I say let me handle it! Sure i'll leave no survivors and i might mix up the janjaweed with other muslims groups, But hey! Problem Solved! (And I''ll have one hell of a motherfucken time killing people!)
calm down. i was kidding.AAFCptKabbom wrote:
Oh, hell no! you didn't click submit after you thought and typed this...Criminal wrote:
...not my problem
People do need help, no one should have this happening to them, and what comes around goes around - pray your turn is not next!
Yup, +1usmarine2005 wrote:
Those people have no peace because they have no justice. Nobody to stick up for them. The only justice that can solve the situation and get rid of the aggressors is hot lead. So unless you support a multi-national full scale invasion, then you are just pissing in the wind.sergeriver wrote:
I know Africa is fucked, but are you comfortable with those images? I bet you aren't. I'm not either.usmarine2005 wrote:
Why does darfur get all the attention? Having been in that area of the world a few times, this shit is happening all over. Solve darfur and then you will have the next problem to move on to. Once you leave darfur to take care of the next problem, darfur will become a mess again.
I'd prefer that. You just called me a melodramatic hypocrite and I ain't that.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
mad? i didnt call you an asshole.sergeriver wrote:
Melodramatics? Now you are being an asshole, man. I'm very concerned about Darfur, Somalia, Palestine, Haiti, etc, and not because I feel good about myself for saying this. When I criticize Israel it's why don't you talk about Africa. Give me a break.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
save the melodramatics. there is protest everywhere in the world. we've checked that box already. next?
things like "save darfur" bother. Are people so vocal about this issue because they really want it to end, or are they just concerned with how good it feels for themselves to voice their opinion.
reread my post and point out exactly where I called you a hypocrite, please. but yes, you are quite melodramatic.sergeriver wrote:
I'd prefer that. You just called me a melodramatic hypocrite and I ain't that.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
mad? i didnt call you an asshole.sergeriver wrote:
Melodramatics? Now you are being an asshole, man. I'm very concerned about Darfur, Somalia, Palestine, Haiti, etc, and not because I feel good about myself for saying this. When I criticize Israel it's why don't you talk about Africa. Give me a break.
The kids are paying for the corruption and the shennanigans with their lives man.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Adopt a child then. I won't because I don't care. Yeah I said it, at least I'm honest. It bothers me, it saddens me but the corruption and the shennanigans that goes on easily allows me to worry about other things.
This story is becoming too familiar.
Nairobi
Fresh violence in the Sudanese state of West Darfur has restricted humanitarian work around El Geneina, with aid workers describing the region as "a no-go area".
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Split up Sudan. North South. Give them both proper armies let them have a couple of stalemate wars over a couple of decades and eventually they'll get some peace treaty going or create a huge buffer zone or something.
Korea?Mek-Izzle wrote:
Split up Sudan. North South. Give them both proper armies let them have a couple of stalemate wars over a couple of decades and eventually they'll get some peace treaty going or create a huge buffer zone or something.
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: January 9, 2008
KHARTOUM, Sudan (AP) — Sudanese soldiers shot at a convoy of United Nations peacekeepers in Darfur, critically wounding a local driver and destroying a fuel tanker barely a week into the force’s new mission in the region, United Nations officials said Tuesday.
South African peacekeepers protecting the convoy did not return fire, and United Nations troops suffered no casualties, officials said.
The attack was the latest challenge for the United Nations force, which has been heralded by the international community as having the ability to quell the violence in Darfur, though it took the field with only a fraction of the anticipated troops.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/world … sudan.html
Published: January 9, 2008
KHARTOUM, Sudan (AP) — Sudanese soldiers shot at a convoy of United Nations peacekeepers in Darfur, critically wounding a local driver and destroying a fuel tanker barely a week into the force’s new mission in the region, United Nations officials said Tuesday.
South African peacekeepers protecting the convoy did not return fire, and United Nations troops suffered no casualties, officials said.
The attack was the latest challenge for the United Nations force, which has been heralded by the international community as having the ability to quell the violence in Darfur, though it took the field with only a fraction of the anticipated troops.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/world … sudan.html
Xbone Stormsurgezz
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
reread my post and point out exactly where I called you a hypocrite, please. but yes, you are quite melodramatic.sergeriver wrote:
I'd prefer that. You just called me a melodramatic hypocrite and I ain't that.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
mad? i didnt call you an asshole.
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Are people so vocal about this issue because they really want it to end, or are they just concerned with how good it feels for themselves to voice their opinion.
