unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7197|PNW

Bernadictus wrote:

I believe in one thing tough, that the world will at last be in peace, the moment all religions disappear from the face of the earth.
While life exists, there can be no peace. Humans are an especially cantankerous species, and need no help from random dogmatic beliefs to butcher one another.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-12-22 19:52:55)

Donald O' Brien
Member
+104|7129

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Bernadictus wrote:

I believe in one thing tough, that the world will at last be in peace, the moment all religions disappear from the face of the earth.
While life exists, there can be no peace. Humans are an especially cantankerous species, and need no help from random dogmatic beliefs to butcher one another.
So true....we are a pretty messed up bunch.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #74 - edited for length . . . and it's still long   Better break out another hard drive BF2s.

ATG wrote:

. . .How does it effect your life that there are indigenous Mayans in South America who still worship the Sun? Who are you to say or suppose they face some sort of eternal persecution because they were never exposed to a book? . . .  I lived in a haunted apartment in California for a little over a year. Things flew about the house; I believe there is something out there. . . .

I would also enquire as to what other religious books you have read besides the Bible.
I have been to Catholic masses, Baptist churches where they speak in tongues and Rick Warrens Saddleback Church. My dad in Utah has three wives and is a excommunicated Mormon. I've read books on anthropology, the history of religion, ancient civilizations and Buddhism. I have read extensively on war and the Freemasons.  To be balanced, I am going to attempt to reread the Bible ( I think I may have skipped over some of the begat parts). I just find it perplexing how so many devout christians I have met have not looked outside their own faith.

I struggled with guilt for a few years, for not believing as you do. But then it occured to me that God expected me to question and to find a higher truth, whatever form that took. I felt at peace with my faith that the trees have souls and dream of sunny days and moist soil.
Thanks for the post, man.  Honesty and transparency is always appreciated, whether or not I agree with everything you believe.   
It does not affect my life that there are people of other religions who worship different gods.  Besides the fact that I hope someone goes to tell them about Jesus.  Perhaps you could clarify exactly what you’re driving at with that statement.  I know my eternal destiny is secure so I talk to as many people around me that will listen.  Maybe someday I will go to another nation. 

It is not me that’s passing judgment and saying anyone will face eternity without God.  I cannot judge anyone’s heart and to attempt to do so would be the definition of arrogant.  I can only compare the beliefs of others with the teachings of the Bible.  There are some things on which the Bible is not definitive and, in those cases, I put forth my own opinion.  Eternity is not one of them, though.  Repeatedly throughout the New Testament it is stated that salvation is freely offered through Jesus, but those who reject it face punishment for their sins. 

Regarding Mormonism, I would not call that Christianity.  If I understand correctly, Mormonism teaches God began as a mortal man who evolved to god status by his obedience to laws and ordinances.  That alone directly conflicts with the teachings of the Bible.  From what I’ve learned in my limited study, that is the only the tip of the iceberg regarding doctrines that directly contradict Christian teaching.
I, too, have experienced “hauntings” and to this day I know something was there. From my experiences, I believe it’s demonic activity, not human spirits traveling earth.  They mimic human activity or go right to revealing their true form.  Anyway, separate subject.  We could start a thread about that.

Your reading list sounds very interesting.  I have not delved very deep into the sacred texts of other religions.  The extent of my reading about world religions has taught me the basic teachings of various religions with the Eastern religions being the most fascinating to me.  Like you, I have been to Catholic masses and churches where people speak in tongues.  That last one freaked me right out the first time.  At one time or another I’ve attended a service of just about every denomination of Christianity.  I like the more relaxed version myself . . . my church has a full band (lead guitar, rhythm guitar, bass, piano, drums).  The church I grew up in was very strict, so I guess I’ve swung to the opposite.   

