BF2S Forums Fox News IS the most biased news organisation in the World..

Fox News and Al Jazeera. Actually, Al Jazeera have an English channel. I wonder if Fox are gonna make an Arabic channel.

For more on this subject, check out Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0418038/

Whether you feel like these sources are biased or not, the evidence is overwhelming. I don't know if Fox is the most biased in the world, but it definitely has a bias.

Pug wrote:

News flash - all media sources are biased.

Probably didn't need to add that, but there you go...

No you did, people are stupid enough to believe that channels like MSNBC are unbiased.

Commie Killer wrote:

Pug wrote:

News flash - all media sources are biased.

Probably didn't need to add that, but there you go...

No you did, people are stupid enough to believe that channels like MSNBC are unbiased.

People are stupid enough to believe FOX News is "fair and balanced".

Kmarion wrote:

I would have to agree in the states.
If you think it's the worst i suggest you look in to Chinese media.

Very true.

Go to the Chinese google and look up Tiannemen square - not sure on spelling, then look it up on your normal version of google.

The article is slightly dated, but yes, Roger Ailes is a class A asshole.  He's a lot of the reason why the Republicans are able to win elections without having much of a platform to speak of.  It's Ailes's style of attack politics that renders neoconservatism an ideology without much foresight.  They're so busy attacking their opponents that they forget what they stand for....

On the other hand, Democrats made the same mistake back in 2004 by running Kerry.  No one really knew what he stood for because he just focused on not being Bush.

I guess the difference is that the Republicans are much better at "attack dog" politics, but that still doesn't seem to have done much for them when it comes to planning ahead in actual policymaking (like the lack of foresight shown during the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq).

At some point, both parties will need to realize that attacking your opponent is less important than defending your own views and actually having a clear message for the people.  Attack politics might win you a few elections, but it won't win things like the War on Terror.

Bertster7 wrote:

smtt686 wrote:

ok, great.  Now its official since its on the BF2S.com debate and serious trash forum

No. It's official since it's been found by FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting), who are an independent national (US based) media watch group.

The fact that FAIR only report on US media outlets means the OP is slightly inaccurate. FOX is the most biased in the US, but not in the world.

sorry bertster7, but that quote was a reference to some who believe that if it is read, its real.  nothing personal!

smtt686 wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

smtt686 wrote:

ok, great.  Now its official since its on the BF2S.com debate and serious trash forum

No. It's official since it's been found by FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting), who are an independent national (US based) media watch group.

The fact that FAIR only report on US media outlets means the OP is slightly inaccurate. FOX is the most biased in the US, but not in the world.

sorry bertster7, but that quote was a reference to some who believe that if it is read, its real.  nothing personal!

So your saying FOX isn't touting the line for the right wing agenda? Or anything you read is horsey poo?


/sarcasm
Please diregard any text books you have read throughout your whole educational existence. Because your a tool if you believe it.
/end sarcasm.

Last edited by Mason4Assassin444 (2006-12-27 16:27:49)

usmarine2007 wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Please diregard any text books you have read throughout your whole educational existence. Because your a tool

You may want to go read your books again.

pffffffffft

believe nothing you read, believe what Bill O'Reilly tells you to believe.

Last edited by Mason4Assassin444 (2006-12-27 16:42:18)

There's not such thing as a 100% unbiased News organization.  But you can say a few of them are less biased than the rest, and there you may include BBC for instance.