Fuck your fast! Wheres that pic from /b/ that came with the OP on 4chan this morning? Or you didn't save it?
Oh dear. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.Criminal wrote:
and you know what... hell 100 marines could probably annihilate the entire british army of the presentcoke wrote:
I can read, just not the future... edit he made about there being no artyCriminal wrote:
cant you douche bags read...
he said neither sides have artillery which in the british case means their cannons and shit.
and im pretty sure m16s and m4s > muskets
so
go marines
1 sniper = british fail
they also treatied warfare a lot different 230 years ago then we would today .... they would want to meet on the battlefield for a "gentlemens" fightgeNius wrote:
You're talking about thousands of lines in several directions. Do you honestly believe that the Brits were such horrible shots that they wouldn't eventually kill a simple 100?Poseidon wrote:
1) The british stood in a fucking line. A FUCKING LINE. I know it's the 18th century, but COME ON. They couldn't think of something better than standing in a fucking open field?
This may have been 230 years ago, but they were not stupid.
marines would just sneak in at night, slit those on firewatch and set up satchel charges .... boom .....also destorying there moral
Last edited by SEREMAKER (2008-03-15 19:10:23)
Agreed on point 1. Up to the fucking Civil War, people would stand there and stare at each other before charging with their muskets. WTF.Poseidon wrote:
Marines. By far. Reasons being:
1) The british stood in a fucking line. A FUCKING LINE. I know it's the 18th century, but COME ON. They couldn't think of something better than standing in a fucking open field?
2) Superior firepower. Amazing aiming.
3) Snipers.
4) M240.
5) Kevlar.
6) Overall knowledge.
7) If the Brits didn't have cannons or artillery, they'd be so fucked against the marines.
Unless your commander's name is Leonidas, you all have chiseled abs, and are well-versed in phalanx formation, you DON'T do that.
So IO?Undetected_Killer wrote:
WAIT READ BELOW BEFORE FLAMING
By entire British Army, I mean the entire British Army from the American Revolutionary War period, i.e. 1775 to 1781 versus 100 Modern Day United States Marines. Both have uncountable supplies of ammo. Both sides fight to the death.
Who wins?
P.S. For the sake of argument, neither sides have artillery, or in the Marines' case, helis, tanks, or armored vehicles.
P.P.S. Both armies are armed with the weapons from their own time period.
WAIT READ ABOVE BEFORE FLAMING
Yh but no nade spamming pl0x.David.P wrote:
So IO?Undetected_Killer wrote:
WAIT READ BELOW BEFORE FLAMING
By entire British Army, I mean the entire British Army from the American Revolutionary War period, i.e. 1775 to 1781 versus 100 Modern Day United States Marines. Both have uncountable supplies of ammo. Both sides fight to the death.
Who wins?
P.S. For the sake of argument, neither sides have artillery, or in the Marines' case, helis, tanks, or armored vehicles.
P.P.S. Both armies are armed with the weapons from their own time period.
WAIT READ ABOVE BEFORE FLAMING
Extreme nationalism ftl.Criminal wrote:
ahh didnt catch that.coke wrote:
I can read, just not the future... edit he made about there being no artyCriminal wrote:
cant you douche bags read...
he said neither sides have artillery which in the british case means their cannons and shit.
and im pretty sure m16s and m4s > muskets
so
go marines
sorry fine sir
and you know what... hell 100 marines could probably annihilate the entire british army of the present
K but claymores are in, And Half our team gets to be Medics with G36e's. Dont tell jamesey.Ollie wrote:
Yh but no nade spamming pl0x.David.P wrote:
So IO?Undetected_Killer wrote:
WAIT READ BELOW BEFORE FLAMING
By entire British Army, I mean the entire British Army from the American Revolutionary War period, i.e. 1775 to 1781 versus 100 Modern Day United States Marines. Both have uncountable supplies of ammo. Both sides fight to the death.
Who wins?
P.S. For the sake of argument, neither sides have artillery, or in the Marines' case, helis, tanks, or armored vehicles.
P.P.S. Both armies are armed with the weapons from their own time period.
WAIT READ ABOVE BEFORE FLAMING
jingoism, stupidPoseidon wrote:
Extreme nationalism ftl.Criminal wrote:
ahh didnt catch that.coke wrote:
I can read, just not the future... edit he made about there being no arty
sorry fine sir
and you know what... hell 100 marines could probably annihilate the entire british army of the present
Learn your vocab, sophomore.