My reading from an early age focused on the military (mostly military history), various novels (Tom Clancy, Clive Cussler, John Grisham, etc), and various religious philosophers (C.S Lewis is one of my favorites).  The newest is Ravi Zacharius, I really enjoy his philosophical/logical approach to debate about truth and religion.  Ancient civilizations have always intrigued me, but I have not had the opportunity to explore that area to any degree.  History channel and National Geographic is about it - having young children really cuts into research time.  In my late teens and early 20s I seriously questioned why I chose to believe in Christianity.  What was my reason for belief?  The faith of my parents or actual truth?  Some of the people in my church called themselves Christians but their lives (judgmental, self-righteous, treating unbelievers as if they were the enemy) contradicted what I was reading in the Bible.  The contradiction extended to some of the teachings which seemed invented by these people to judge others waaay beyond what the Bible required.  I weeded out what was not true Christianity and proceeded to compare Christianity.  I'm thankful for several people who were brave enough to step up to my questions.  After my searching, I still found all the other religions depended on me doing something to be good enough to “earn” paradise or enlightenment.  In contrast, Christianity acknowledged the imperfection I saw in myself and asked me to believe in what Jesus did on the cross for my sins and then live as best as I could while following the teachings of Jesus.  In my opinion, Christianity is the truth and is much more practical than trying to walk a line of rules in order to “earn” paradise.  That said, I too, wish more Christians would really test their beliefs and be willing to find the answers to the hard questions that are asked about Christianity.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #75

SpaceApollyon wrote:

This thread is great, mainly thanks to Stingray and ATG.

My question to you Stingray, is as follows.
Are churches and (paid) priests a necessity for you to practice your faith? It seems to me that most of the bad things related to religion spring from the organization. When men are given powerful positions, some of them are bound to abuse those powers. Why elevate the status of these few individuals, when most religions teach equality? Why advocate such methods when they have so bloody consequences?

When you have your faith, couldn't a more personal and private form of worship be an alternative?
The institution has grown and grown - and the side affects with it - but still the majority of the population on earth are not Christians or any other religion and thus are doomed and on their way to hell.

In a nutshell: I think the benefits of this kind of institution cant counter the huge negative effects they have. A more personal faith could be as effective and those power hungry individuals would be out of the picture.
Churches and paid priests/ministers/pastors are not a necessity for me to practice my faith.  Without them I could still learn more about my faith, especially with modern technology that is available, but I think they are an asset for the most part.  The true Church is the people, not the building or the organization.  However, a genuine pastor can have a huge impact on his congregation in a positive manner.  I have had the privilege of learning from two different pastors whose teaching of the Bible helped deepen my knowledge of my faith.  I've also endured several pastors who were not helpful and I was glad to see them leave.

Your observation about the abuse of power springing from the organization is true in a way.  When the organization becomes the focus instead of God, things go downhill fast.  As I like to say, we humans are selfish wankers down deep.  The two pastors I mentioned are very humble men, even though they are very knowledgeable.  Though they are in leadership, they do not act superior.  Religion elevates individuals and has disastrous consequences.  In contrast, true faith asks for those with the most knowledge to teach others humbly with the goal of pointing them to follow God, instead of themselves.  It takes a special person to be able to suppress their own selfish nature to teach others.   

The more personal, private form of worship is an extremely important part of Christianity.  In my opinion it should be the focal point.  If all I do is go to a service once a week and never pursue anything on my own, my faith will grow very slowly - if at all.  In all the churches I’ve attended, I’ve been encouraged to study and pray on my own in addition to attending services.  I agree with your point that a more personal faith would be as effective and eliminate power issues for the most part.  A limited amount of organization might be necessary for practical purposes.

EDIT: on to page four!

Last edited by Stingray24 (2006-12-22 22:02:33)

Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #76

JahManRed wrote:

Great post ATG +1 Very enlightened.
I believe in the circle of life. Why are we different to a blade of grass or a cat? We are all living things. Do blades of grass have a heaven? I came to my conclusions about the after life in my teens, I believed in no souls for a time. Then I did a  Ouija board and stuff came out that no one else knows about me, but me. The guy doing it with me was talking to his brother who died in child birth, he is a boxer, hard hard as nails but he was crying like a baby so I know he had the same experience I had. It caused me to do more soul searching. Essence and Energy goes somewhere. After all, energy never disappears it only changes form. I think though its very presumptuous of the world at large to make decisions on what awaits our Energy after we die. It is impossible to know. Thats why I believe everyone should worship themselves as their own personal god.
I too am excited about what happens to my energy when I pass although i believe I won't be conscious as such so I won't be aware, but I will not believe the Bible, the Koran or whatever. They are obviously fictitious.
We are all living things, but we all serve different purposes.  To assign the same value to a blade of grass that a human possesses would make life extremely impractical and I would think it would hard to be consistent in that belief.  If the blade of grass has feelings, then you're committing brutal torture to the grass for several months out of the year.  Conservationism is one thing, but assigning so much value to nature to the point that it exceeds the value of human kind is not healthy in my opinion.  I would be very cautious of the Ouija board and anything a being would tell you from it.  You cannot identify truly who or what you're communicating with unless you ask it/them to reveal themselves visually.  I would not recommend that by the way, I had a friend who did that and the being that appeared scared the crap out of him.  Your beliefs regarding energy sound very similar to either the New Age or possibly some form of Buddhism or Taoism.   

