Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7052|132 and Bush

310,000,000 > 45K. Celebrities are weird. It's not exactly late breaking news .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7212

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

I dunno, maybe a bunch of assholes following a nutjob leader (watch the videos).  This can't be considered a Religion, not yet.  Maybe all Religions started as a cult.  In fact, Scientology is not even a cult, but a business.
Funny that the Vatican is one of the largest real estate owners in the world.  Not to mention their art collection.  But, I guess that is not business, it is what Jesus wanted.
Anyone?
OrangeHound
Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...
+1,335|7100|Washington DC

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

I dunno, maybe a bunch of assholes following a nutjob leader (watch the videos).  This can't be considered a Religion, not yet.  Maybe all Religions started as a cult.  In fact, Scientology is not even a cult, but a business.
Funny that the Vatican is one of the largest real estate owners in the world.  Not to mention their art collection.  But, I guess that is not business, it is what Jesus wanted.
The answer is "No."  But, in fairness, the Catholic Church was much MUCH worse in the past, and they have really changed quite a bit.

And, I would also like to say that the typical Christian Church in America (aka, Country Clubs for the Middle Class) are likely not what Jesus would want.

So, yeah, no one is smelling very good ...

There are some exceptions, but it is a low percentage.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7212

Point is, he is saying it is not a religion because it is a business, and because it is full of celebs.  Yet I show you the Catholic church has WAY more money and WAY more celebs then scientology, but it is somehow invalidated.  I don't get it.  I think they are nutjobs, but I think the same about every religion.  Some just take it further than others.

So, since we can see the Catholic church is a bigger fraud than scientology, why does nobody bash the catholic church?

Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-16 10:50:29)

OrangeHound
Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...
+1,335|7100|Washington DC

There are going to be business aspects to any religion that has a institutional aspect to it ... even the Jesus People of the 60's and 70's had to coordinate some business things.

Perhaps the distinction is based on cost of participation.  One can participate fully in the Catholic Church and never pay a penny, though there are some expectations of honorariums for things such as marriage, annulment, etc.  (still, these can be free).

Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7212

OrangeHound wrote:

Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised.  Last time I checked that cost money.

Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-16 11:24:58)

Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6940|Gogledd Cymru

usmarine wrote:

OrangeHound wrote:

Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised.  Last time I checked that cost money.
Not where i'm from, church is free.

Scientology isn't.
daddyofdeath
A REAL Combat Engineer in the house
+187|6704|UK Bradford W,Yorks. Age 27
Basically I think we are all in agreement that Scientology is a CULT and a load of bollocks!
OrangeHound
Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...
+1,335|7100|Washington DC

usmarine wrote:

OrangeHound wrote:

Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised.  Last time I checked that cost money.
No it doesn't ... as I said, there is an expected "honorarium" or an expected donation, but one can be baptized or married or confess or attend mass or any number of other services of the Catholic church without paying.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7212

The Sheriff wrote:

usmarine wrote:

OrangeHound wrote:

Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised.  Last time I checked that cost money.
Not where i'm from, church is free.

Scientology isn't.
"baptism" and "marriage" are different than mass.  Where I come from, unless you are a MEMBER, you have to pay.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7208|Argentina

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:

This post by sarge cements his disillusioned perception of the United States. You can shut the fuck up now. Thank you . Have a good day.
It is Serge you dumb, and this was an ironic thread in retaliation to Lowing's thread about Eurabia.  I know the US enough anyway.  You can kiss my ass.  Have a nice day.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7208|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

Point is, he is saying it is not a religion because it is a business, and because it is full of celebs.  Yet I show you the Catholic church has WAY more money and WAY more celebs then scientology, but it is somehow invalidated.  I don't get it.  I think they are nutjobs, but I think the same about every religion.  Some just take it further than others.

So, since we can see the Catholic church is a bigger fraud than scientology, why does nobody bash the catholic church?
I can't believe you don't get the difference.  Scientology followers are all nutjobs and while you are right that the Vatican is a real business, most Christians are peaceful people who aren't making a business out of Christianity.  That's the difference.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7095
except, the people that make a business out of christianity influence the majority of those that do not.  is it really that difficult to comprehend?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6856|North Carolina
Personally, I think we should end the tax exemption status of ALL religions.  Just because you're worshipping somewhere doesn't mean I should have to give you a tax credit for it.  You should have to pay your way just like everyone else.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7208|Argentina

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

except, the people that make a business out of christianity influence the majority of those that do not.  is it really that difficult to comprehend?
That's supposing that the said majority of Christians are dumb.
Marinejuana
local
+415|7036|Seattle
ur missing the point of the scientology issue if u think they are taking over the govt or something. they are just a problem because they exploit the fuck out of people. they dont have significant political power. ...even if they are a rather large, wealthy organization.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7208|Argentina

Marinejuana wrote:

ur missing the point of the scientology issue if u think they are taking over the govt or something. they are just a problem because they exploit the fuck out of people. they dont have significant political power. ...even if they are a rather large, wealthy organization.
I know, I'm just trying to show that this is as ridiculous as the Eurabia thread.  Scientology has no power in the US government.  Islam has no power in Europe.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6856|North Carolina

sergeriver wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

except, the people that make a business out of christianity influence the majority of those that do not.  is it really that difficult to comprehend?
That's supposing that the said majority of Christians are dumb.
The majority of just about any group is dumb.  You can't really change that.

