i don't really like it. I think white chicks tend to be hotter then African chicks. plus i can never get the black ones to shut up and they get annoying. I think there is also a diffrence between racisim and profiling or sterotyping. I do however think it is ok to sterotype if the sterotype holds some truth.
This topic has gone way overboard.
Now for the record:
An Aryan is considered a white Caucasian person with blue eyes and blond hair, originating from Germany or the Sudetenland.
Now for the record:
An Aryan is considered a white Caucasian person with blue eyes and blond hair, originating from Germany or the Sudetenland.
Well, technically you could have all those features and not be an Aryan. Which is why racism is stupid.
wow
this thread got really de-railed without even trying lol.
tough luck neocommander about your pic you bellus endus.
this thread got really de-railed without even trying lol.
tough luck neocommander about your pic you bellus endus.
Pretty much every thread I start got derailed. I got a thread up to page 58 thoughShadow893 wrote:
wow
this thread got really de-railed without even trying lol.
tough luck neocommander about your pic you bellus endus.
racism is stupid, everybody should be free to date who ever it want !
Last edited by Mogura (2007-01-02 13:41:07)
there is nothing wrong with it. i have a chinese gf and my parents love her. took her parents a little while to get used to me though.
Remember Me As A Time Of Day
Funny how so many of you teach tolerance, yet refuse to have any for Christians.autopilot wrote:
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/860/ … derly3.jpg
Sorry, but I'm guessing you are christian too.
Also, back to the topic... If everyone became one race, fighting wouldn't stop. We still have religion, countries, territory, and plenty of other things to kill and die for.
Last edited by mKmalfunction (2007-01-02 22:58:49)
Or maybe he was pointing out firstly that, whilst the Catholic church and Christianity in general have a long association with racism, the bible doesn't preach it, and secondly that he ascribes to Nazi theory yet Nazism and Catholicism had a relationship which was rocky at best.mKmalfunction wrote:
Funny how so many of you teach tolerance, yet refuse to have any for Christians.
Neocommander, after reading through a lot of this thread, I've come to the conclusion that it's perhaps the forceful nature of government and the idea of not mixing races that you prefer, rather than the genocide and hate of the Nazies.
Because of this, I highly suggest changing your self-imposed label to something other than neo-Nazi. You're definitely a social conservative, but not truly Nazi. Fascist fits better, hence the reference in your sig.
As for the debate on the term "Aryan," this is a good starting point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan
The interpretation of the term that the Nazies preferred had implications that the mixing of Semitic people with the Aryans of Europe (generally regarded as non-Jewish white people) threatened the "purity" of the Aryan race.
However, the term Aryan mostly refers academically to people who settled in India and Iran. Technically, you could say that a lot of the first Europeans came from the Central Asia area, so by extension, they have some Aryan heritage. However, the most directly Aryan people that live today are Indian and Iranian.
I always found this rather ironic about the Nazies. They claimed to regard Aryans above everyone else, but in truth, they were supremacists of people who were only distantly Aryan. If they had instead used the term Nordic, then they would have made more sense with regards to terminology....
Of course, they'd still be racist bastards.
Because of this, I highly suggest changing your self-imposed label to something other than neo-Nazi. You're definitely a social conservative, but not truly Nazi. Fascist fits better, hence the reference in your sig.
As for the debate on the term "Aryan," this is a good starting point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan
The interpretation of the term that the Nazies preferred had implications that the mixing of Semitic people with the Aryans of Europe (generally regarded as non-Jewish white people) threatened the "purity" of the Aryan race.
However, the term Aryan mostly refers academically to people who settled in India and Iran. Technically, you could say that a lot of the first Europeans came from the Central Asia area, so by extension, they have some Aryan heritage. However, the most directly Aryan people that live today are Indian and Iranian.
I always found this rather ironic about the Nazies. They claimed to regard Aryans above everyone else, but in truth, they were supremacists of people who were only distantly Aryan. If they had instead used the term Nordic, then they would have made more sense with regards to terminology....
Of course, they'd still be racist bastards.