Can I ask what caused you to believe the Bible is fictitious?
Ratzinger
Member
+43|6818|Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Oooooh yeah, gotta watch them ouija boards.

A friend of a friend said he once saw a horned devil with a pitchfork when he played with one.
Or was it on telly? Not sure.

Can I ask what caused you to believe the bible (sorry, Bible, don't want to upset any greater beings here) is NOT fictitious?
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Poke fun if you like.  I personally choose not to toy with the spirit world.  I would answer your question, but from the attitude in your post, you'll probably just ridicule my answer.  In light of that, your question will remain unanswered.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
I'm currently working on your questions, lowing.  Challenging questions that cause me to ponder.  Well done.
Luzer
Member
+0|6760
Stingray I like the post. I came to the forums for an answer to a question about BF2S and fell upon your post. I registered here just to reply.

I am an atheist. This will come accross offensive but I think people that are religious are simply uneducated.

Oganized religion is truly dissapointing and burdens science and technology. I'd like to think that the early christian intensions were good but its just big business and poltics now. For someone to stand proud of thier incompetence makes me sad, ill, and very dissapointed.

The worship a higher power came at a time thousands of years ago when human brains really started to develop and when man realized that one day he will die.
As simple as it may sound it is the fear of death. The religions/beliefs man have merely out of survival and self preservation.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command

Luzer wrote:

Stingray I like the post. I came to the forums for an answer to a question about BF2S and fell upon your post. I registered here just to reply.

I am an atheist. This will come accross offensive but I think people that are religious are simply uneducated.

Oganized religion is truly dissapointing and burdens science and technology. I'd like to think that the early christian intensions were good but its just big business and  poltics now. For someone to stand proud of thier incompetence makes me sad, ill, and very dissapointed.

The worship a higher power came at a time thousands of years ago when human brains really started to develop and when man realized that one day he will die.
As simple as it may sound it is the fear of death.  The religions/beliefs man have merely out of survival and self preservation.
Wow.
Where to begin.
1st of all,  welcome to the forum. As this appears to be your first post I'd like to acqaint you with the spell check button. I have to assume you are not American and English is a second language. May I be so bold as to suggest writting a draft in Word, then using spell/grammar check for clarity  and then posting?

sorry, i went all year without a grammar Nazi rant. I'm done now.

Last edited by ATG (2006-12-23 23:49:23)

unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7197|PNW

ATG wrote:

sorry, i went all year without a grammar Nazi rant. I'm done now.
Heil, brother.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7077|USA

Stingray24 wrote:

I'm currently working on your questions, lowing.  Challenging questions that cause me to ponder.  Well done.
thanks buddy.
Ratzinger
Member
+43|6818|Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Stingray24 wrote:

Poke fun if you like.  I personally choose not to toy with the spirit world.  I would answer your question, but from the attitude in your post, you'll probably just ridicule my answer.  In light of that, your question will remain unanswered.
Well that's a fair response. I am taking the piss but its so eminently pisstake-able.

I would still like to know about the moment "it all became clear" for you. Did you see a bright light, or anything like that, or was it more mundane?

I'm assuming it must have been mind-bogglingly stupendous to convince you in view of the lack of evidence and ridiculous postulates.
Fen321
Member
+54|6923|Singularity
From a Christian view point you have a Deity which is all powerful, all knowing, present, future, past etc. So now here is the kicker. You have this all powerful being create angels one of which is Lucifer. This being is all knowing so he knows very well what this Lucifer is going to do. So here is the catch he willingly creates a being which will now bring about the "fall" of man. So now you have a situation where man is now fallen, imperfect and stuck in this world which he apparently isn't from. So what better way to send himself via incarnation to save them from that which he put them into. You have Jesus whom is now going to save you from that which he created. So essentially you would have no reason for Jesus to save mankind if he had not created Lucifer. So now we have a dilemma here, this perfect Deity, essentially, his left hand is Lucifer and his right had is Jesus, but the catch is we pretend he doesn't know what the left hand is doing and go along with the entire story.