The way I see it...  the stupid deserve to be exploited.  Someone will eventually exploit them one way or another anyway.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7208|Argentina

Turquoise wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

except, the people that make a business out of christianity influence the majority of those that do not.  is it really that difficult to comprehend?
That's supposing that the said majority of Christians are dumb.
The majority of just about any group is dumb.  You can't really change that.

The way I see it...  the stupid deserve to be exploited.  Someone will eventually exploit them one way or another anyway.
I'd like to think otherwise but mankind has proved me wrong.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7212

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Point is, he is saying it is not a religion because it is a business, and because it is full of celebs.  Yet I show you the Catholic church has WAY more money and WAY more celebs then scientology, but it is somehow invalidated.  I don't get it.  I think they are nutjobs, but I think the same about every religion.  Some just take it further than others.

So, since we can see the Catholic church is a bigger fraud than scientology, why does nobody bash the catholic church?
I can't believe you don't get the difference.  Scientology followers are all nutjobs and while you are right that the Vatican is a real business, most Christians are peaceful people who aren't making a business out of Christianity.  That's the difference.
No I think you are missing the point.

You guys jump on people for bashing a religion, yet bash a religion.  Oh but it is ok because you do not think it is a religion.  Interesting to say the least.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7032|SE London

usmarine wrote:

The Sheriff wrote:

usmarine wrote:

In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised.  Last time I checked that cost money.
Not where i'm from, church is free.

Scientology isn't.
"baptism" and "marriage" are different than mass.  Where I come from, unless you are a MEMBER, you have to pay.
Not where I'm from you don't.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2008-02-16 18:00:11)

sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7208|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Point is, he is saying it is not a religion because it is a business, and because it is full of celebs.  Yet I show you the Catholic church has WAY more money and WAY more celebs then scientology, but it is somehow invalidated.  I don't get it.  I think they are nutjobs, but I think the same about every religion.  Some just take it further than others.

So, since we can see the Catholic church is a bigger fraud than scientology, why does nobody bash the catholic church?
I can't believe you don't get the difference.  Scientology followers are all nutjobs and while you are right that the Vatican is a real business, most Christians are peaceful people who aren't making a business out of Christianity.  That's the difference.
No I think you are missing the point.

You guys jump on people for bashing a religion, yet bash a religion.  Oh but it is ok because you do not think it is a religion.  Interesting to say the least.
You guys = ?

You are constantly bashing Islam, an Abrahamic Religion with 1.5 billion followers.  I don't bash Christianity or Judaism, I bash Scientology, which is a ridiculous cult for rich people.  I condemn radical Islam, I respect moderate Muslims.  You don't.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7212

sergeriver wrote:

You guys = ?

You are constantly bashing Islam, an Abrahamic Religion with 1.5 billion followers.  I don't bash Christianity or Judaism, I bash Scientology, which is a ridiculous cult for rich people.  I condemn radical Islam, I respect moderate Muslims.  You don't.
oh so now it comes down to how many followers there are?  or wealth?

get real serge.  If video and the internet and everything else had been around when Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, etc were started, you would be saying the same thing.

And I am sure those religions were started by the poor people.....lulz.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7208|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

You guys = ?

You are constantly bashing Islam, an Abrahamic Religion with 1.5 billion followers.  I don't bash Christianity or Judaism, I bash Scientology, which is a ridiculous cult for rich people.  I condemn radical Islam, I respect moderate Muslims.  You don't.
oh so now it comes down to how many followers there are?  or wealth?

get real serge.  If video and the internet and everything else had been around when Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, etc were started, you would be saying the same thing.

And I am sure those religions were started by the poor people.....lulz.
I'm not asking you to follow a Religion, I don't follow one myself.  I just think you can't generalize about Muslims like you do, and not because they are 1/4 of the World, but because they have a set of beliefs and whether you agree with them or not you must respect them.  You can bash radicals all you want.  You can't bash any Religion just coz you are an atheist.  And what if the three Abrahamic Religions weren't started by poor people.  You can't compare them to Scientology.  Get real yourself.  What set of beliefs does the Scientologists have?  1-Let's say we are a Religion.  2-Let's evade taxes.  3-Let's get richer.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6856|North Carolina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

You guys = ?

You are constantly bashing Islam, an Abrahamic Religion with 1.5 billion followers.  I don't bash Christianity or Judaism, I bash Scientology, which is a ridiculous cult for rich people.  I condemn radical Islam, I respect moderate Muslims.  You don't.
oh so now it comes down to how many followers there are?  or wealth?

get real serge.  If video and the internet and everything else had been around when Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, etc were started, you would be saying the same thing.

And I am sure those religions were started by the poor people.....lulz.
The one thing I can agree with here is...   I think all religion is Santa Claus for adults.

That being said, I also realize most people need it for guidance.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard