If you start having consensual sex and then She wants stop but you carry on?
Not for me, for my friend...
Not for me, for my friend...
yes.
Wear earphones, problem solved.
See I was thinking that, but would you be given the same sentence as a proper rapist. Like one who goes out just to rape.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
yes.
You rapist!
The Sheriff wrote:
Wear earphones, problem solved.
I would say yes..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
But could you not just say you thought it was role-play or you couldn't hear her?Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
I would say yes..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
if she decides to change her mind after the fact she could call it rapejord wrote:
See I was thinking that, but would you be given the same sentence as a proper rapist. Like one who goes out just to rape.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
yes.
Yeah its possibly called rape in some parts
Humm you could of course, but i dont really think that it would be accepted.jord wrote:
But could you not just say you thought it was role-play or you couldn't hear her?Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
I would say yes..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
punch her in the face
Everyone always says that.jord wrote:
Not for me, for my friend...
So that means technically i raped malbman?
Unless you have certaint proof, I wouldn't count on it..jord wrote:
But could you not just say you thought it was role-play or you couldn't hear her?Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
I would say yes..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
Rape
The second someone says no , u better stop if you dont well you will most likely get charged with rape.....
and then get raped by that rapist your sharing your cell with
poetic justice that is
The second someone says no , u better stop if you dont well you will most likely get charged with rape.....
and then get raped by that rapist your sharing your cell with
poetic justice that is
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
yes.
Oh it's not looking too bright for my friend...
why would you want to stop?
¬_¬
¬_¬
Yes that is rape.
Yes your friend is screwed.
Yes your friend is screwed.
Well bitch should of thought it through before agreeing then, no?SharkyMcshark wrote:
Yes that is rape.
Yes your friend is screwed.
I'm a law undergraduate, so here's your officially-correct answer : P.jord wrote:
If you start having consensual sex and then She wants stop but you carry on?
Not for me, for my friend...
In the UK, sexual intercourse in rape is treated as a 'continuing act', so that there can be liability for what might have appeared to be an omission (legal term for 'failure to act'). As decided by the doctrine of judicial precedence (earlier cases make the law for all later examples), the Privy Council has ruled previously that if a victim consented to penetration, but after penetrated they ceased to give their consent (in other words, the victim wanted to stop), a man would be committing rape if he did not comply and withdraw.
Summary: A definite 'yes', if it can be proven of course!
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
You should have kept that a secret.The Sheriff wrote:
So that means technically i raped malbman?
not if they cant find her...
Wow, there's a law for every situation!Uzique wrote:
I'm a law undergraduate, so here's your officially-correct answer : P.jord wrote:
If you start having consensual sex and then She wants stop but you carry on?
Not for me, for my friend...
In the UK, sexual intercourse in rape is treated as a 'continuing act', so that there can be liability for what might have appeared to be an omission (legal term for 'failure to act'). As decided by the doctrine of judicial precedence (earlier cases make the law for all later examples), the Privy Council has ruled previously that if a victim consented to penetration, but after penetrated they ceased to give their consent (in other words, the victim wanted to stop), a man would be committing rape if he did not comply and withdraw.
Summary: A definite 'yes', if it can be proven of course!
Thank you.