Please explain why God created Lucifer.....and we pretend....that he doesn't know of all the supposed bad things he will do to mankind.

Its all an illusion, a good one at that, but it does not work too well when you have a perfect Deity creating the problems before they start especially since he knows the outcome of everything apparently.

And for those that fear that not believing in this sort of God results in a afterlife which you are in a state of none existence simply needs to ask themselves can you experience NOTHINGNESS...you simply can not experience nothing, because the act of experiencing nothing is something..kinda doesn't work.

Last edited by Fen321 (2006-12-25 09:52:47)

Valium500mg.
Member
+3|6767
The main religions in the world are Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hindi, Seek, Bu dist. All these religions have a Heaven, the place you go after death. I am not sure if the Nudists have a god, Buda was a man who achieved spiritual perfection, Hindi believe in multiple Gods and reincarnation. the biggest difference in all these religions vs. Christianity is that they requirer spiritual perfection to enter Heaven, Christianity has by faith in Christ sacrifice the belief that we are forgiven and washed clean of our impurities and if you think Christians have a lock on being pushy about their faith turn of your computer and watch the news sometime
Valium500mg.
Member
+3|6767
Budist not Nudists ROFLOLA although the fear of being nude is what got us in trouble in the first place=D
Fen321
Member
+54|6923|Singularity
I could be wrong, but i don't believe Buddhist believe in an "place" called heaven. Nirvana does not equate to that, heck you achieve Nirvana while you are here on earth so once again i would argue against a place called heaven within Buddhism.

But yeah they don't equate Buddha to a Godhead, it simply means awakened one.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #78

lowing wrote:

Stingray, we are supporters of one another in this forum but I have a few questions as well.

1. Who on earth is qualified to tell me what happens to me when I die?

2. If there is someone qualified, what is his credentials and experience to be so qualified?

3. If man wrote the bible, and edited the bible (left out certain scripture and text because they felt it didn't belong) what qualifications did these men possess to become the editors of God?

4. Why, if there is only "one word" are there so many variants to the Christian faith?? Is it because Christians sculpt their beliefs to be more convenient to them? maybe looking for convenience over truth??

5. Why have Christians killed more people in the name of God, throughout history, than for any other cause?

6. Why, if our world is so full of God fearing Christians and Muslims is it so screwed up?

7. If Jesus was a JEW, shouldn't that be an indicator as to which religion we should all be scampering to be a part of??

These questions are NOT attacks on you Stingray, these are really questions that I have pondered over the years.
1&2 - Who on earth is qualified to tell me what happens to me when I die?  If there is someone qualified, what is his credentials and experience to be so qualified?

There are several facets to this question.  The first component is that only God knows your inner thoughts, so no matter what you tell those of us on earth, only He knows.  In light of that, no one is qualified unless you express your internal beliefs to them.  After comparing your beliefs with what God tells us about the afterlife in the Bible, we could arrive at an answer. 

3 – The men who wrote the Bible. 
The men who wrote the books of the Bible did so under the divine influence of God.  They penned words that were given to them supernaturally and they recorded them in their native language.  This categorizes their role as a hybrid scribe/author since an author formulates the words written and a scribe merely records the words.  The authors total more than 40 and come from every walk of life – kings, peasants, philosophers, fishermen, poets, statesmen, scholars, etc.  Those authors span over 1,500 years and 40 generations so there is not a template into which each author would fit regarding qualifications.  Throughout the Bible, God uses the most unlikely folks (in human terms) to be His messengers.   

The men who “edited” the Bible:
Books have been written about this subject and I am not extremely well-versed on the details, but I will attempt to give a satisfactory answer in short form.  To truly do the subject justice, it would be better to read a book containing research and have a conversation in person.  Here goes: In my view, the “books” which are now a part of the Bible were established by God and merely discovered by God’s people.  It’s really important to distinguish between the determination and the discovery of the books.  God is solely responsible for determining; God’s people are responsible for discovery.  Logically the books that were included were those that were reliable when compared to the testimony of eyewitnesses to the events recorded in the books.                     

4. Variants to the Christian faith –

Especially when regarding gray areas which are open to interpretation, some passages in the Bible can be understood differently.  Each of us possesses an intellect which has been exposed to different levels of knowledge on any given subject.  Knowledge of doctrine is no exception.  As I’ve studied the Bible, I’ve adjusted my beliefs when I discovered my views did not agree with Scripture.  Until I studied that area, though, my understanding was not entirely correct.  In my mind, the answers to some issues are completely obvious.  However, someone else may disagree who has a better understanding based on their study.  No matter what our views may be on the gray areas, there is one thing all true Christians agree on - that Jesus is the Messiah and provided salvation through His death and resurrection.  Certainly some Christians fashion their beliefs to justify the lifestyle with which they’re comfortable – this is a basic human flaw.  Another factor that comes into play is that there is a significant difference between head knowledge of doctrine and actually putting it practice.  In this life, none of us will ever live according to the teachings of the Bible with 100% consistency. 

5.  Christians have killed more in the name of God, than for any other cause. 

We’ve touched on this in other threads so I won’t repeat the whole topic here.  In a nutshell, I believe people who have called themselves Christians have used Christianity as a smokescreen to justify their murderous ways while serving their own selfish purposes – acquisition of wealth/power/land.  True Christians have not committed such acts.  I submit decidedly non-Christian people (Stalin, Hitler, etc) have killed more than those who misused Christianity for their own gain.

6. Why is the world so screwed up when it’s full of God fearing people?

We humans are selfish wankers, religious or not.  “Religious” people do their best to live their lives according to the principles of their faith, but we still have basic human nature with which to contend.  Most of the time our principles win, but sometimes they do not and things can go downhill fast.  I’m not so sure the world is bursting at the seams with God-fearing people.  There certainly are a lot of us running around, but I don’t think we outnumber non-religious people yet.  I’m open to statistics on that point.         

7.  Jesus was a Jew, why aren’t the rest of us trying to be?

Jesus was born a Jew, a descendent of the line of King David as prophesied in the Old Testament.  The Old Testament details the history of the Jews and the promise of the coming Messiah.  Jesus came to earth as described in the New Testament, but the Jews were expecting a warrior who would toss the Romans out and establish His kingdom.  Instead He came humbly, born the son of a carpenter, without the fanfare associated with the birth of a king.  The Jews rejected Jesus as Messiah because He did not fit the image of the Warrior King for which they longed.  During His time of ministry, Jesus challenged the Jewish religious leaders regarding their addition of their own rules on top of what was required of traditional Jewish believers.  The Pharisees had turned the focus to doing additional good work to please God, rather than the normal sacrifices which were involved in the worship of God.  Most of the Jews did not acknowledge Jesus as Messiah, but yet He gave His life for all humanity on the cross.  The focus changed from faith in a coming Messiah (Old Testament - Judaism) to faith in the Messiah Who completed His purpose (New Testament - Christianity).  Judaism paved the way for the arrival of Jesus and His establishment of Christianity.

Hope these responses have answered your questions to some degree, lowing.  Feel free to ask more if you like.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #83

TeamZephyr wrote:

I think we humans have come up with the concepts of heaven and reincarnation to distract ourselves from something we truly fear, that if we die we spend all of eternity not knowing anything and not existing.

I mean come on, an eternity of nothingness is a pretty scary concept.
Seems to me that consuming large amounts of beer and drugs would provide a much more effective distraction.  If I don't know anything and don't exist in eternity, might as well numb myself from the realities of this earth as much as possible.  Having no purpose beyond earth would be more depressing than scary if I had no faith.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #84

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

jimmanycricket wrote:

what sets us apart form other life forms is that we have the greatest power over our planet.
I would argue that our planet has power over us.
We certainly haven't completely harnessed nature, but we have the greatest power over our planet compared to the animal kingdom.  They don't build bridges, dams with hydroelectric plants inside, skyscrapers, etc etc
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
#85

Bernadictus wrote:

Christians, Muslims and Jews.

All the same big pile 'o converting, thought up by some weird old man in the middle of a dessert 4000 years ago, because he had nothing to do.
The 3 you list are very different, though Judaism and Christianity certainly are closely related.  I don't know what dessert has to do with it, though.  Couldn't resist.

