for me: vancouver, bc
or
las vegas, nv
or
las vegas, nv
Last edited by justice (2008-01-01 09:52:25)
Are you mad?suomalainen_äijä wrote:
St.Louis, Missouri
chicago fails miserably. please reconsider.Unzombified_Zombie wrote:
Sandbanks, Poole, Dorset.
If not, I'd settle for Newcastle or Chicago as secondaries.
no, why?usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you mad?suomalainen_äijä wrote:
St.Louis, Missouri
It is commonly referred to as Misery, not Missouri for a reason.suomalainen_äijä wrote:
no, why?usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you mad?suomalainen_äijä wrote:
St.Louis, Missouri
I did say secondary. I like the windy city, but that would only be a last resort (aka, I can't get a good position in the UK, preferably Newcastle).ig wrote:
chicago fails miserably. please reconsider.Unzombified_Zombie wrote:
Sandbanks, Poole, Dorset.
If not, I'd settle for Newcastle or Chicago as secondaries.
atlanta >>>>>>>>>>>> shitcagoUnzombified_Zombie wrote:
I did say secondary. I like the windy city, but that would only be a last resort (aka, I can't get a good position in the UK, preferably Newcastle).ig wrote:
chicago fails miserably. please reconsider.Unzombified_Zombie wrote:
Sandbanks, Poole, Dorset.
If not, I'd settle for Newcastle or Chicago as secondaries.
Anyway, I'd rather live in Chicago than Kansas City, I hated that place when we stopped off.
No infidels allowed.David.P wrote:
Mecca.
jord wrote:
I'd quite like to just live in the country in America in a cabin and just hunt. Be at one with nature and all that.
Part of me thinks I'd miss internet/tv.