| AH-64D Apache (US, UK, Israel, Japan, etc.) | 61% | 61% - 94 | ||||
| Eurocopter Tiger (Germany, France, Spain, Australia) | 15% | 15% - 24 | ||||
| Mi-28 Havoc (Russia) | 3% | 3% - 6 | ||||
| Mi-24 Hind (Russia, North Korea, Iran, India, etc.) | 0% | 0% - 1 | ||||
| AH-1 Cobra (US, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Iran, etc.) | 11% | 11% - 17 | ||||
| A129 Mangusta (Italy) | 0% | 0% - 1 | ||||
| Kamov Ka-50 (Russia) | 4% | 4% - 7 | ||||
| AH-2 Rooivalk (South Africa) | 1% | 1% - 3 | ||||
| Total: 153 | ||||||
Someone playing BF2 a little too much? All those helicopters you mentioned were BF2 choppers.ts-pulsar wrote:
It's a toss up between the Super Cobra and the Havoc for me.
And the Chinese WZ-10 should really be on that list.
http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/hel … wz102l.jpg
So many tests, as in one test that sounds like a competition more than a test.Bertster7 wrote:
Many tests. Like the Turkish design competition that the KA-50-2 came second in after the Cobra, beating the Apache and Eurocopter.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
God you are dumb. How can you say something like "many" tests and still say it's not as good overall.Bertster7 wrote:
Because Russian 'shit' is cheap, high quality and probably the best value military tech available. Developing your own weapons costs loads of money.
The KA-52 has outperformed the Apache in many tests. I doubt it's as good overall, but I bet it's much cheaper.
The KA-50 is not so good though.
Anyways, I don't know much about rl choppers, as I'm sure none of you do either, but the military channel voted the Apache number 1.
Yet on performance and general expert opinion the Apache seems to be top. Mostly down to it's extreme high tech targeting systems.
I know very little about choppers. I have studied turboprops (my lecturer stuck one in the back of an estate car and used it for drag racing, it was one of the student group projects (1800bhp)) in a course on gas turbine engines and I have done courses dealing with rockets and missile tech, but that doesn't help much. I go on what the experts say.
Last edited by doctastrangelove1964 (2006-12-07 15:07:54)
Are you saying a competition isn't a test?Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
So many tests, as in one test that sounds like a competition more than a test.Bertster7 wrote:
Many tests. Like the Turkish design competition that the KA-50-2 came second in after the Cobra, beating the Apache and Eurocopter.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
God you are dumb. How can you say something like "many" tests and still say it's not as good overall.
Anyways, I don't know much about rl choppers, as I'm sure none of you do either, but the military channel voted the Apache number 1.
Yet on performance and general expert opinion the Apache seems to be top. Mostly down to it's extreme high tech targeting systems.
I know very little about choppers. I have studied turboprops (my lecturer stuck one in the back of an estate car and used it for drag racing, it was one of the student group projects (1800bhp)) in a course on gas turbine engines and I have done courses dealing with rockets and missile tech, but that doesn't help much. I go on what the experts say.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2006-12-07 15:08:06)
It must be crazy to sit in something so small and able to go so fast and do crazy menuevers.blademaster wrote:
comanche best chopper ever cant believe u did not list it
http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2307 … manche.jpg
Well, when it's a design competition to see who's made the best helicopter, I'd call that a test. In fact, since the competition was made up of a number of challenges then that's what it is a number of tests.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Depends on what the competition is.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2006-12-07 15:23:21)
You are thinking of the RAH-66 Comanche which the program was canceled 2004 or 2005. It isnt black but pretty close.MDFSpacePhantom wrote:
Don't the US have a new one I for got whats it called, but it's black?
its not needed, so it would just be a waste of moneyPspRpg-7 wrote:
Too bad the Comanche didn't get to mass production.
Not in production for the PLA yet.ts-pulsar wrote:
It's a toss up between the Super Cobra and the Havoc for me.
And the Chinese WZ-10 should really be on that list.
http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/hel … wz102l.jpg
Last edited by Hellogoodsir (2006-12-07 22:12:22)
LOL actually I didn't know the havoc was in BF2. I never play special forces cause it's insanely laggy for me.haffeysucks wrote:
Someone playing BF2 a little too much? All those helicopters you mentioned were BF2 choppers.ts-pulsar wrote:
It's a toss up between the Super Cobra and the Havoc for me.
And the Chinese WZ-10 should really be on that list.
http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/hel … wz102l.jpg
AH-64 Longbow.
