I helped out a little bit with this one ............ they wanted a little help on calling in airstrikes
they are going for realistic
they are going for realistic
i'd play that
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
I HOPE THEY HAVE J10's SO I CAN PWN THE US LOLOLOLOL
Canadianloser wrote:
I HOPE THEY HAVE J10's SO I CAN PWN THE US LOLOLOLOL
or show you how advanced (or not advanced) the j-10 really is.Canadianloser wrote:
I HOPE THEY HAVE J10's SO I CAN PWN THE US LOLOLOLOL
I may get it, but that means in need a new joystick. I'm not into flying games that much though. They are sweet, but frustrating at times.
Ill get it for Xbox so I can play against all my friends and say things like "The force is strong with this one" or "I have you now!"
("theres to many of them!" "its a trap!")
("theres to many of them!" "its a trap!")
r u 4 srs?SEREMAKER wrote:
I helped out a little bit with this one ............ they wanted a little help on calling in airstrikes
Is there 2 seaters, like an F15?
even if there isn't, this game cannot possibly fail
brings a whole new meaning to j10 whore
even if there isn't, this game cannot possibly fail
brings a whole new meaning to j10 whore
"another forum" - wasn't that this forum?GorillaTicTacs wrote:
Because the working title was "Firehawk" at one time, but the name was leaked and some people on another forum were discussing it and thought it sounded like a "helicoper game". Marketing picked up on it and hence we went through a 3-day naming session to find a new name for the game. We didn't come to any conclusions, so the Ubisoft "Military Authenticity Coordinator" at Redstorm came up with the idea for HAW-x. Ubisoft went with it.Mutantsteak wrote:
I wouldn't buy a game called Tom Clancy's HAW, yeeeeeeeeee hawwwwwwwwDoctaStrangelove wrote:
Why did they need the "X" at the end if it doesn't stand for anything?
Damn we got two people on this forum claiming to be part of the development of this game....
Were so damn leet.
Were so damn leet.
That stuff about PMCs just smacks so much of Blackwater to me. Lulz.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
IGN just posted a new hands on preview:
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/876/876567p1.html
Release Date=Sept 10 2008
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/876/876567p1.html
Release Date=Sept 10 2008
I added that to the front page in the first part of many updates. Thanks!Rohirm wrote:
IGN just posted a new hands on preview:
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/876/876567p1.html
Release Date=Sept 10 2008
I'm pretty sure GTactics is legit.VicktorVauhn wrote:
Damn we got two people on this forum claiming to be part of the development of this game....
Were so damn leet.
Su-35/37's with Aim-9's? Sorry guys but this game is not for me.Rohirm wrote:
IGN just posted a new hands on preview:
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/876/876567p1.html
Release Date=Sept 10 2008
Last edited by csmag (2008-05-26 18:36:42)
Can't wait till it comes out. Think i'll get it on PC.
for my birthdayRohirm wrote:
IGN just posted a new hands on preview:
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/876/876567p1.html
Release Date=Sept 10 2008
If they're going for realism, you'd think they would have worked with military pilots to get the in-game dialogue and anti-SAM kinematic defeat maneuvers down. That trailer on page one was pretty, but cocked up from a realism perspective.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Who cares about such realism when you have sexy planes, awesome cities and the power to blow up shit?FEOS wrote:
If they're going for realism, you'd think they would have worked with military pilots to get the in-game dialogue and anti-SAM kinematic defeat maneuvers down. That trailer on page one was pretty, but cocked up from a realism perspective.
I can't wait.
SEREMAKER wrote:
I helped out a little bit with this one ............ they wanted a little help on calling in airstrikes
they are going for realistic
Really?
For the preview trailer that was released 6-7 months before release surely depicts how the game will play.FEOS wrote:
If they're going for realism, you'd think they would have worked with military pilots to get the in-game dialogue and anti-SAM kinematic defeat maneuvers down. That trailer on page one was pretty, but cocked up from a realism perspective.
Well, GorillaTicTacs supposedly works on this game, and since they were both in the military, I wouldn't be surprised to see SERE in the credits D:Mek-Stizzle wrote:
SEREMAKER wrote:
I helped out a little bit with this one ............ they wanted a little help on calling in airstrikes
they are going for realistic
Really?
im done with flight simulators. last one was the final f-15 made in 1998.
Well have they released a better one?Poseidon wrote:
For the preview trailer that was released 6-7 months before release surely depicts how the game will play.FEOS wrote:
If they're going for realism, you'd think they would have worked with military pilots to get the in-game dialogue and anti-SAM kinematic defeat maneuvers down. That trailer on page one was pretty, but cocked up from a realism perspective.
I thought not.
I wasn't talking about gameplay, as you can't really get that from a trailer (regardless of the age).
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular