310,000,000 > 45K. Celebrities are weird. It's not exactly late breaking news .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Anyone?usmarine wrote:
Funny that the Vatican is one of the largest real estate owners in the world. Not to mention their art collection. But, I guess that is not business, it is what Jesus wanted.sergeriver wrote:
I dunno, maybe a bunch of assholes following a nutjob leader (watch the videos). This can't be considered a Religion, not yet. Maybe all Religions started as a cult. In fact, Scientology is not even a cult, but a business.
The answer is "No." But, in fairness, the Catholic Church was much MUCH worse in the past, and they have really changed quite a bit.usmarine wrote:
Funny that the Vatican is one of the largest real estate owners in the world. Not to mention their art collection. But, I guess that is not business, it is what Jesus wanted.sergeriver wrote:
I dunno, maybe a bunch of assholes following a nutjob leader (watch the videos). This can't be considered a Religion, not yet. Maybe all Religions started as a cult. In fact, Scientology is not even a cult, but a business.
Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-16 10:50:29)
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised. Last time I checked that cost money.OrangeHound wrote:
Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-16 11:24:58)
Not where i'm from, church is free.usmarine wrote:
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised. Last time I checked that cost money.OrangeHound wrote:
Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
No it doesn't ... as I said, there is an expected "honorarium" or an expected donation, but one can be baptized or married or confess or attend mass or any number of other services of the Catholic church without paying.usmarine wrote:
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised. Last time I checked that cost money.OrangeHound wrote:
Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
"baptism" and "marriage" are different than mass. Where I come from, unless you are a MEMBER, you have to pay.The Sheriff wrote:
Not where i'm from, church is free.usmarine wrote:
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised. Last time I checked that cost money.OrangeHound wrote:
Can one fully participate in Scientology without paying?
Scientology isn't.
It is Serge you dumb, and this was an ironic thread in retaliation to Lowing's thread about Eurabia. I know the US enough anyway. You can kiss my ass. Have a nice day.(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:
This post by sarge cements his disillusioned perception of the United States. You can shut the fuck up now. Thank you . Have a good day.
I can't believe you don't get the difference. Scientology followers are all nutjobs and while you are right that the Vatican is a real business, most Christians are peaceful people who aren't making a business out of Christianity. That's the difference.usmarine wrote:
Point is, he is saying it is not a religion because it is a business, and because it is full of celebs. Yet I show you the Catholic church has WAY more money and WAY more celebs then scientology, but it is somehow invalidated. I don't get it. I think they are nutjobs, but I think the same about every religion. Some just take it further than others.
So, since we can see the Catholic church is a bigger fraud than scientology, why does nobody bash the catholic church?
That's supposing that the said majority of Christians are dumb.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
except, the people that make a business out of christianity influence the majority of those that do not. is it really that difficult to comprehend?
I know, I'm just trying to show that this is as ridiculous as the Eurabia thread. Scientology has no power in the US government. Islam has no power in Europe.Marinejuana wrote:
ur missing the point of the scientology issue if u think they are taking over the govt or something. they are just a problem because they exploit the fuck out of people. they dont have significant political power. ...even if they are a rather large, wealthy organization.
The majority of just about any group is dumb. You can't really change that.sergeriver wrote:
That's supposing that the said majority of Christians are dumb.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
except, the people that make a business out of christianity influence the majority of those that do not. is it really that difficult to comprehend?
I'd like to think otherwise but mankind has proved me wrong.Turquoise wrote:
The majority of just about any group is dumb. You can't really change that.sergeriver wrote:
That's supposing that the said majority of Christians are dumb.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
except, the people that make a business out of christianity influence the majority of those that do not. is it really that difficult to comprehend?
The way I see it... the stupid deserve to be exploited. Someone will eventually exploit them one way or another anyway.
No I think you are missing the point.sergeriver wrote:
I can't believe you don't get the difference. Scientology followers are all nutjobs and while you are right that the Vatican is a real business, most Christians are peaceful people who aren't making a business out of Christianity. That's the difference.usmarine wrote:
Point is, he is saying it is not a religion because it is a business, and because it is full of celebs. Yet I show you the Catholic church has WAY more money and WAY more celebs then scientology, but it is somehow invalidated. I don't get it. I think they are nutjobs, but I think the same about every religion. Some just take it further than others.
So, since we can see the Catholic church is a bigger fraud than scientology, why does nobody bash the catholic church?
Not where I'm from you don't.usmarine wrote:
"baptism" and "marriage" are different than mass. Where I come from, unless you are a MEMBER, you have to pay.The Sheriff wrote:
Not where i'm from, church is free.usmarine wrote:
In order to fully participate in the catholic church you need to be baptised. Last time I checked that cost money.
Scientology isn't.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2008-02-16 18:00:11)
You guys = ?usmarine wrote:
No I think you are missing the point.sergeriver wrote:
I can't believe you don't get the difference. Scientology followers are all nutjobs and while you are right that the Vatican is a real business, most Christians are peaceful people who aren't making a business out of Christianity. That's the difference.usmarine wrote:
Point is, he is saying it is not a religion because it is a business, and because it is full of celebs. Yet I show you the Catholic church has WAY more money and WAY more celebs then scientology, but it is somehow invalidated. I don't get it. I think they are nutjobs, but I think the same about every religion. Some just take it further than others.
So, since we can see the Catholic church is a bigger fraud than scientology, why does nobody bash the catholic church?
You guys jump on people for bashing a religion, yet bash a religion. Oh but it is ok because you do not think it is a religion. Interesting to say the least.
oh so now it comes down to how many followers there are? or wealth?sergeriver wrote:
You guys = ?
You are constantly bashing Islam, an Abrahamic Religion with 1.5 billion followers. I don't bash Christianity or Judaism, I bash Scientology, which is a ridiculous cult for rich people. I condemn radical Islam, I respect moderate Muslims. You don't.
I'm not asking you to follow a Religion, I don't follow one myself. I just think you can't generalize about Muslims like you do, and not because they are 1/4 of the World, but because they have a set of beliefs and whether you agree with them or not you must respect them. You can bash radicals all you want. You can't bash any Religion just coz you are an atheist. And what if the three Abrahamic Religions weren't started by poor people. You can't compare them to Scientology. Get real yourself. What set of beliefs does the Scientologists have? 1-Let's say we are a Religion. 2-Let's evade taxes. 3-Let's get richer.usmarine wrote:
oh so now it comes down to how many followers there are? or wealth?sergeriver wrote:
You guys = ?
You are constantly bashing Islam, an Abrahamic Religion with 1.5 billion followers. I don't bash Christianity or Judaism, I bash Scientology, which is a ridiculous cult for rich people. I condemn radical Islam, I respect moderate Muslims. You don't.
get real serge. If video and the internet and everything else had been around when Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, etc were started, you would be saying the same thing.
And I am sure those religions were started by the poor people.....lulz.
The one thing I can agree with here is... I think all religion is Santa Claus for adults.usmarine wrote:
oh so now it comes down to how many followers there are? or wealth?sergeriver wrote:
You guys = ?
You are constantly bashing Islam, an Abrahamic Religion with 1.5 billion followers. I don't bash Christianity or Judaism, I bash Scientology, which is a ridiculous cult for rich people. I condemn radical Islam, I respect moderate Muslims. You don't.
get real serge. If video and the internet and everything else had been around when Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, etc were started, you would be saying the same thing.
And I am sure those religions were started by the poor people.....lulz.