twiistaaa wrote:
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Nothing explains what came before the Big Bang. In all honesty, creationism is the best explanation for it.
not really. creationism is just the easiest to understand.
ask plato to send a message from england to australia within seconds and he will tell you its impossible.
we know better now, right? but are you smarter then plato. no.
in 1000 years time the same question will be posed. "ask stephen hawking to travel between universe A to universe B". is it impossible? "ask richard dawkins to prove life begun because of a process called X". is it impossible?
In all honesty just because the simplest reasoning is the easiest (to understand) explanation for "it" doesn't make it so.
we are still dumb as shit in terms of "it all"... don't throw away a FUCKING answer so quickly... if we settled for creationism we may as well wrap our woman up in sheets and nail theives to crosses.
I don't think you read the rest of my posts.
It's the only explanation right now. The Plato example doesn't hold up because it's not like we haven't discovered the technology to look past the Big Bang, it is literally impossible according to our current laws of physics. Unless someone proves many, many of our current laws wrong and comes up with a way to breach causality, there can be no way to come up with a scientific explanation, complex or not.
Bf2-GeneralArnott wrote:
The universe has 11 dimensions, some of which are so small they are curled up and forgotten about.
big maybe
Bf2-GeneralArnott wrote:
The matter flew apart, and is still expanding infinately, known as red shift.
We see the light coming from other planets shifted in the red direction because of the Doppler Effect, and that means they are moving away
from us. Other planets are in fact blue shifted, not everything is going away from us. Red shift is not just the term used for the expansion of the Universe.
Bf2-GeneralArnott wrote:
Stars give off nuclear energy, and when they die they expand, and, if they were big enough they collapse in on themselves after a super nova, causing a black hole, one of which is at the centre of our galaxy, and, because the Earth's ever expanding orbit is, well expanding, we may kindof run into it.
Stars expand during later portions of their life cycle when they are fusing certain elements, not when they die.
The Earth is not going to fall into a black hole because of its expanding orbit, it will fall into a black hole because our solar system is moving towards the black hole. The whole shebang is going in.
Bf2-GeneralArnott wrote:
To find the ultimate theory of how we were created, which is what Stephen Hawking is working on, you have to combine 2 theories, Einstine's theory of the very large, and the theory of the very small (atoms) (quantum mechanics or something) anyway, you have to make these fit together, which is where Hawking is stuck, he found out that they combine at the edge of black holes, where the positive atoms escape the hole, but the negative atoms go down.
Combining General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
I don't know about him finding the answer at the edges of black holes...what he did discover is at the very edge of a black hole, particles are actually split at the horizon, where one side gets drug into the black hole and the other side is free on the other side. This process emits x-rays, which we can use to detect black holes. I'm not sure how he used this to combine GR and QM.
Kmarion,
A Brief History of Time and
The Universe in a Nutshell should be required reading, they are so easy to understand.
