Are you talking about the news, or the opinion shows?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I think FOX is just the easiest one to attack. I can see they're all biased with wording and story choice, but on Fox the bias is just...dripping.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98408usmarine wrote:
Are you talking about the news, or the opinion shows?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I think FOX is just the easiest one to attack. I can see they're all biased with wording and story choice, but on Fox the bias is just...dripping.
dripping.
Honestly I don't watch the news enough to immediately recognize which station it is, but halfway during that, I was thinking please don't be Fox news....lol
I don't consider viewpoint on opinion shows, I look at skill of the host.
I think a lot of people don't bother to make a distinction. I have no problem with their news coverage (I watch it). O'Reilly is nuts sometimes, but eh, he's commentary. Not news.usmarine wrote:
Are you talking about the news, or the opinion shows?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I think FOX is just the easiest one to attack. I can see they're all biased with wording and story choice, but on Fox the bias is just...dripping.
?????Flaming_Maniac wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98408usmarine wrote:
Are you talking about the news, or the opinion shows?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I think FOX is just the easiest one to attack. I can see they're all biased with wording and story choice, but on Fox the bias is just...dripping.
dripping.
Honestly I don't watch the news enough to immediately recognize which station it is, but halfway during that, I was thinking please don't be Fox news....lol
I don't consider viewpoint on opinion shows, I look at skill of the host.
He reported the news. What the hell is wrong with that clip?
I didn't see a bias either.usmarine wrote:
?????
He reported the news. What the hell is wrong with that clip?
"Bus crashes into the lake"SenorToenails wrote:
I think a lot of people don't bother to make a distinction. I have no problem with their news coverage (I watch it). O'Reilly is nuts sometimes, but eh, he's commentary. Not news.usmarine wrote:
Are you talking about the news, or the opinion shows?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I think FOX is just the easiest one to attack. I can see they're all biased with wording and story choice, but on Fox the bias is just...dripping.
Its the same no matter what you watch. They all report the same. But the idiots think the opinion shows somehow tilt that? fuck come one people.
...... he reported the facts, didn't give any personal comments
I guess he should have reported as its the cheifs faults for not learning spanish
I guess he should have reported as its the cheifs faults for not learning spanish
You obviously did not read my post. I find it difficult to be civil to someone who disregards most of my post, relying only on the title and the first two lines. I never said that FOX news viewers are the only ones in touch with reality. I find it rather whimsical that you deem FOX to be the most biased. If only...Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
lol.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Wow.... Thanks.... This is not what I was expecting. I thought that this would start with a flame and end with a deeply embittered debate. I had no idea you all were so reasonable! Well, it's good to know that there are still at least some people who are in touch with reality.
so are you saying that only FOX news viewers are in touch with reality?
please don't give me that bullshit. i know that all news/all forms of the media are biased... thats just how it is...
but FOX by far takes the cake when it comes to terrible, biased journalism. news stations are not around to give opinion, their job is to inform... not to deleive biased news peices that the majority of their audience wants to hear
It sickens me that this can possibly be a refutable political issue. That is a case of pure stupidity. In fact, I think that it was completely acceptable. FOX did nothing biased here. They merely exposed a stupid policy. That is exactly what I want my news source to do.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=98408
dripping.
Honestly I don't watch the news enough to immediately recognize which station it is, but halfway during that, I was thinking please don't be Fox news....lol
I don't consider viewpoint on opinion shows, I look at skill of the host.
I find it amusing and funny with all the Fox bashing in a country where otherwise the rest channels are pro liberals.. but one republican god no that aint good.
amusing AND funny?
I´m a foreigner i´m allowed to be stupid some say i have mixed personalities too.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
amusing AND funny?
I'd say just redundant.madmurre wrote:
I´m a foreigner i´m allowed to be stupid some say i have mixed personalities too.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
amusing AND funny?
The red team has talk radio. The blues can't seem to gain much of a foothold there.madmurre wrote:
I find it amusing and funny with all the Fox bashing in a country where otherwise the rest channels are pro liberals.. but one republican god no that aint good.
CNN beat FOX last quarter in viewership...a trend to be repeated going forward. THe jig is up..people are awaking from their propaganda based stupors. usmarine...WAKE UP!!
Who the fuck reads blogs or regards them as 'news'?usmarine wrote:
its funny that people are so passionate about fox news, yet have no problem with blogs.
true stupidity.
Everyone does have their own bias. Defending against your view of reality has become exceedingly easy of late due to poor OP construction and weak arguments. Check out some of the topics running at the moment. Perhaps you'd care to respond to even very simple questions in them requiring yes/no answers....lowing wrote:
The problem is, and you see it in this forum plain as day, everything and everyone is considered biased, bigoted, racist etc.. when it goes against the liberal opinion.
It is their only defense against reality.
In your reality freedom of religion, enshrined in the constitution of your own country, seems to be some sort of horrid crime signalling the downfall of humanity. So much so that you can't even bring yourself to recognise the fact that your country defends freedom of religion by answering a simple question. Your arguments swing around self-defeatingly proclaiming Islam is violent on the one hand and then, when pressed with the reality of things, stating that most Muslims 'aren't real Muslims' on the other. I wouldn't be surprised if your next topic states your fear that the sky is in fact falling in.
As to the OP:
Fox News sucks big black dick.
CNN sucks dick too. Most Europeans won't realise that because we get a sanitized version of CNN over here in Europe. If you visit the US you'll realise how insidious CNN is too.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-04-09 01:21:25)
i ASKED if you were saying that only FOX viewers are in touch with reality... read my post properly plzDeadmonkiefart wrote:
You obviously did not read my post. I find it difficult to be civil to someone who disregards most of my post, relying only on the title and the first two lines. I never said that FOX news viewers are the only ones in touch with reality. I find it rather whimsical that you deem FOX to be the most biased. If only...Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
lol.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Wow.... Thanks.... This is not what I was expecting. I thought that this would start with a flame and end with a deeply embittered debate. I had no idea you all were so reasonable! Well, it's good to know that there are still at least some people who are in touch with reality.
so are you saying that only FOX news viewers are in touch with reality?
please don't give me that bullshit. i know that all news/all forms of the media are biased... thats just how it is...
but FOX by far takes the cake when it comes to terrible, biased journalism. news stations are not around to give opinion, their job is to inform... not to deleive biased news peices that the majority of their audience wants to hear
and "the first 2 lines... there are only 2 lines! and tell me which part i didnt address
Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2008-04-09 01:39:29)
The corporate media is extraordinarily biased towards business interests and the government by it's very nature. They are huge corporations trying to sell advertising space to other businesses. Corporate media runs from the centre to the far right. The left wing barely even appears as a footnote in the mass media.
People bash FOX because they bill themselves as fair and balanced to a massive audience. People bash blogs, too, but they don't get nearly the same kind of exposure, so they don't get nearly the same kind of bashing. Not realising that is "dumb fucking idiocy".usmarine wrote:
well people do not bash them to the point they bash a network. So it shows the dumb fucking idiots of the interweb.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Is there even such a thing as an objective blog.
Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
lol.
so are you saying that only FOX news viewers are in touch with reality?
That sounded like a sarcastic rhetorical question to me.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
i ASKED if you were saying that only FOX viewers are in touch with reality... read my post properly plz
and "the first 2 lines... there are only 2 lines! and tell me which part i didnt address
I can see why he didn't address it.
hehe true.SenorToenails wrote:
Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
lol.
so are you saying that only FOX news viewers are in touch with reality?That sounded like a sarcastic rhetorical question to me.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
i ASKED if you were saying that only FOX viewers are in touch with reality... read my post properly plz
and "the first 2 lines... there are only 2 lines! and tell me which part i didnt address
I can see why he didn't address it.
but still if he can tell me wat he was actually saying that will be fine.
because as far as i can tell he said that anyone that says FOX is biased are not in touch with reality.
Last edited by Little BaBy JESUS (2008-04-09 01:50:23)
It looks like he was saying that he prefers the conservative bias as opposed to the liberal bias in news reporting. I reread his post (albeit quickly) and I didn't see anything that implied a "if you don't watch fox, you are out of touch with reality" opinion.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
hehe true.
but still if he can tell me wat he was actually saying that will be fine.
because as far as i can tell he said that anyone that says FOX is biased are not in touch with reality.
Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Wow.... Thanks.... This is not what I was expecting. I thought that this would start with a flame and end with a deeply embittered debate. I had no idea you all were so reasonable! Well, it's good to know that there are still at least some people who are in touch with reality.
really? i couldnt find that meaning in that post?SenorToenails wrote:
It looks like he was saying that he prefers the conservative bias as opposed to the liberal bias in news reporting. I reread his post (albeit quickly) and I didn't see anything that implied a "if you don't watch fox, you are out of touch with reality" opinion.
Hah! I read the OP, not that one. Sorry!Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Wow.... Thanks.... This is not what I was expecting. I thought that this would start with a flame and end with a deeply embittered debate. I had no idea you all were so reasonable! Well, it's good to know that there are still at least some people who are in touch with reality.really? i couldnt find that meaning in that post?SenorToenails wrote:
It looks like he was saying that he prefers the conservative bias as opposed to the liberal bias in news reporting. I reread his post (albeit quickly) and I didn't see anything that implied a "if you don't watch fox, you are out of touch with reality" opinion.