9800GTX 3dmark06 test

2008-02-26 03:09:57

#1

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6609|Finland

Omg... that is huge disappointment to me. Not really a big surprise since the only difference is slightly higher clockspeeds compared to GTS. Not worth upgrading from 8800GTX for that 5% more performance... And if the price will be anywhere near the estimated $400, that is just not worth it.

https://en.expreview.com/img/2008/02/26/9800GTX.jpg

edit: link added http://en.expreview.com/?p=280

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-02-26 03:12:02)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-26 03:14:07

#2

Mr.E: HakLaw in the house; +103|6755

people will still but it though.

2008-02-26 03:15:27

#3

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6760|Area 51

Lameee...

2008-02-26 03:18:18

#4

StormEye: Sniper; +50|6840|Malibu

RDMC wrote:
Lameee...

2008-02-26 03:19:50

#5

xGj: Official lame Crysis fanboy.; +84|6566|Netherlands tbh

Nooo.. I was hoping for that killer card to run Crysis decently Guess I'll have to wait longer again (and no im not going to waste 1000+ euros on 3way sli)

2008-02-26 03:27:35

#6

White-Fusion: Fuck; +616|6746|Scotland

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Omg... that is huge disappointment to me. Not really a big surprise since the only difference is slightly higher clockspeeds compared to GTS. Not worth upgrading from 8800GTX for that 5% more performance... And if the price will be anywhere near the estimated $400, that is just not worth it.

http://en.expreview.com/img/2008/02/26/9800GTX.jpg

edit: link added http://en.expreview.com/?p=280

So its 5% better than the GTX for about £100 less? or did you mean GTS instead of GTX?

2008-02-26 03:34:21

#7

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6609|Finland

White-Fusion wrote:
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Omg... that is huge disappointment to me. Not really a big surprise since the only difference is slightly higher clockspeeds compared to GTS. Not worth upgrading from 8800GTX for that 5% more performance... And if the price will be anywhere near the estimated $400, that is just not worth it.

http://en.expreview.com/img/2008/02/26/9800GTX.jpg

edit: link added http://en.expreview.com/?p=280
So its 5% better than the GTX for about £100 less? or did you mean GTS instead of GTX?

because G92 GTS ~ 8800GTX it doesn't matter. and it is +$100 more compared to GTS.

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-02-26 03:34:54)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-26 03:35:32

#8

White-Fusion: Fuck; +616|6746|Scotland

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
White-Fusion wrote:
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Omg... that is huge disappointment to me. Not really a big surprise since the only difference is slightly higher clockspeeds compared to GTS. Not worth upgrading from 8800GTX for that 5% more performance... And if the price will be anywhere near the estimated $400, that is just not worth it.

http://en.expreview.com/img/2008/02/26/9800GTX.jpg

edit: link added http://en.expreview.com/?p=280
So its 5% better than the GTX for about £100 less? or did you mean GTS instead of GTX?
because G92 GTS ~ 8800GTX it doesn't matter. and it is +$100 more compared to GTS.

A GTX is $300 - £150 now?

2008-02-26 03:35:35

#9

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6911

I'll wait for gaming benchmarks. What if it does shit in 3d Mark and awsm at gaming?

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2008-02-26 03:37:05

#10

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6609|Finland

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
I'll wait for gaming benchmarks. What if it does shit in 3d Mark and awsm at gaming?

It has identical chip as 8800 GTS G92 + 25mhz higher core clock. Think again how big improvement it is...

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-02-26 03:37:21)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-26 03:38:06

#11

White-Fusion: Fuck; +616|6746|Scotland

https://www.tacticsoverprinciples.org/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2118.0;attach=287;image

I'll wait for the 9800 GT2

2008-02-26 03:38:38

#12

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6609|Finland

White-Fusion wrote:
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
White-Fusion wrote:

So its 5% better than the GTX for about £100 less? or did you mean GTS instead of GTX?
because G92 GTS ~ 8800GTX it doesn't matter. and it is +$100 more compared to GTS.
A GTX is $300 - £150 now?

GTX is about 300€ now. GT selling at 199€ and GTS at 269€. the new GTX is estimated to be in >350€ price range.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-26 05:07:26

#13

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6392|Winland

The 9 series is rushed. They should make a new fucking core, and call this one 8800GTX G92. Same with the 9600; 8600 rev 2.

nVidia is letting people down with the 9 series. Hard.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-02-26 05:09:39

#14

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6760|Area 51

They'd better make a decent 9800GT card, if that is ever going to come. I am not going to wait for some card that is 100 euro's more expensive and only brings a 5% increase.

2008-02-26 05:10:09

#15

Dr_3V|L: Member; +51|6920|Twente, The Netherlands

That's surprisingly bad.

2008-02-26 05:12:56

#16

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6762|NYC / Hamburg

. Oh well, at least that means that my SLI'ed 8800GT aren't outdated

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2008-02-26 05:13:45

#17

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6609|Finland

RDMC wrote:
They'd better make a decent 9800GT card, if that is ever going to come. I am not going to wait for some card that is 100 euro's more expensive and only brings a 5% increase.

9800GT is 8800GT OC with two SLi connectors.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-26 05:17:02

#18

^*AlphA*^: F*ckers; +3,135|6933|The Hague, Netherlands

not worth updating my 8800GTX to it then?

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png

2008-02-26 05:19:07

#19

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6762|NYC / Hamburg

^*AlphA*^ wrote:
not worth updating my 8800GTX to it then?

no

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2008-02-26 05:44:42

#20

xGj: Official lame Crysis fanboy.; +84|6566|Netherlands tbh

Hey we don't know if it's all true yet though. Still, Expreview has given me good predictions in the past.

2008-02-26 05:59:38

#21

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6848

When an actual 9 series card is released that isn't a revamped 8***, they should name it the 9999GTX

2008-02-26 06:11:20

#22

JaMrulezass: Member; +47|6659|Hong Kong

It cant be that bad right? Shit, if it really sucks that big cock then I think ATI will take back NVIDIA.

I cannot hope but believe that this is photoshopped.

2008-02-26 06:21:43

#23

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6762|NYC / Hamburg

JaMrulezass wrote:
It cant be that bad right? Shit, if it really sucks that big cock then I think ATI will take back NVIDIA.

I cannot hope but believe that this is photoshopped.

Well it's just a G92 8800GTS 512MB thats overclocked ...

Last edited by max (2008-02-26 06:21:53)

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2008-02-26 06:28:54

#24

mikeyb118: Evil Overlord; +76|6793|S.C.

max wrote:
JaMrulezass wrote:
It cant be that bad right? Shit, if it really sucks that big cock then I think ATI will take back NVIDIA.

I cannot hope but believe that this is photoshopped.
Well it's just a G92 8800GTS 512MB thats overclocked ...

This ^^. I have doubts about this supposed 9800GTX.

2008-02-26 06:32:15

#25

xRBLx: I've got lovely bunch of coconuts!!; +27|6550|England - Kent

Im just gonna wait a lil long and get a 2nd 8800GTX tbh.

BF2S Forums 9800GTX 3dmark06 test

RDMC wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

White-Fusion wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

White-Fusion wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

White-Fusion wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

White-Fusion wrote:

RDMC wrote:

^AlphA^ wrote:

JaMrulezass wrote:

max wrote:

JaMrulezass wrote:

Board footer