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
People who really are concerned dont let this shit draw out the way it. its week, its a cop out and I doubt most people who say they care actually do.
give it about 6 months before serge starts protesting UN involvement in africa.Kmarion wrote:
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: January 9, 2008
KHARTOUM, Sudan (AP) — Sudanese soldiers shot at a convoy of United Nations peacekeepers in Darfur, critically wounding a local driver and destroying a fuel tanker barely a week into the force’s new mission in the region, United Nations officials said Tuesday.
South African peacekeepers protecting the convoy did not return fire, and United Nations troops suffered no casualties, officials said.
The attack was the latest challenge for the United Nations force, which has been heralded by the international community as having the ability to quell the violence in Darfur, though it took the field with only a fraction of the anticipated troops.
Sudan’s president, Omar Hassan al-Bashir, had opposed any United Nations peacekeeping force in Darfur. Facing international pressure, he agreed in June to allow the joint force, but United Nations officials say his government has thrown up numerous bureaucratic obstacles to its deployment and powers.
It would require an invasion to have an impact... honestly.
It would require an invasion to have an impact... honestly.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Hey buddy, youre the one who associated yourself with the second one, not me.sergeriver wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
reread my post and point out exactly where I called you a hypocrite, please. but yes, you are quite melodramatic.sergeriver wrote:
I'd prefer that. You just called me a melodramatic hypocrite and I ain't that.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Are people so vocal about this issue because they really want it to end, or are they just concerned with how good it feels for themselves to voice their opinion.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
People who really are concerned dont let this shit draw out the way it. its week, its a cop out and I doubt most people who say they care actually do.
now, could you point out where I was addressing YOU as a hypocrite, my version doesnt show that.
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2008-01-16 15:46:10)
u got dat riteSgtSlauther wrote:
Korea?Mek-Izzle wrote:
Split up Sudan. North South. Give them both proper armies let them have a couple of stalemate wars over a couple of decades and eventually they'll get some peace treaty going or create a huge buffer zone or something.
Sort of. The country is Arabs and Africans. Split it up along those lines. It's what's causing the tension anyway, amirite? The predominantly Arab gov and the African ...something.
What's the point of making such a blatant comment when I posted a sincere thread about what I feel about this conflict?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Hey buddy, youre the one who associated yourself with the second one, not me.sergeriver wrote:
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
reread my post and point out exactly where I called you a hypocrite, please. but yes, you are quite melodramatic.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Are people so vocal about this issue because they really want it to end, or are they just concerned with how good it feels for themselves to voice their opinion.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
People who really are concerned dont let this shit draw out the way it. its week, its a cop out and I doubt most people who say they care actually do.
Understood, but those same kids come to a fork in the road where they become the problem or the solution.sergeriver wrote:
The kids are paying for the corruption and the shennanigans with their lives man.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Adopt a child then. I won't because I don't care. Yeah I said it, at least I'm honest. It bothers me, it saddens me but the corruption and the shennanigans that goes on easily allows me to worry about other things.
Malloy must go
There are a few people who have recently made this section extremely unpleasant. I'm not going to warn anymore. They will not continue to ruin it for everyone else.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
11BRAVOusmarine2005 wrote:
lulz..GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
fuck you more.
Are you sure you were never Marine Corps Infantry?
I don't know what the fuck they want from me. I can't post anything without being bashed.Kmarion wrote:
There are a few people who have recently made this section extremely unpleasant. I'm not going to warn anymore. They will not continue to ruin it for everyone else.
I sense ban. d00ds. Calm down.
This thread needs more sgtslauther
This thread needs more sgtslauther
My god, we're back at the point we were when we had the 27-page-long argument about Christianity: no more discussing, just people insulting eachother. Now who's going to be the bigger man here?
-konfusion
-konfusion
But it is his opinion and it is on topic. I would have to agree that alot of us "haves" tend to discuss issues like this to put our own mind at ease. Truth is YOU or I cant do shit. Marine is right, you can't fix it with out force, your right becasue it does suck and someone should do something, and GS is right becuse hes looking at the situation for what it is, out of our reach.
Ok, there's no need to call me a melodramatic for posting this. If he thinks that then he's very shallow.rawls2 wrote:
But it is his opinion and it is on topic. I would have to agree that alot of us "haves" tend to discuss issues like this to put our own mind at ease. Truth is YOU or I cant do shit. Marine is right, you can't fix it with out force, your right becasue it does suck and someone should do something, and GS is right becuse hes looking at the situation for what it is, out of our reach.sergeriver wrote:
I never asked you to agree with me, but saying that most people who voice their concern about this do it because they feel good about themselves and calling me a melodramatic isn't very polite.
meltdown! meltdown! meltdown!
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.