Just thought i'd post this.
The BFROE channel is on:
Gamesurge: #Bfroe
The BFROE channel is on:
Gamesurge: #Bfroe
fish eggs?doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
What's wrong with ROE?
They're too 1337 for it.doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
What's wrong with ROE?
I second this motionstraz_mataz wrote:
Fuck The Bfroe
Gooood Question....someones waiting...whatching....stay alert.Marlboroman82 wrote:
so which one of you is the catcher?
Roflesspawnofthemist wrote:
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/884/ … bfdid3.jpg
Let me put this nicely.Contract_Killa wrote:
Just thought i'd post this.
The BFROE channel is on:
Gamesurge: #Bfroe
buttsechs?cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
This shows how much people hate the ROE.
PB suspends account that hacks or cheats, ROE won't do shit. ROE is pointless since a lot of people who break those rules don't really give a shit.Magius5.0 wrote:
So why do we hate the BFROE? Aren't they the guys that suspend accounts for people who exploit/cheat/stat-pad/hack/do stupid stuff? Or is there something blatantly obvious I'm missing that would instantly make me say 'Fuck the BFROE, yeah!'
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!!! !!!!! STATS ARE LIFE!!!!!!!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
PB suspends account that hacks or cheats, ROE won't do shit. ROE is pointless since a lot of people who break those rules don't really give a shit.Magius5.0 wrote:
So why do we hate the BFROE? Aren't they the guys that suspend accounts for people who exploit/cheat/stat-pad/hack/do stupid stuff? Or is there something blatantly obvious I'm missing that would instantly make me say 'Fuck the BFROE, yeah!'
How are you supposed to code against K/P servers? Make it so only 3 people at a time can have their knife or pistol out in the server? Yeah, that would fail.TrollmeaT wrote:
Code it , Don't ROE it. -opschief
BFROE doesn't suspend anyone. They try to sort out the reports of people cheating in someway and then send it to EA along with any proof (screenshots you send).Magius5.0 wrote:
So why do we hate the BFROE? Aren't they the guys that suspend accounts for people who exploit/cheat/stat-pad/hack/do stupid stuff? Or is there something blatantly obvious I'm missing that would instantly make me say 'Fuck the BFROE, yeah!'
Last edited by Dex Luther (2006-12-02 10:03:04)
BFROE didn't come from EA, it came from Indianscout and he proposed the idea to EA.Dex Luther wrote:
How are you supposed to code against K/P servers? Make it so only 3 people at a time can have their knife or pistol out in the server? Yeah, that would fail.TrollmeaT wrote:
Code it , Don't ROE it. -opschief
You can't code away all the problems. It'll just create more problems.
It'd be a lot easier if people would follow the rules set by EA, but that'll never happen. So a 3rd party stepped in to help out.BFROE doesn't suspend anyone. They try to sort out the reports of people cheating in someway and then send it to EA along with any proof (screenshots you send).Magius5.0 wrote:
So why do we hate the BFROE? Aren't they the guys that suspend accounts for people who exploit/cheat/stat-pad/hack/do stupid stuff? Or is there something blatantly obvious I'm missing that would instantly make me say 'Fuck the BFROE, yeah!'
People don't like BFROE because from what I can tell people think BFROE is making up it's own rules. The rules posted by BFROE come directly from EA.
The idea of BFROE maybe, but the rules weren't written by BFROE. The rules come from EA.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
BFROE didn't come from EA, it came from Indianscout and he proposed the idea to EA.Dex Luther wrote:
How are you supposed to code against K/P servers? Make it so only 3 people at a time can have their knife or pistol out in the server? Yeah, that would fail.TrollmeaT wrote:
Code it , Don't ROE it. -opschief
You can't code away all the problems. It'll just create more problems.
It'd be a lot easier if people would follow the rules set by EA, but that'll never happen. So a 3rd party stepped in to help out.BFROE doesn't suspend anyone. They try to sort out the reports of people cheating in someway and then send it to EA along with any proof (screenshots you send).Magius5.0 wrote:
So why do we hate the BFROE? Aren't they the guys that suspend accounts for people who exploit/cheat/stat-pad/hack/do stupid stuff? Or is there something blatantly obvious I'm missing that would instantly make me say 'Fuck the BFROE, yeah!'
People don't like BFROE because from what I can tell people think BFROE is making up it's own rules. The rules posted by BFROE come directly from EA.
KP servers eh? I think theres nothing wrong with it, since everyone has their right to play on it, I don't think it will be unfair stats. Why the fuck do you care so much about someones stats?
Last edited by Dex Luther (2006-12-02 10:18:59)
.............,-~*'`¯lllllll`*~,._Dex Luther wrote:
The idea of BFROE maybe, but the rules weren't written by BFROE. The rules come from EA.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
BFROE didn't come from EA, it came from Indianscout and he proposed the idea to EA.Dex Luther wrote:
How are you supposed to code against K/P servers? Make it so only 3 people at a time can have their knife or pistol out in the server? Yeah, that would fail.TrollmeaT wrote:
Code it , Don't ROE it. -opschief
You can't code away all the problems. It'll just create more problems.
It'd be a lot easier if people would follow the rules set by EA, but that'll never happen. So a 3rd party stepped in to help out.
BFROE doesn't suspend anyone. They try to sort out the reports of people cheating in someway and then send it to EA along with any proof (screenshots you send).
People don't like BFROE because from what I can tell people think BFROE is making up it's own rules. The rules posted by BFROE come directly from EA.
KP servers eh? I think theres nothing wrong with it, since everyone has their right to play on it, I don't think it will be unfair stats. Why the fuck do you care so much about someones stats?