It's a deal bbz!David.P wrote:
K but claymores are in, And Half our team gets to be Medics with G36e's. Dont tell jamesey.Ollie wrote:
Yh but no nade spamming pl0x.David.P wrote:
So IO?
Well, how much ground soldiers exactly made up the entire British Army back in the Revolution? According to Wiki (I know, not the best source) it says 12,000 for the regular British Army.
Well, a heavy machine gun would be the only thing to use against a bunch of soldiers fighting in lines...
This is just a silly question really.
Well, a heavy machine gun would be the only thing to use against a bunch of soldiers fighting in lines...
This is just a silly question really.
K see ya there ya limey tea sucking bastards!Ollie wrote:
It's a deal bbz!David.P wrote:
K but claymores are in, And Half our team gets to be Medics with G36e's. Dont tell jamesey.Ollie wrote:
Yh but no nade spamming pl0x.
Am I the only one who thinks this is a waste of time to be discussing, seeing as how it could never farking happen?
If empire earth 2 is anything to go by the English army would win by shear numbers
moar liek fagomore am i ritecowami wrote:
jingoism, stupidPoseidon wrote:
Extreme nationalism ftl.Criminal wrote:
ahh didnt catch that.
sorry fine sir
and you know what... hell 100 marines could probably annihilate the entire british army of the present
Learn your vocab, sophomore.
Yes, you are. It's always fun to imagine these kinds of scenarios, a nice mature [by BF2S standards] debate about some obscure subject is where it's at, yo.NateWiese wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this is a waste of time to be discussing, seeing as how it could never farking happen?
Last edited by Ollie (2008-03-15 19:47:57)
Yes.NateWiese wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this is a waste of time to be discussing, seeing as how it could never farking happen?
And the (300) Spartans lost... remember.HurricaИe wrote:
It'd be like 300. If the Marines have a ground advantage they'd rape face. Better trained and better equipment.
I remember nothing!DrunkFace wrote:
And the (300) Spartans lost... remember.HurricaИe wrote:
It'd be like 300. If the Marines have a ground advantage they'd rape face. Better trained and better equipment.
All i remember is the smack down they were able to put on the persians.Ollie wrote:
I remember nothing!DrunkFace wrote:
And the (300) Spartans lost... remember.HurricaИe wrote:
It'd be like 300. If the Marines have a ground advantage they'd rape face. Better trained and better equipment.
If they had the prince then maybe.
Last edited by David.P (2008-03-15 19:55:01)
they were also against a million Persians, and eventually a shitload of ImmortalsDrunkFace wrote:
And the (300) Spartans lost... remember.HurricaИe wrote:
It'd be like 300. If the Marines have a ground advantage they'd rape face. Better trained and better equipment.
After that, 10K spartans and 30K normal greeks kicked the asses of the Persians
I got an awesome question we can debate over.Ollie wrote:
Yes, you are. It's always fun to imagine these kinds of scenarios, a nice mature [by BF2S standards] debate about some obscure subject is where it's at, yo.NateWiese wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this is a waste of time to be discussing, seeing as how it could never farking happen?
If the pope has superpowers, was 10 feet tall, and carried a m60 at all times, would muslim extremists pose as much of a threat as they do?
Last edited by NateWiese (2008-03-15 19:54:21)
No, but I bet Rambo and Duke Nukem would wonder where their kid had got to.NateWiese wrote:
I got an awesome question we can debate over.Ollie wrote:
Yes, you are. It's always fun to imagine these kinds of scenarios, a nice mature [by BF2S standards] debate about some obscure subject is where it's at, yo.NateWiese wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this is a waste of time to be discussing, seeing as how it could never farking happen?
If the pope has superpowers, was 10 feet tall, and carried a m60 at all times, would muslim extremists pose as much of a threat as they do?
Not with this pope.NateWiese wrote:
I got an awesome question we can debate over.Ollie wrote:
Yes, you are. It's always fun to imagine these kinds of scenarios, a nice mature [by BF2S standards] debate about some obscure subject is where it's at, yo.NateWiese wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks this is a waste of time to be discussing, seeing as how it could never farking happen?
If the pope has superpowers, was 10 feet tall, and carried a m60 at all times, would muslim extremists pose as much of a threat as they do?