Bernadictus wrote:

I believe in one thing tough, that the world will at last be in peace, the moment all religions disappear from the face of the earth.
So if Hitler had eliminated religion, the world would be at peace?  Hmmm.  I'm missing something here.
Ratzinger
Member
+43|6818|Wollongong, NSW, Australia
The bit you're missing is that the difference in mis-beliefs cause more conflict than those differences between the believers and non-believers. You fools have been killing each other for thousands of years (that's right, THOUSANDS) because THEY"VE got the wrong colour hat on.

That's a pretty big bit to miss.......
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #90

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

. . . The Bible is incomplete, and there are many writings which did not make it into the final version.  What about the Judas papers?  You know, the ones that indicate that Judas did not betray Jesus, but rather did what Jesus asked of him to fulfill the prophecy?
This whole subject hinges on what the Bible actually is.  The Bible is either God's inspired Word or merely the statement of beliefs of the early church, without any supernatural content.  How is it possible that there can be any lost books of the Bible?  If God is supernaturally overseeing it, then God is supernaturally involved in making sure His book gets written down and preserved.  If God is responsible for its writing, it's transmission and its survival then God, being God, does the job right.  God doesn't make mistakes, He doesn't forget things, He doesn't get confused about what is true and what is false, and He isn't absent-minded -- He doesn't lose his lessons.  Some may say that the supernatural element is bogus, but it's not really possible to think that God could lose His own book. 

For the sake of argument, let's assume the Bible isn't supernatural, it's a statement of beliefs of the leaders of the church.  If that's the case then who has the final word on which books belong in the Bible?  The leaders of the early church. By definition any books that they choose not to include are not part of the Bible.  It's their decision to decide which books represent their beliefs.  If they say the Gospel of Thomas or the Gospel of Judas doesn’t reflect the truth and somebody else picks it up two thousand years later and say it's a lost book of the Bible does that make it such?  It might be an ancient manuscript, a great archaeological find, a unique piece of literature, but a lost book of the Bible?  No.

What about the Judas papers? Ah, yes, the National Geographic announcement.   By literary standards, one document containing Gnostic philosophy hardly overshadows the vast collection of New Testament documents (24,000+) which the gospel of Judas contradicts.  Even the nearly 50 different documents contained in the Nag Hammadi manuscripts do not begin to come close.  They also do not fit the consensus I mentioned above.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #100

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Colfax wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:


Why should I? They'd just be preaching to the choir. I can do better as a Christian just by trying to live up to the moral standards of charity and kindness, rather than spending a couple of hours indulging in self-praise.
So your perfect and know everything about living a moral life?  How do you define your moral standards?  Because charity and kindness are biblical princples.  And i don't spend a couple of hours.  its about 30 mins really of actual "preaching" if you want to call it that.
And you and churches are perfect and know everything about living a moral life?
Certainly not.  No one on this earth knows everything about living a moral life.  That is why a church that teaches biblical principles and explains how to apply them in daily life is extremely important.  It is certainly commendable to try to live up to the moral standards of charity and kindness.  But why stop there?  All of us can always learn more.  From your post I'm guessing you had a less than favorable experience at a church.  I have too, but don't give up.  There are some great churches out there that have solid teaching.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
Post #101

Nicholas Langdon wrote:

i gave up on churches a long time ago, i believe they ruin religion. Not individual churches, but the hiearchy of power they create. When you bring that much power over peoples lives and "souls" it corrupts the people who have it and leads to things like the crusades and jihads, witch burnings and excommuincations. I find some of the basic teachings of the bible to have good intentions (do onto others.. the ten commandments) but the church itself is what is wrong with religion as far as I am concerned.
Perhaps this excerpt from my response to SpaceApollyon is appropriate here.

Stingray24 wrote:

Your observation about the abuse of power springing from the organization is true in a way.  When the organization becomes the focus instead of God, things go downhill fast.  As I like to say, we humans are selfish wankers down deep . . . Religion elevates individuals and has disastrous consequences.  In contrast, true faith asks for those with the most knowledge to teach others humbly with the goal of pointing them to follow God, instead of themselves.  It takes a special person to be able to suppress their own selfish nature to teach others.
Churches do have the potential to ruin religion.  I have experienced church leaders who have become infatuated with themselves as though they are actually superior to the rest of us.  That is not true Christianity in any way, shape, or form, but rather the polar opposite.  Churches also have the potential to demonstrate what Christianity was meant to be: a group of regular people (like me) gathered to learn more about God and help others.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard