BF2S Forums Removing Grenades in Infantry Only

I voted no. Remove the nades and there will be even more snipers with claywhores.

SpawnKiller wrote:

yah and why not nade launchers and at rockets  and ground defense and claymore.  Howa bout no c4 or flash grenades.  Definitely no uav.  How about no scopes on sniper rifles or no sights on the rest for the guns.  god that would make the game better.  Oh and i got pwned by i knife lets get rid of those 2.   Maybe then more people would be happy.   

People whined about  tanks and shit now all people complain about is infantry only nade spammers.  For all the complainers heres a game for you  http://www.kidzworld.com/site/p3994.htm

STOP WHINEING AND DEAL WITH IT

OMG OMG OMG I LOVE THAT GAME *faints*

Lmfao...:0

Ok, I think people are mistaking this for a whine thread.

I will agree with the OP in that jalalabad might be more fun if grenades were limited to 1. However resupply should be enabled.

Personally I go assault(smoke) and flank groups of enemies. I create a squad and have them spawn in while I keep moving. Eventually we get past and then it is an urban battle. If people in my squad don't follow me around they get booted from the squad.

Nade spamming sucks ass, the getting rid of the nades all together idea is appealing but there are no doubt many situations in IO where they can be used sensibly... I think reducing the amount of grenades and other bulky ammo to some physically possible amount and then raising the resupply time would work. I'm fairly sure that 2 grenades is the standard amount in most regular armed forces, and it's just not possible to carry more than one missile tube. The moaners complaining about how anyone who expresses an interest in changing the game slightly want all the weapons to be the same and have anything vaguley explosive castrated need to grow up. 7 year olds can win arguments with methods better than blatant exaggeration of other peoples wishes.

AFFROPANDA wrote:

Nade spamming sucks ass, the getting rid of the nades all together idea is appealing but there are no doubt many situations in IO where they can be used sensibly... I think reducing the amount of grenades and other bulky ammo to some physically possible amount and then raising the resupply time would work. I'm fairly sure that 2 grenades is the standard amount in most regular armed forces, and it's just not possible to carry more than one missile tube. The moaners complaining about how anyone who expresses an interest in changing the game slightly want all the weapons to be the same and have anything vaguley explosive castrated need to grow up. 7 year olds can win arguments with methods better than blatant exaggeration of other peoples wishes.

So true, people don't exaggerate a suggestion I considered please!

Yes, teamwork is a way to get past the grenade spamming, but honestly how many people on an IO server wants teamwork?

I need a clan....

ShowMeTheMonkey wrote:

Damn them! I love the things that go boom! Though have you tried getting out of the US base on 64 IO Jalalabad? Took me ages! And even then I was blown up by a dozen grenades while capping the base!

Stop thinking this is another whine about the game!

i agree mate on IO....but i also love to nade out as well when im unleashing the beast!! i think its swings and roundabouts mate. it is annoying when i cant get out of the base for frags, but then again i make sure i return the favour next round, and so the cycle continues....i'll sit on the fence on this one.  good thread tho.+1 to you mate.

Id rather have gunless jeeps and dpvs than removing grenades.  Some kind of transport would break up that 'swarm of naders' effect that IO has.