BF2S Forums Should Europe join the United States?

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Europeans stink more then Americans. This is a fact comming from an Asian dude.

and asian people smell even worse same as the arabs. and your dicks are small.  When we join the usa, there is no more nude on tv and when there is nude they put those fucking blocks in front of it:S.
When the us joins europe, there is just full porn on tv during the day

CAM?

Europeans enjoy:

21-30 days annual leave a year + ~10 national holidays;
Steady economic growth;
High quality of life/standard of living due to generous social welfare, education and healthcare programs;
A culture that is based around 'working to live' rather than 'living to work';
Decent food;
Relatively small gaps between rich and poor;
Negligible levels of comparative gun and drug-related crime;
Beautiful architecture;
  Ok then answer me this, why is it that most muslims in europe as a whole are dirt poor and jobless? Why are there so many protests by them if europe is so well off? Riots and attacks in europe by them because of the social gaps(we arnt getting attacked by our own citizens on a weekly basis). Relatively small gaps between rich and poor? Thats not true, and your opinion on crime is lacking, The criminals have the guns, and there is or are alot of drug users in europe, places like russia make sure of that. Why actually the rates of gun use in england and affiliated parts of the UK have actually risen, Now, the gangs of kids in london and other places(that are a big problem) have shifted there attention to useing guns as a means of solving there disputes, where as it was Knives not too long ago. Rates of gun violence might be lower there, but it is on the rise none the less.

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

CAM?

Europeans enjoy:

21-30 days annual leave a year + ~10 national holidays;
Steady economic growth;
High quality of life/standard of living due to generous social welfare, education and healthcare programs;
A culture that is based around 'working to live' rather than 'living to work';
Decent food;
Relatively small gaps between rich and poor;
Negligible levels of comparative gun and drug-related crime;
Beautiful architecture;
  Ok then answer me this, why is it that most muslims in europe as a whole are dirt poor and jobless? Why are there so many protests by them if europe is so well off? Riots and attacks in europe by them because of the social gaps(we arnt getting attacked by our own citizens on a weekly basis). Relatively small gaps between rich and poor? Thats not true, and your opinion on crime is lacking, The criminals have the guns, and there is or are alot of drug users in europe, places like russia make sure of that. Why actually the rates of gun use in england and affiliated parts of the UK have actually risen, Now, the gangs of kids in london and other places(that are a big problem) have shifted there attention to useing guns as a means of solving there disputes, where as it was Knives not too long ago. Rates of gun violence might be lower there, but it is on the rise none the less.

Those muslims of which you speak are:
a) Not homeless
b) Not hungry
c) Not going to be turned away when in need of medical assistance
d) Comparatively speaking - not poor, because social welfare pays their way through life

France has social problems when it comes to muslims. Most other EU countries don't.

Everything else I said, in relative terms compared against USA, stands true (including the gun crime bit).

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-16 06:03:12)

UON wrote:

Actually the experts I talked to say that the US will be bankrupt in a couple of years and totally fall apart... they'll be begging for medical supplies, and we'll be like "remember a certain tea party? fuck you", and they'll be "pleeeeeeeeeease" and we'll be like "no", and the Christians will take over England and they'll be fascist militia on the streets of London and the government will kill loads of people with bio weapons tests and blame it on terrorists and then this dude will make everyone rise up against the government and then everyone in England will be happy and most Americans will be dead or dying, then we might allow them to buy some medicine if they become a colony again and pay taxes to the Crown and everyone will happy because Americans can't handle independance due to lack of foresight and England likes oppressing people but would rather they were in another country, especially as it hasn't had much of chance lately thank you very much.



edit: The US is the national equivalent of Enron... destined to become a shell....

If the government would stop spending money on the war and such, then maybe we wouldn't go bankrupt.  Nobody voted in 2000 or 2004 for president either so we have the retarded president that started all this and made it that much worse.  We're a couple trillion $ in debt, so the next 2 years can't come soon enough.  The only thing that sucks is that Hilary Clinton is probably going to be the next president, which would suck because there would be no more guns or porn, which is an absolutely ridiculous and feminist thing to do.

Would it make any difference? Being English I have over the years bacome more accustomed to an American Ideaology! What with all the TV shows, politics etc that go on, but hey I would never say that I was an American. And anyway America is historically a European Country that has grown to have its own identity over the centuries? Just throwing something in there for you all:)

adam1503 wrote:

I think American should become a British colony again.  You clearly aren't responsible enough to run your own country yet, let us do it for you until you can be trusted .

British Empire then:



British Empire now:

adam1503 wrote:

Your point?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

Most experts agree that over the next few years, most European countries will have been annexed by the United States. The main reason most European countries have already agreed to their statehood within the United States is due to the obvious economic benefits. However, when this happens, do you think European culture will begin to lose its uniqueness as it is absorbed into the US melting pot? Although this is inevitable, I will still ask for your opinion anyway. Do you think this should happen, and why or why not?

Where is your experts?  Can we get some sources?  There are other places that will join the Union before any European country.  Purteo Rico for one, they should become part of the USA, before any European country.

For the next question, would they loose their uniqueness?  Look at Hawaii.  They still have their culture, they are completely different then the US.  I do not think that anyone would loose their uniqueness.  Just look at parts of the north east USA.  You still can have different sections of people that are unique.  There are still a lot of places where Itialians live, or Germans.  I am for sure if you are from the states you have heard the term, Little Italy, or Little Mexico, etc.

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

adam1503 wrote:

Okay, but in what way is your post ironic?

It is ironic that you claim were are irresponsible and should become a British colony again while Britain is only a small fraction of what it used to be.

You clearly misunderstand the concept of irony.

adam1503 wrote:

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

adam1503 wrote:

Okay, but in what way is your post ironic?

It is ironic that you claim were are irresponsible and should become a British colony again while Britain is only a small fraction of what it used to be.

You clearly misunderstand the concept of irony.

Umm, you're sounding really dumb right now so you might as well shut up and just admit fail.

adam1503 wrote:

Oh calm down, it wasnt a serious suggestion.   Just like your suggestion that the EU should join the US.

I know but let me explain the irony he was suggesting
The irony of your post was you were suggesting that  "clearly you aren't responsible enough to run your own country yet" . Yet you managed to dwindle away the size of your empire. Now you proclaim you should manage the United States?  It's like the drunk guy trying to take the keys away from the sober driver at the bar.

Last edited by Kmarion (2006-12-16 18:54:31)

CameronPoe wrote:

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

adam1503 wrote:

You clearly misunderstand the concept of irony.

How so? You claim that the most powerful nation in existence is irresponsible and should become a colony of a tiny country that lost all of its land and colonies, and is only a small shadow of its former self.

I'd say there's a few valuable lessons to be learned there for the 'American Empire'. What goes up, ultimately tends to come crashing down.

I guess you can only hope to be on top during your lifetime. Sweet.

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

The only way the American Empire is going down is through peace. That means that the entire world, or the US and many other countries, would have to unite under one new government. Nuclear weapons ensure that if we go "crashing down" any other way, we're taking the rest of the world with us. History will not repeat itself due to the nuclear element.

That attitude is what is so dangerous about the US.  You think you rule the rest of the world because you are a superpower.  That makes you dangerous, and you dont seem to realise this.