BF2S Forums wonder what Iran will do.

spray_and_pray wrote:

Ahmadinejad blew all his chances of being taken seriously that he wont create nukes when he started screaming out death to America in one of his speaches he is a stupid ignorant and I cant wait for someone to shoot the bastard he joins the same section in my brain where I keep Bush, Hitler, Kerry, Stalin etc.

Last edited by lowing (2006-12-24 05:25:21)

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

That is one crazy Iranian.

lowing wrote:

spray_and_pray wrote:

Ahmadinejad blew all his chances of being taken seriously that he wont create nukes when he started screaming out death to America in one of his speaches he is a stupid ignorant and I cant wait for someone to shoot the bastard he joins the same section in my brain where I keep Bush, Hitler, Kerry, Stalin etc.

I really find it hard to fathom that anyone would put Bush or Kerry in the same category as Hitler or Stalin. Even though I hate that no good dirty rotten POS Kerry, he is not a Hitler or Stalin, he simply woulda surrendered to them.

jonsimon wrote:

He wont do anything. Hell keep getting stronger and selling his oil for Euros. Eventually he will probably try to convince OPEC to switch to Euros as well, using his military as intimidation. He will probably to place oil embargos on Israel again. If the US makes the first move, he will trap our three sitting duck carrier groups in the Arabian sea and in doing so shut down the immediate supply of oil from the Arabian peninnsula to the world. He could even win a war against America. If we fight him it will be a long bloody unpopular war, and we will either end up losing completely or simply reinstating another puppet government that will eventually fall apart. The first thing we will do after toppling their government, assuming it happens, will be to open the Arabian sea and switch Iran back to the dollar. And thats that.

lowing wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/12/24/un.iran.ap/index.html

I wonder what Iran is prepared to do.

Well, since we are talking about Islamic extremists, my guess is, he will try and nuke someone in protest of being "falsely"accused of trying to build nukes. ( Kinda like the cartoon thing where the Muslims rioted and murdered over being depicted as violent and crazy.) That one still cracks me up, but not nearly as much as some people on this forum that ran to their defense and tried to rationalize it. So I offer this article to those that think Iran is innocent. Please, rationalize his rhetoric for me. Oh, and by the way, ya can't blame the US or Bush for this one, this was ALL your beloved UN.

jonsimon wrote:

Commie Killer wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

He wont do anything. Hell keep getting stronger and selling his oil for Euros. Eventually he will probably try to convince OPEC to switch to Euros as well, using his military as intimidation. He will probably to place oil embargos on Israel again. If the US makes the first move, he will trap our three sitting duck carrier groups in the Arabian sea and in doing so shut down the immediate supply of oil from the Arabian peninnsula to the world. He could even win a war against America. If we fight him it will be a long bloody unpopular war, and we will either end up losing completely or simply reinstating another puppet government that will eventually fall apart. The first thing we will do after toppling their government, assuming it happens, will be to open the Arabian sea and switch Iran back to the dollar. And thats that.

Smoking something? Im pretty sure that the US will not lose a war against Iran....

Its a possibility. Our military is stretched thin, occupying a hundred different countries at once. And their military is strong and home-grown. Plus three of our carrier groups are sitting ducks in the Arabian sea for no reason. It's certainly a possibility we could lose a war with Iran under our current conditions. Now, say, if we weren't occupying a large part of the world and were able to fight them in a sort of 1 v 1, they'd surrender or we'd crush them.

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Iran will not be a ground war, mark my words.

[UTQ]_Ausch88 wrote:

arson wrote:

lowing wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/12/24/un.iran.ap/index.html

I wonder what Iran is prepared to do.

Well, since we are talking about Islamic extremists, my guess is, he will try and nuke someone in protest of being "falsely"accused of trying to build nukes. ( Kinda like the cartoon thing where the Muslims rioted and murdered over being depicted as violent and crazy.) That one still cracks me up, but not nearly as much as some people on this forum that ran to their defense and tried to rationalize it. So I offer this article to those that think Iran is innocent. Please, rationalize his rhetoric for me. Oh, and by the way, ya can't blame the US or Bush for this one, this was ALL your beloved UN.

You know that the U.S. basically runs the U.N. by tightening the money right?  Why do you think there have not been sanctions against Israel for breaking the rules for which Iran is being punished. Im not saying that Iran shouldn't be punished but if stabilization of the Mid -East is the goal, how can one be punished and not the other when we KNOW that both are guilty. This can only add to an increasingly volitile situation.
  My Aunt works at the U.N. here in New York as a translator, and at our family holiday get together I sat down with her and we talked alot about the UN and the Mid- East situation.  Maybe I will start a thread whereas I can forward some of these well thought out questions to her so we can get some real time responses to what the talk inside the UN actually is.   I know it sounds rediculous but I really want stabilization in the Mid East and I am sick of innocents suffering for various goverments agendas.  So flame me all you want but I really want all the people to have the rights to pursue individual happiness as we can here in the U.S. and abroad.  Each country has something we can all learn from to make the world a better place.

Well said

jonsimon wrote:

Commie Killer wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

He wont do anything. Hell keep getting stronger and selling his oil for Euros. Eventually he will probably try to convince OPEC to switch to Euros as well, using his military as intimidation. He will probably to place oil embargos on Israel again. If the US makes the first move, he will trap our three sitting duck carrier groups in the Arabian sea and in doing so shut down the immediate supply of oil from the Arabian peninnsula to the world. He could even win a war against America. If we fight him it will be a long bloody unpopular war, and we will either end up losing completely or simply reinstating another puppet government that will eventually fall apart. The first thing we will do after toppling their government, assuming it happens, will be to open the Arabian sea and switch Iran back to the dollar. And thats that.

Smoking something? Im pretty sure that the US will not lose a war against Iran....

Its a possibility. Our military is stretched thin, occupying a hundred different countries at once. And their military is strong and home-grown. Plus three of our carrier groups are sitting ducks in the Arabian sea for no reason. It's certainly a possibility we could lose a war with Iran under our current conditions. Now, say, if we weren't occupying a large part of the world and were able to fight them in a sort of 1 v 1, they'd surrender or we'd crush them.

Commie Killer wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Commie Killer wrote:

Smoking something? Im pretty sure that the US will not lose a war against Iran....

Its a possibility. Our military is stretched thin, occupying a hundred different countries at once. And their military is strong and home-grown. Plus three of our carrier groups are sitting ducks in the Arabian sea for no reason. It's certainly a possibility we could lose a war with Iran under our current conditions. Now, say, if we weren't occupying a large part of the world and were able to fight them in a sort of 1 v 1, they'd surrender or we'd crush them.

There is an EXTREMLY small chance that they would sink even one of our ships above the destroyer level, a carrier being sunk is out of the question.

Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2006-12-24 12:35:00)