i have noticed there are a lot of people that complain "such and such is an (insert vehical type) whore" on this forum and then the explination is that they have a high k/d ratio with vehicals but there k/d with there infantry weapon is low.
how can this be a determination?
from my understanding k/d is determined by killing someone with a weapon vs. being killed while holding that same weapon. it doesn't consider way to many variables to beable to say this person is good at this but bad at that. its easier to die as infantry so its expected you k/d should be lower then when your in a vehical.
so why does this seem to so often be the determination on if your a vehical whore or infantry.
also who is so stupid to run past a vehical (that might give a little bit of an edge on a game your TRYING TO WIN) and just try to run to the next way point just to realize the guys in the vehicals were already there and took the flag.
like i said just curious why is such a poorly determined stat so defining of a character?
how can this be a determination?
from my understanding k/d is determined by killing someone with a weapon vs. being killed while holding that same weapon. it doesn't consider way to many variables to beable to say this person is good at this but bad at that. its easier to die as infantry so its expected you k/d should be lower then when your in a vehical.
so why does this seem to so often be the determination on if your a vehical whore or infantry.
also who is so stupid to run past a vehical (that might give a little bit of an edge on a game your TRYING TO WIN) and just try to run to the next way point just to realize the guys in the vehicals were already there and took the flag.
like i said just curious why is such a poorly determined stat so defining of a character?