.S. Military flex their muscles and kick some serious ass we are all FUCKED.  let the Air Force bomb the shit out of them, let naval gunfire fuck everything else up, then send in the MARINES to kill what is left, then the Army to clean up what everyone else FUCKING DESTROYED!!!!!!!   just my two cents,  SEMPER FI.

Last edited by hate&discontent (2007-01-03 17:19:54)

madmurre
I suspect something is amiss
+117|7001|Sweden

hate&discontent wrote:

i didn't take the time to read everyones posts (sorry if this has already been said) but until the politicians that are in office stop being such conservative PUSSIES and let the U.S. Military flex their muscles and kick some serious ass we are all FUCKED.  let the Air Force bomb the shit out of them, let naval gunfire fuck everything else up, then send in the MARINES to kill what is left, then the Army to clean up what everyone else FUCKING DESTROYED!!!!!!!   just my two cents,  SEMPER FI.
That´s the stupidest thing i have read tonight
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6846

madmurre wrote:

hate&discontent wrote:

i didn't take the time to read everyones posts (sorry if this has already been said) but until the politicians that are in office stop being such conservative PUSSIES and let the U.S. Military flex their muscles and kick some serious ass we are all FUCKED.  let the Air Force bomb the shit out of them, let naval gunfire fuck everything else up, then send in the MARINES to kill what is left, then the Army to clean up what everyone else FUCKING DESTROYED!!!!!!!   just my two cents,  SEMPER FI.
That´s the stupidest thing i have read tonight
QFT
beerface702
Member
+65|6983|las vegas
damn 130000 car deaths a year.

that is uncalled for.

if we tallled all of the deaths from non -war related items..man

anyway i agree, nuke middle east, let's see what the dems can do in 07..and be done with it

go bush!
B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7132|Cologne, Germany

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

these were the same conversations i would have with some of my friends while we were there.  if they let us go through and destroy everything, like the russians in chechnya or afghanistan there wouldnt be an insurgency.  But,  russia pulled out of afghanistan and chechnya is still a hot zone.
well, I think unless you also kill everyone in the area ( and I mean everyone, women, children, the elderly, etc. ) the insurgency will go on. Homes can be rebuilt.

The problem is, if you start committing mass murder like that yourself, you can hardly claim the moral high ground any more. At that point, people will stop believing that you are actually doing the right thing...

Or do you want to be compared to the russians in aghanistan or chechnya ?

In that regard, I always remember the way the first gulf war was handled. Saddam was pushed back on his own territory, had to pay a shitload of reparations, and that was the end of that. A nice and clean operation, no insurgency.
eusgen
Nugget
+402|7083|Jupiter
Hurray for the world making no sense!

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard